BACKGROUND: Glutamine synthetase is exclusively expressed in pericentral hepatocytes in mammalian liver, but its regulation mechanism is still largely unknown. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Heterogeneous expression of glutamine synthetase was examined in detail during mouse liver development by immunohistochemistry and by in situ hybridization. Heterogeneous expression of this enzyme was also analyzed in immature liver fragments transplanted to an ectopic site where no portal blood flow exists. RESULTS: At 18.5 days of gestation, a random, spotty distribution of low levels of glutamine synthetase mRNA was observed all over the liver parenchyma, but the enzyme protein was not detectable immunohistochemically in the liver at any fetal stage. Glutamine synthetase and its mRNA began to be heterogeneously expressed in pericentral hepatocytes 2 to 3 days after birth, when glycogen accumulation in the liver parenchyma was rather homogeneous. In the early postnatal development, a mosaic distribution of positive and negative hepatocytes with respect to glutamine synthetase protein and mRNA was noted around the central veins. Subsequently, mRNA distribution gradually became continuous, although some hepatocytes still lacked protein, indicating partial regulation at the translational level. When fetal liver fragments that had not yet heterogeneously expressed glutamine synthetase were cultured under the testis capsule of male mice, only pericentral hepatocytes expressed this enzyme after 2 months. However, the distribution of glutamine synthetase protein- and mRNA-positive hepatocytes around the central veins was patchy rather than continuous, as in perinatal livers. CONCLUSIONS: These results support the importance of local interactions of hepatocytes with intrahepatic cell populations and/or structural elements. Furthermore, they demonstrate that the capacity for the positional expression of glutamine synthetase is already established at a fetal age before expression of glutamine synthetase can be detected.
BACKGROUND:Glutamine synthetase is exclusively expressed in pericentral hepatocytes in mammalian liver, but its regulation mechanism is still largely unknown. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Heterogeneous expression of glutamine synthetase was examined in detail during mouse liver development by immunohistochemistry and by in situ hybridization. Heterogeneous expression of this enzyme was also analyzed in immature liver fragments transplanted to an ectopic site where no portal blood flow exists. RESULTS: At 18.5 days of gestation, a random, spotty distribution of low levels of glutamine synthetase mRNA was observed all over the liver parenchyma, but the enzyme protein was not detectable immunohistochemically in the liver at any fetal stage. Glutamine synthetase and its mRNA began to be heterogeneously expressed in pericentral hepatocytes 2 to 3 days after birth, when glycogen accumulation in the liver parenchyma was rather homogeneous. In the early postnatal development, a mosaic distribution of positive and negative hepatocytes with respect to glutamine synthetase protein and mRNA was noted around the central veins. Subsequently, mRNA distribution gradually became continuous, although some hepatocytes still lacked protein, indicating partial regulation at the translational level. When fetal liver fragments that had not yet heterogeneously expressed glutamine synthetase were cultured under the testis capsule of male mice, only pericentral hepatocytes expressed this enzyme after 2 months. However, the distribution of glutamine synthetase protein- and mRNA-positive hepatocytes around the central veins was patchy rather than continuous, as in perinatal livers. CONCLUSIONS: These results support the importance of local interactions of hepatocytes with intrahepatic cell populations and/or structural elements. Furthermore, they demonstrate that the capacity for the positional expression of glutamine synthetase is already established at a fetal age before expression of glutamine synthetase can be detected.
Authors: Michael G Dorrington; Emily Speranza; Anita Gola; Claudia Sala; Rochelle M Shih; Andrea J Radtke; Harikesh S Wong; Antonio P Baptista; Jonathan M Hernandez; Gastone Castellani; Iain D C Fraser; Ronald N Germain Journal: Nature Date: 2020-11-25 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Lay Teng Ang; Antson Kiat Yee Tan; Matias I Autio; Su Hua Goh; Siew Hua Choo; Kian Leong Lee; Jianmin Tan; Bangfen Pan; Jane Jia Hui Lee; Jen Jen Lum; Christina Ying Yan Lim; Isabelle Kai Xin Yeo; Chloe Jin Yee Wong; Min Liu; Jueween Ling Li Oh; Cheryl Pei Lynn Chia; Chet Hong Loh; Angela Chen; Qingfeng Chen; Irving L Weissman; Kyle M Loh; Bing Lim Journal: Cell Rep Date: 2018-02-20 Impact factor: 9.423
Authors: Zoë D Burke; Karen R Reed; Sheng-Wen Yeh; Valerie Meniel; Owen J Sansom; Alan R Clarke; David Tosh Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2018-02-09 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Giora van Straten; Frank G van Steenbeek; Guy C M Grinwis; Robert P Favier; Anne Kummeling; Ingrid H van Gils; Hille Fieten; Marian J A Groot Koerkamp; Frank C P Holstege; Jan Rothuizen; Bart Spee Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-06-19 Impact factor: 3.240