Literature DB >> 7796795

The Neurotoxicity Scale: the validity of a patient-based scale, assessing neurotoxicity.

A P Aldenkamp1, G Baker, M S Pieters, H C Schoemaker, A F Cohen, S Schwabe.   

Abstract

The validity of a patient-based scale, presumably measuring adverse effects of drugs on cognitive function, was examined in a normal volunteer study. Thirty subjects were randomly assigned to placebo or one of two doses of a benzodiazepine, temazepam (10 mg and 20 mg), in a double-blind placebo-controlled parallel group design. Plasma samples were taken before the scale was completed and up to 8 hours post-dose. After administration of the medication the subjects were asked to maintain their normal daily routine as much as possible (reading, studying, conversations). The inventory was administered twice, at 50 minutes and 2 hours post-dose (peak level). The overall score was different between the three groups, only for the second assessment, 2 h post-dose (ANOVA, P < 0.02). Multiple t-testing between the three groups revealed statistically significant differences between placebo and the 10 mg temazepam group (P = 0.02) and between placebo and the 20 mg temazepam group (P = 0.006). No significant difference was found between the two temazepam groups. Analysis of the separate questions showed least sensitivity for questions related to the domain of 'hyperexcitability' and most sensitivity for 'fatigue' and 'slowing.' The overall score appeared to be sensitive already for the lower toxicity range suggesting an 'all or nothing effect'. The subjective reports, collected by using this scale, may therefore be used for the detection of gross overall changes in cognitive functioning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7796795     DOI: 10.1016/0920-1211(94)00082-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epilepsy Res        ISSN: 0920-1211            Impact factor:   3.045


  7 in total

1.  Patient-Reported Adverse Effects Associated with Combination Antiretroviral Therapy and Coadministered Enzyme-Inducing Antiepileptic Drugs.

Authors:  Melissa A Elafros; Gretchen L Birbeck; Joseph C Gardiner; Omar K Siddiqi; Izukanji Sikazwe; Nigel Paneth; Christopher M Bositis; Jason F Okulicz
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.345

2.  Migraine comorbidity and cognitive performance in patients with focal epilepsy.

Authors:  Olivia A J Begasse de Dhaem; Jacqueline French; Chris Morrison; Kimford J Meador; Dale C Hesdorffer; Sabrina Cristofaro; Mia T Minen
Journal:  Epilepsy Behav       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 2.937

Review 3.  Quality of life as an outcome measure for epilepsy clinical trials.

Authors:  J A Cramer
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  1997-10

Review 4.  Evaluation of drug treatment outcome in epilepsy: a clinical perspective.

Authors:  E Perucca
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  1997-10

Review 5.  Antiepileptic drug-induced cognitive adverse effects: potential mechanisms and contributing factors.

Authors:  Marco Mula; Michael R Trimble
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.749

6.  Zonisamide, topiramate, and levetiracetam: efficacy and neuropsychological effects in alcohol use disorders.

Authors:  Clifford M Knapp; Domenic A Ciraulo; Ofra Sarid-Segal; Mark A Richardson; Eric Devine; Chris C Streeter; Marlene Oscar-Berman; Caitlin Surprise; Laurie Colaneri; Meghan Putnam; Megan Waters; Courtney Richambault
Journal:  J Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.153

Review 7.  Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) assessment in epilepsy: a review of epilepsy-specific PROs according to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulatory requirements.

Authors:  Annabel Nixon; Cicely Kerr; Katie Breheny; Diane Wild
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 3.186

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.