Literature DB >> 7784572

Evaluation of a non-breath-hold MR cholangiography technique.

S E Macaulay1, S J Schulte, J H Sekijima, R G Obregon, H E Simon, C A Rohrmann, P C Freeny, U P Schmiedl.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate prospectively a non-breath-hold magnetic resonance (MR) cholangiographic technique.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine non-breath-hold, heavily T2-weighted, turbo spin-echo MR cholangiograms were obtained in 28 patients and compared with 28 direct cholangiographic studies in 24 patients.
RESULTS: MR cholangiography showed the intrahepatic ducts (IHDs) within the peripheral third of the liver and within the four hepatic segments in 100% of cases with dilated ducts. IHDs were seen in the peripheral third in 82% of cases with nondilated ducts and within the four hepatic segments in 91%. The extrahepatic duct (EHD), dilated and nondilated, was visualized in 90% of cases. Filling defects were identified in the EHD in 71% of cases and in the gallbladder in 100%. All obstructions were identified and their site and character accurately shown in most cases. The presence of IHD dilatation was accurately shown, and estimates of EHD and main pancreatic duct caliber correlated closely with those of direct cholangiography.
CONCLUSION: Non-breath-hold MR cholangiography is a reliable method for depiction of the biliary system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7784572     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.196.1.7784572

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  10 in total

Review 1.  Biliary tract imaging.

Authors:  E Corazziari
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  1999-04

2.  Imaging diagnosis of pancreato-biliary diseases: a control study.

Authors:  Liang Zhong; Qiu-Ying Yao; Lei Li; Jian-Rong Xu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  [Comparison of 2D and 3D sequences for MRCP. Clinical value of the different techniques].

Authors:  A M Wallnoefer; K A Herrmann; U Beuers; C J Zech; S Gourtsoyianni; M F Reiser; S O Schoenberg
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  Use of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: prospective comparison with a reference imaging method.

Authors:  S H Zidi; F Prat; O Le Guen; Y Rondeau; L Rocher; J Fritsch; A D Choury; G Pelletier
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 5.  Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  P W Bearcroft; D J Lomas
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Yield of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the investigation of bile duct dilatation in asymptomatic patients.

Authors:  Shlomit Tamir; Marius Braun; Assaf Issachar; Gil N Bachar; Ofer Benjaminov
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 4.623

7.  Short- versus long-sequence MRI cholangiography for the preoperative imaging of the common bile duct in patients with cholecystolithiasis.

Authors:  A Shamiyeh; E Lindner; J Danis; K Schwarzenlander; W Wayand
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-05-26       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Performance characteristics of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the staging of malignant hilar strictures.

Authors:  S H Zidi; F Prat; O Le Guen; Y Rondeau; G Pelletier
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Use of multislice helical computed tomography cholangiography in the diagnosis of biliary disease.

Authors:  K Izuishi; Y Toyama; F Goda; K Ishimura; Y Karasawa; H Usuki; H Maeta
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-05-13       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  MRCP compared to diagnostic ERCP for diagnosis when biliary obstruction is suspected: a systematic review.

Authors:  Eva C Kaltenthaler; Stephen J Walters; Jim Chilcott; Anthony Blakeborough; Yolanda Bravo Vergel; Steven Thomas
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2006-08-14       Impact factor: 1.930

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.