Literature DB >> 7791231

Lung cancer in radon-exposed miners and estimation of risk from indoor exposure.

J H Lubin1, J D Boice, C Edling, R W Hornung, G R Howe, E Kunz, R A Kusiak, H I Morrison, E P Radford, J M Samet.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Radioactive radon is an inert gas that can migrate from soils and rocks and accumulate in enclosed areas, such as homes and underground mines. Studies of miners show that exposure to radon decay products causes lung cancer. Consequently, it is of public health interest to estimate accurately the consequences of daily, low-level exposure in homes to this known carcinogen. Epidemiologic studies of residential radon exposure are burdened by an inability to estimate exposure accurately, low total exposure, and subsequent small excess risks. As a result, the studies have been inconclusive to date. Estimates of the hazard posed by residential radon have been based on analyses of data on miners, with recent estimates based on a pooling of four occupational cohort studies of miners, including 360 lung cancer deaths.
PURPOSE: To more fully describe the lung cancer risk in radon-exposed miners, we pooled original data from 11 studies of radon-exposed underground miners, conducted a comprehensive analysis, and developed models for estimating radon-associated lung cancer risk.
METHODS: We pooled original data from 11 cohort studies of radon-exposed underground miners, including 65,000 men and more than 2700 lung cancer deaths, and fit various relative risk (RR) regression models.
RESULTS: The RR relationship for cumulative radon progeny exposure was consistently linear in the range of miner exposures, suggesting that exposures at lower levels, such as in homes, would carry some risk. The exposure-response trend for never-smokers was threefold the trend for smokers, indicating a greater RR for exposure in never-smokers. The RR from exposure diminished with time since the exposure occurred. For equal total exposure, exposures of long duration (and low rate) were more harmful than exposures of short duration (and high rate).
CONCLUSIONS: In the miners, about 40% of all lung cancer deaths may be due to radon progeny exposure, 70% of lung cancer deaths in never-smokers, and 39% of lung cancer deaths in smokers. In the United States, 10% of all lung cancer deaths might be due to indoor radon exposure, 11% of lung cancer deaths in smokers, and 30% of lung cancer deaths in never-smokers. This risk model estimates that reducing radon in all homes exceeding the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency's recommended action level may reduce lung cancer deaths about 2%-4%. These estimates should be interpreted with caution, because concomitant exposures of miners to agents such as arsenic or diesel exhaust may modify the radon effect and, when considered together with other differences between homes and mines, might reduce the generalizability of findings in miners.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7791231     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/87.11.817

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  62 in total

Review 1.  Hormesis, an update of the present position.

Authors:  Lennart Johansson
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-04-26       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  Gallbladder cancer.

Authors:  Mislav Rakić; Leonardo Patrlj; Mario Kopljar; Robert Kliček; Marijan Kolovrat; Bozo Loncar; Zeljko Busic
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 7.293

3.  Mitochondrial alteration in malignantly transformed human small airway epithelial cells induced by α-particles.

Authors:  Suping Zhang; Gengyun Wen; Sarah X L Huang; Jianrong Wang; Jian Tong; Tom K Hei
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 7.396

4.  Radiation-induced mutations in unirradiated DNA.

Authors:  A J Grosovsky
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-05-11       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Smoking and hormesis as confounding factors in radiation pulmonary carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Charles L Sanders; Bobby R Scott
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 2.658

6.  Invited commentary: is it time to retire the "pack-years" variable? Maybe not!

Authors:  Duncan C Thomas
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Absorbed doses of lungs from radon retained in airway lumens of mice and rats.

Authors:  Akihiro Sakoda; Yuu Ishimori; Kiyonori Yamaoka; Takahiro Kataoka; Fumihiro Mitsunobu
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2013-06-15       Impact factor: 1.925

8.  Measurement of indoor radon concentration and assessment of doses in different districts of Alexandria city, Egypt.

Authors:  Mohamed Abd-Elzaher
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 4.609

Review 9.  Lung cancer in never smokers: clinical epidemiology and environmental risk factors.

Authors:  Jonathan M Samet; Erika Avila-Tang; Paolo Boffetta; Lindsay M Hannan; Susan Olivo-Marston; Michael J Thun; Charles M Rudin
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  Radon, smoking, and lung cancer: the need to refocus radon control policy.

Authors:  Paula M Lantz; David Mendez; Martin A Philbert
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.