Literature DB >> 21237402

Evaluating the relationship among cavitation, zygapophyseal joint gapping, and spinal manipulation: an exploratory case series.

Gregory D Cramer1, Kim Ross, Judith Pocius, Joe A Cantu, Evelyn Laptook, Michael Fergus, Doug Gregerson, Scott Selby, P K Raju.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This project determined the feasibility of conducting larger studies assessing the relationship between cavitation and zygapophyseal (Z) joint gapping following spinal manipulative therapy (SMT).
METHODS: Five healthy volunteers (average age, 25.4 years) were screened and examined against inclusion and exclusion criteria. High-signal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) markers were fixed to T12, L3, and S1 spinous processes. Scout images were taken to verify the location of the markers. Axial images of the L4/L5 and L5/S1 levels were obtained in the neutral supine position. Following the first MRI, accelerometers were placed over the same spinous processes; and recordings were made from them during side-posture positioning and SMT. The accelerometers were removed, and each subject was scanned in side-posture. The greatest central anterior to posterior Z joint spaces (gap) were measured from the first and second MRI scans. Values obtained from the first scan were subtracted from those of the second, with a positive result indicating an increase in gapping following SMT (positive gapping difference). Gapping difference was compared between the up-side (SMT) joints vs the down-side (non-SMT) joints and between up-side cavitation vs up-side noncavitation joints.
RESULTS: Greater gapping was found in Z joints that received SMT (0.5 ± 0.6 mm) vs non-SMT joints (-0.2 ± 0.6 mm), and vertebral segments that cavitated gapped more than those that did not cavitate (0.8 ± 0.7 vs 0.4 ± 0.5 mm).
CONCLUSIONS: A future clinical study is quite feasible. Forty subjects (30 in an SMT group and 10 in a control group) would be needed for appropriate power (0.90). Copyright Â
© 2011 National University of Health Sciences. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21237402      PMCID: PMC3582390          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2010.11.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther        ISSN: 0161-4754            Impact factor:   1.437


  30 in total

1.  An in vivo preparation for investigating neural responses to controlled loading of a lumbar vertebra in the anesthetized cat.

Authors:  J G Pickar
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  1999-07-15       Impact factor: 2.390

2.  Cervical mobilisation: concurrent effects on pain, sympathetic nervous system activity and motor activity.

Authors:  M Sterling; G Jull; A Wright
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2001-05

3.  Spinal manipulative therapy reduces inflammatory cytokines but not substance P production in normal subjects.

Authors:  Julita A Teodorczyk-Injeyan; H Stephen Injeyan; Richard Ruegg
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.437

Review 4.  The audible release associated with joint manipulation.

Authors:  R Brodeur
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  1995 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.437

5.  Comparison of human lumbar facet joint capsule strains during simulated high-velocity, low-amplitude spinal manipulation versus physiological motions.

Authors:  Allyson Ianuzzi; Partap S Khalsa
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.166

6.  Do cerebral potentials to magnetic stimulation of paraspinal muscles reflect changes in palpable muscle spasm, low back pain, and activity scores?

Authors:  Y Zhu; S Haldeman; C Y Hsieh; P Wu; A Starr
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.437

7.  Onset and recovery of hyperalgesia and hyperexcitability of sensory neurons following intervertebral foramen volume reduction and restoration.

Authors:  Xue-Jun Song; Dong-Sheng Xu; Carlos Vizcarra; Ronald L Rupert
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.437

8.  Paraspinal muscle evoked cerebral potentials in patients with unilateral low back pain.

Authors:  Y Zhu; S Haldeman; A Starr; M A Seffinger; S H Su
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Determining cavitation location during lumbar and thoracic spinal manipulation: is spinal manipulation accurate and specific?

Authors:  J Kim Ross; David E Bereznick; Stuart M McGill
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Human lumbar facet joint capsule strains: I. During physiological motions.

Authors:  Allyson Ianuzzi; Jesse S Little; Jonathan B Chiu; Avi Baitner; Greg Kawchuk; Partap S Khalsa
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.166

View more
  10 in total

1.  Effect of spinal manipulative therapy on mechanical pain sensitivity in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain: a pilot randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Bryan M Bond; Chris D Kinslow; Adam W Yoder; Wen Liu
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2019-03-05

2.  A Feasibility Study to Assess Vibration and Sound From Zygapophyseal Joints During Motion Before and After Spinal Manipulation.

Authors:  Gregory D Cramer; Matthew Budavich; Preetam Bora; Kim Ross
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 1.437

3.  Distribution of cavitations as identified with accelerometry during lumbar spinal manipulation.

Authors:  Gregory D Cramer; J Kim Ross; P K Raju; Jerrilyn A Cambron; Jennifer M Dexheimer; Preetam Bora; Ray McKinnis; Scott Selby; Adam R Habeck
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 1.437

4.  Essential literature for the chiropractic profession: Results and implementation challenges from a survey of international chiropractic faculty.

Authors:  Barbara A Mansholt; Stacie A Salsbury; Lance G Corber; John S Stites
Journal:  J Chiropr Educ       Date:  2017-08-02

5.  Manipulation under anesthesia for lumbopelvic pain: a retrospective review of 18 cases.

Authors:  Douglas J Taber; Gary D James; Alain Jacon
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2014-03

6.  Quantification of cavitation and gapping of lumbar zygapophyseal joints during spinal manipulative therapy.

Authors:  Gregory D Cramer; Kim Ross; P K Raju; Jerrilyn Cambron; Joe A Cantu; Preetam Bora; Jennifer M Dexheimer; Ray McKinnis; Adam R Habeck; Scott Selby; Judith D Pocius; Douglas Gregerson
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 1.437

7.  Magnetic resonance imaging zygapophyseal joint space changes (gapping) in low back pain patients following spinal manipulation and side-posture positioning: a randomized controlled mechanisms trial with blinding.

Authors:  Gregory D Cramer; Jerrilyn Cambron; Joe A Cantu; Jennifer M Dexheimer; Judith D Pocius; Douglas Gregerson; Michael Fergus; Ray McKinnis; Thomas J Grieve
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 1.437

8.  Neurophysiologic effects of spinal manipulation in patients with chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Brian C Clark; David A Goss; Stevan Walkowski; Richard L Hoffman; Andrew Ross; James S Thomas
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  The effect of spinal manipulative therapy on experimentally induced pain: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Mario Millan; Charlotte Leboeuf-Yde; Brian Budgell; Michel-Ange Amorim
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2012-08-10

10.  Spinal manipulation and therapeutic exercises in treating post-surgical resurgent lumbar radiculopathy.

Authors:  Vinicius Tieppo Francio; Chris Towery; Saeid Davani; Tony Brown
Journal:  Oxf Med Case Reports       Date:  2017-10-13
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.