Literature DB >> 1671993

Efficacy of eyepad in corneal healing after corneal foreign body removal.

M F Hulbert1.   

Abstract

30 patients with corneal epithelial defect due to removal of corneal foreign bodies were randomly allocated to receive either chloramphenicol with continuous application of an eyepad or chloramphenicol without the eyepad. Almost all corneal defects were healed at 24 h, and all were healed by 48 h, with no statistically significant difference between the two groups. Discomfort at 24 h was greater in the eyepad group than in the control group. An eyepad seems to confer no benefit in healing and is uncomfortable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1671993     DOI: 10.1016/0140-6736(91)92454-a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  4 in total

1.  Is an eye pad needed in cases of corneal abrasion?

Authors:  D L Easty
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-10-23

2.  Non-penetrating corneal foreign body injuries: factors affecting delay in rehabilitation of patients.

Authors:  D G Jayamanne; R W Bell
Journal:  J Accid Emerg Med       Date:  1994-09

Review 3.  Diabetic keratopathy: Insights and challenges.

Authors:  S Priyadarsini; A Whelchel; S Nicholas; R Sharif; K Riaz; D Karamichos
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-02-22       Impact factor: 6.048

4.  Do topical antibiotics help corneal epithelial trauma?

Authors:  J W King; R J Brison
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 3.275

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.