Literature DB >> 7786998

A note on the bias of estimators with missing data.

A Rotnitzky1, D Wypij.   

Abstract

It is well known that many standard analyses, including maximum likelihood estimation and the generalized estimating equation approach (Liang and Zeger, 1986, Biometrika 73, 13-22) can result in biased estimation when there are missing observations. In such cases it is of interest to calculate the magnitude of the bias incurred under specific assumptions about the process generating the full data and the nonresponse mechanism. In this paper we give a condition that identifies the limit in probability of estimators that are solutions of estimating equations computed from the incomplete data. With discrete data, this condition suggests a simple algorithm to compute the asymptotic bias of these estimators that can be easily implemented with existing statistical software. We illustrate our approach with asthma prevalence data in children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7786998

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  12 in total

1.  Consistency of Normal Distribution Based Pseudo Maximum Likelihood Estimates When Data Are Missing at Random.

Authors:  Ke-Hai Yuan; Peter M Bentler
Journal:  Am Stat       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 8.710

2.  An autoregressive growth model for longitudinal item analysis.

Authors:  Minjeong Jeon; Sophia Rabe-Hesketh
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 2.500

3.  Using multiple imputation to address the inconsistent distribution of a controlling variable when modeling an infrequent outcome.

Authors:  Yujia Zhang; Sara Crawford; Sheree L Boulet; Michael Monsour; Bruce Cohen; Patricia McKane; Karen Freeman
Journal:  J Mod Appl Stat Methods       Date:  2017

4.  Doubly robust estimates for binary longitudinal data analysis with missing response and missing covariates.

Authors:  Baojiang Chen; Xiao-Hua Zhou
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2011-01-31       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Marginal methods for clustered longitudinal binary data with incomplete covariates.

Authors:  Baojiang Chen; Grace Y Yi; Richard J Cook; Xiao-Hua Zhou
Journal:  J Stat Plan Inference       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.111

6.  Bayesian Sensitivity Analysis of a Nonlinear Dynamic Factor Analysis Model with Nonparametric Prior and Possible Nonignorable Missingness.

Authors:  Niansheng Tang; Sy-Miin Chow; Joseph G Ibrahim; Hongtu Zhu
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 2.500

7.  Joint generalized estimating equations for multivariate longitudinal binary outcomes with missing data: An application to AIDS data.

Authors:  Stuart R Lipsitz; Garrett M Fitzmaurice; Joseph G Ibrahim; Debajyoti Sinha; Michael Parzen; Steven Lipshultz
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.483

Review 8.  Needs assessment instruments for family caregivers of cancer patients receiving palliative care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Qinqin Cheng; Binbin Xu; Marques S N Ng; Hongling Zheng; Winnie K W So
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2022-05-28       Impact factor: 3.359

9.  Almost efficient estimation of relative risk regression.

Authors:  Garrett M Fitzmaurice; Stuart R Lipsitz; Alex Arriaga; Debajyoti Sinha; Caprice Greenberg; Atul A Gawande
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 5.899

10.  Are spatial models advantageous for predicting county-level HIV epidemiology across the United States?

Authors:  Danielle Sass; Bita Fayaz Farkhad; Bo Li; Man-Pui Sally Chan; Dolores Albarracín
Journal:  Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol       Date:  2021-06-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.