Literature DB >> 7790795

The audible release associated with joint manipulation.

R Brodeur1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this paper is to review the literature on the audible release associated with manipulation. DATA SOURCES: Bibliographic information in pertinent articles and papers located in the MEDLINE database containing the keywords joint, joints, cartilage, crack, cracking, cavitation, crepitus and noise. STUDY SELECTION: All articles relevant to the objectives were selected. DATA EXTRACTION: All available data was used. DATA SYNTHESIS: The audible release is caused by a cavitation process whereby a sudden decrease in intracapsular pressure causes dissolved gasses in the synovial fluid to be released into the joint cavity. Once a joint undergoes cavitation, the force-displacement curve changes and the range of motion of the joint increases. The gasses released from the synovial fluid make up about 15% of the joint volume and consist of approximately 80% carbon dioxide. Habitual joint cracking does not correlate with arthritic changes, but does correlate with loss of grip strength and soft-tissue swelling. During the "crack" associated with a joint manipulation, there is a sudden joint distraction that occurs in less time than that required to complete the stretch reflexes of periarticular muscles. Theories on the cavitation mechanism were reviewed and new information on the cavitation process is introduced. In this paper, it is proposed that the cavitation process is generated by an elastic recoil of the synovial capsule as it "snaps back" from the capsule/synovial fluid interface.
CONCLUSIONS: Because the sudden joint distraction during a manipulation occurs in a shorter time period than that required to complete the stretch reflexes of the periarticular muscles, there is likely to be a high impulse acting on the ligaments and muscles associated with the joint. This is an important conclusion, because others have proposed that reflex actions from high threshold periarticular receptors are associated with the many beneficial results of manipulation. This suggests that the cavitation process provides a simple means for initiating the reflex actions and that without the cavitation process, it would be difficult to generate the forces in the appropriate tissue without causing muscular damage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7790795

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther        ISSN: 0161-4754            Impact factor:   1.437


  19 in total

1.  A Feasibility Study to Assess Vibration and Sound From Zygapophyseal Joints During Motion Before and After Spinal Manipulation.

Authors:  Gregory D Cramer; Matthew Budavich; Preetam Bora; Kim Ross
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 1.437

2.  Does an audible release improve the outcome of a chiropractic adjustment?

Authors:  Mischa Bakker; Joyce Miller
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2004-09

3.  Distribution of cavitations as identified with accelerometry during lumbar spinal manipulation.

Authors:  Gregory D Cramer; J Kim Ross; P K Raju; Jerrilyn A Cambron; Jennifer M Dexheimer; Preetam Bora; Ray McKinnis; Scott Selby; Adam R Habeck
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 1.437

4.  CAVITATION SOUNDS DURING CERVICOTHORACIC SPINAL MANIPULATION.

Authors:  James Dunning; Firas Mourad; Andrea Zingoni; Raffaele Iorio; Thomas Perreault; Noah Zacharko; César Fernández de Las Peñas; Raymond Butts; Joshua A Cleland
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2017-08

5.  Evaluating the relationship among cavitation, zygapophyseal joint gapping, and spinal manipulation: an exploratory case series.

Authors:  Gregory D Cramer; Kim Ross; Judith Pocius; Joe A Cantu; Evelyn Laptook; Michael Fergus; Doug Gregerson; Scott Selby; P K Raju
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.437

6.  Comparison of human lumbar facet joint capsule strains during simulated high-velocity, low-amplitude spinal manipulation versus physiological motions.

Authors:  Allyson Ianuzzi; Partap S Khalsa
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.166

7.  Manipulation under anesthesia for lumbopelvic pain: a retrospective review of 18 cases.

Authors:  Douglas J Taber; Gary D James; Alain Jacon
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2014-03

8.  "Knuckle Cracking": Can Blinded Observers Detect Changes with Physical Examination and Sonography?

Authors:  Robert D Boutin; Anuj P Netto; David Nakamura; Cyrus Bateni; Robert M Szabo; Michael Cronan; Brent Foster; William R Barfield; J Anthony Seibert; Abhijit J Chaudhari
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Quantification of cavitation and gapping of lumbar zygapophyseal joints during spinal manipulative therapy.

Authors:  Gregory D Cramer; Kim Ross; P K Raju; Jerrilyn Cambron; Joe A Cantu; Preetam Bora; Jennifer M Dexheimer; Ray McKinnis; Adam R Habeck; Scott Selby; Judith D Pocius; Douglas Gregerson
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 1.437

10.  Validation of a novel sham cervical manipulation procedure.

Authors:  Howard T Vernon; John J Triano; James K Ross; Steven K Tran; David M Soave; Maricelle D Dinulos
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 4.166

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.