Literature DB >> 7802766

The trouble with ethics committees.

T W Meade.   

Abstract

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Department of Health (Great Britain); National Health Service; Royal College of Physicians of London

Mesh：

Year:  1994        PMID： 7802766      PMCID： PMC5400901     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Coll Physicians Lond        ISSN： 0035-8819


× No keyword cloud information.
  10 in total

1.  Performance of research ethics committees in Spain. A prospective study of 100 applications for clinical trial protocols on medicines.

Authors:  R Dal-Ré; J Espada; R Ortega
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Multicentre research ethics committees: have they helped?

Authors:  I Larcombe; M Mott
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 3.  New governance arrangements for research ethics committees: is facilitating research achieved at the cost of participants' interest.

Authors:  E Cave; S Holm
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  Multicentre trials review process by research ethics committees in Spain: where do they stand before implementing the new European regulation?

Authors:  R Dal-Ré; R Ortega; E Morejón
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  Pharmaceutical trials in general practice: the first 100 protocols. An audit by the clinical research ethics committee of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

Authors:  P Wise; M Drury
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-11-16

6.  Cross district comparison of applications to research ethics committees.

Authors:  P Garfield
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-09-09

7.  Research ethics committee audit: differences between committees.

Authors:  M E Redshaw; A Harris; J D Baum
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 2.903

8.  The annual reports of Local Research Ethics Committees.

Authors:  C G Foster; T Marshall; P Moodie
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 2.903

9.  Ethical approval for research involving geographically dispersed subjects: unsuitability of the UK MREC/LREC system and relevance to uncommon genetic disorders.

Authors:  J C Lewis; S Tomkins; J R Sampson
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.903

10.  Clinical governance and research ethics as barriers to UK low-risk population-based health research?

Authors:  Edwin R van Teijlingen; Flora Douglas; Nicola Torrance
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2008-11-28       Impact factor: 3.295
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.