Literature DB >> 24705141

Almost efficient estimation of relative risk regression.

Garrett M Fitzmaurice1, Stuart R Lipsitz2, Alex Arriaga2, Debajyoti Sinha3, Caprice Greenberg4, Atul A Gawande5.   

Abstract

Relative risks (RRs) are often considered the preferred measures of association in prospective studies, especially when the binary outcome of interest is common. In particular, many researchers regard RRs to be more intuitively interpretable than odds ratios. Although RR regression is a special case of generalized linear models, specifically with a log link function for the binomial (or Bernoulli) outcome, the resulting log-binomial regression does not respect the natural parameter constraints. Because log-binomial regression does not ensure that predicted probabilities are mapped to the [0,1] range, maximum likelihood (ML) estimation is often subject to numerical instability that leads to convergence problems. To circumvent these problems, a number of alternative approaches for estimating RR regression parameters have been proposed. One approach that has been widely studied is the use of Poisson regression estimating equations. The estimating equations for Poisson regression yield consistent, albeit inefficient, estimators of the RR regression parameters. We consider the relative efficiency of the Poisson regression estimator and develop an alternative, almost efficient estimator for the RR regression parameters. The proposed method uses near-optimal weights based on a Maclaurin series (Taylor series expanded around zero) approximation to the true Bernoulli or binomial weight function. This yields an almost efficient estimator while avoiding convergence problems. We examine the asymptotic relative efficiency of the proposed estimator for an increase in the number of terms in the series. Using simulations, we demonstrate the potential for convergence problems with standard ML estimation of the log-binomial regression model and illustrate how this is overcome using the proposed estimator. We apply the proposed estimator to a study of predictors of pre-operative use of beta blockers among patients undergoing colorectal surgery after diagnosis of colon cancer.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bernoulli likelihood; Convergence problems; Maclaurin series; Poisson regression; Quasi-likelihood

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24705141      PMCID: PMC4168315          DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxu012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biostatistics        ISSN: 1465-4644            Impact factor:   5.899


  13 in total

1.  [Logistic regression vs other generalized linear models to estimate prevalence rate ratios].

Authors:  P Traissac; Y Martin-Prével; F Delpeuch; B Maire
Journal:  Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.019

2.  Estimating the relative risk in cohort studies and clinical trials of common outcomes.

Authors:  Louise-Anne McNutt; Chuntao Wu; Xiaonan Xue; Jean Paul Hafner
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  A modified poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data.

Authors:  Guangyong Zou
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Binomial regression in GLIM: estimating risk ratios and risk differences.

Authors:  S Wacholder
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Warning regarding the use of GLIM macros for the estimation of risk ratios.

Authors:  M Baumgarten; P Seliske; M S Goldberg
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  The effect of bisoprolol on perioperative mortality and myocardial infarction in high-risk patients undergoing vascular surgery. Dutch Echocardiographic Cardiac Risk Evaluation Applying Stress Echocardiography Study Group.

Authors:  D Poldermans; E Boersma; J J Bax; I R Thomson; L L van de Ven; J D Blankensteijn; H F Baars; T I Yo; G Trocino; C Vigna; J R Roelandt; H van Urk
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-12-09       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  A note on the bias of estimators with missing data.

Authors:  A Rotnitzky; D Wypij
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  ASA physical status classifications: a study of consistency of ratings.

Authors:  W D Owens; J A Felts; E L Spitznagel
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 7.892

9.  Use of odds ratio or relative risk to measure a treatment effect in clinical trials with multiple correlated binary outcomes: data from the NINDS t-PA stroke trial.

Authors:  M Lu; B C Tilley
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2001-07-15       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  A general binomial regression model to estimate standardized risk differences from binary response data.

Authors:  Stephanie A Kovalchik; Ravi Varadhan; Barbara Fetterman; Nancy E Poitras; Sholom Wacholder; Hormuzd A Katki
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 2.373

View more
  3 in total

1.  Estimating the Relative Excess Risk Due to Interaction in Clustered-Data Settings.

Authors:  Katharine Correia; Paige L Williams
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Implementation and results of an integrated data quality assurance protocol in a randomized controlled trial in Uttar Pradesh, India.

Authors:  Jonathon D Gass; Anamika Misra; Mahendra Nath Singh Yadav; Fatima Sana; Chetna Singh; Anup Mankar; Brandon J Neal; Jennifer Fisher-Bowman; Jenny Maisonneuve; Megan Marx Delaney; Krishan Kumar; Vinay Pratap Singh; Narender Sharma; Atul Gawande; Katherine Semrau; Lisa R Hirschhorn
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 2.279

3.  Evaluation of a call center to assess post-discharge maternal and early neonatal outcomes of facility-based childbirth in Uttar Pradesh, India.

Authors:  Jonathon D Gass; Katherine Semrau; Fatima Sana; Anup Mankar; Vinay Pratap Singh; Jennifer Fisher-Bowman; Brandon J Neal; Danielle E Tuller; Bharath Kumar; Stuart Lipsitz; Narender Sharma; Bhala Kodkany; Vishwajeet Kumar; Atul Gawande; Lisa R Hirschhorn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.