Literature DB >> 778869

Spatial patterning of response to odors in the peripheral olfactory system.

D G Moulton.   

Abstract

The low odor specificities of the olfactory receptors suggest that odor recognition depends on the simultaneous activity in an ensemble of receptor neurons. This ensemble could conceivably code quality without reference to the point of origin of each input on the receptor sheet. However, the nose-to-bulb projection appears sufficiently precise to provide the bulb with a topographical map of the receptor sheet although it is poorly delineated in the anteroposterior plane. (It is also known that the morphological changes that follow prolonged exposure to odors are more differentiated in the coronal than in the anteroposterior plane.) Furthermore, it is clear from work at both epithelial and bulbar levels that a spatiotemporal pattern of excitation is generated by odor stimulation of the receptor sheet and that this pattern differs for different odors. This evidence, then, supports the view that there is a spatial component to odor quality coding. This spatial pattern has two elements. One is imposed and depends (at least in part) on differences in the retentivity of different odorants by the mucous sheet, which has powerful sorptive properties. It effectiveness seems particularly weak for odorants with relatively long retention times. The second component is inherent and depends on the tendency of receptors with similar peak odor specificities to aggregate in the same region (or regions) of the epithelium. Different odors or groups of odors maximally excite different regions, which may overlap. The imposed component could not, in itself, provide an adequate mechanism for odor recognition, partly because many compounds have comparable or even identical mean retention times (e.g., enantiomeric isomers). The inherent component, on the other hand, possesses this potential. However, either or both forms of patterning may cooperate with a third nonspatial mechanism (based on differential responsiveness of receptors to different odors) in coding odor quality.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1976        PMID: 778869     DOI: 10.1152/physrev.1976.56.3.578

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Rev        ISSN: 0031-9333            Impact factor:   37.312


  23 in total

Review 1.  Sniffing and spatiotemporal coding in olfaction.

Authors:  John W Scott
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2005-12-14       Impact factor: 3.160

2.  Predicting odorant quality perceptions from multidimensional scaling of olfactory bulb glomerular activity patterns.

Authors:  Steven L Youngentob; Brett A Johnson; Michael Leon; Paul R Sheehe; Paul F Kent
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.912

Review 3.  The olfactory bulb and central pathways.

Authors:  J W Scott
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1986-03-15

4.  How much does nasal cavity morphology matter? Patterns and rates of olfactory airflow in phyllostomid bats.

Authors:  Thomas P Eiting; J Blair Perot; Elizabeth R Dumont
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Tuning to odor solubility and sorption pattern in olfactory epithelial responses.

Authors:  John W Scott; Lisa Sherrill; Jianbo Jiang; Kai Zhao
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Tests of the sorption and olfactory "fovea" hypotheses in the mouse.

Authors:  David M Coppola; Brittaney E Ritchie; Brent A Craven
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Rostro-caudal patterning of receptor-expressing olfactory neurones in the rat nasal cavity.

Authors:  J Strotmann; I Wanner; T Helfrich; A Beck; H Breer
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 5.249

8.  Mapping of odor-related neuronal activity in the olfactory bulb by high-resolution 2-deoxyglucose autoradiography.

Authors:  D Lancet; C A Greer; J S Kauer; G M Shepherd
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Spatial pattern of sensory cell terminals in the olfactory sac of the tiger salamander. I. A scanning electron microscope study.

Authors:  W Breipohl; D Moulton; M Ummels; D H Matulionis
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 2.610

10.  The vomeronasal epithelia of NMRI mouse. A scanning electron-microscopic study.

Authors:  T Naguro; W Breipohl
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 5.249

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.