Lay Teng Ang1, Antson Kiat Yee Tan2, Matias I Autio3, Su Hua Goh2, Siew Hua Choo2, Kian Leong Lee4, Jianmin Tan2, Bangfen Pan3, Jane Jia Hui Lee5, Jen Jen Lum6, Christina Ying Yan Lim2, Isabelle Kai Xin Yeo6, Chloe Jin Yee Wong6, Min Liu7, Jueween Ling Li Oh6, Cheryl Pei Lynn Chia6, Chet Hong Loh2, Angela Chen8, Qingfeng Chen9, Irving L Weissman8, Kyle M Loh8, Bing Lim10. 1. Stem Cell & Regenerative Biology Group, Genome Institute of Singapore, A(∗)STAR, Singapore 138672, Singapore. Electronic address: anglt1@gis.a-star.edu.sg. 2. Stem Cell & Regenerative Biology Group, Genome Institute of Singapore, A(∗)STAR, Singapore 138672, Singapore. 3. Human Genetics Group, Genome Institute of Singapore, A(∗)STAR, Singapore 138672, Singapore; Cardiovascular Research Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117599, Singapore. 4. Cancer and Stem Cell Biology Program, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore 169857, Singapore. 5. Stem Cell & Regenerative Biology Group, Genome Institute of Singapore, A(∗)STAR, Singapore 138672, Singapore; School of Biological Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 637551, Singapore. 6. Stem Cell & Regenerative Biology Group, Genome Institute of Singapore, A(∗)STAR, Singapore 138672, Singapore; School of Engineering, Temasek Polytechnic, Singapore 529757, Singapore. 7. Humanized Mouse Unit, Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, A(∗)STAR, Singapore 138673, Singapore. 8. Stanford Institute for Stem Cell Biology & Regenerative Medicine, Department of Developmental Biology, Stanford-UC Berkeley Siebel Stem Cell Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. 9. Humanized Mouse Unit, Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, A(∗)STAR, Singapore 138673, Singapore; Department of Microbiology, Yong Yoo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119228, Singapore. 10. Stem Cell & Regenerative Biology Group, Genome Institute of Singapore, A(∗)STAR, Singapore 138672, Singapore. Electronic address: limb1@gis.a-star.edu.sg.
Abstract
How are closely related lineages, including liver, pancreas, and intestines, diversified from a common endodermal origin? Here, we apply principles learned from developmental biology to rapidly reconstitute liver progenitors from human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs). Mapping the formation of multiple endodermal lineages revealed how alternate endodermal fates (e.g., pancreas and intestines) are restricted during liver commitment. Human liver fate was encoded by combinations of inductive and repressive extracellular signals at different doses. However, these signaling combinations were temporally re-interpreted: cellular competence to respond to retinoid, WNT, TGF-β, and other signals sharply changed within 24 hr. Consequently, temporally dynamic manipulation of extracellular signals was imperative to suppress the production of unwanted cell fates across six consecutive developmental junctures. This efficiently generated 94.1% ± 7.35% TBX3+HNF4A+ human liver bud progenitors and 81.5% ± 3.2% FAH+ hepatocyte-like cells by days 6 and 18 of hPSC differentiation, respectively; the latter improved short-term survival in the Fah-/-Rag2-/-Il2rg-/- mouse model of liver failure.
How are closely related lineages, including liver, pancreas, and intestines, diversified from a common endodermal origin? Here, we apply principles learned from developmental biology to rapidly reconstitute liver progenitors from human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs). Mapping the formation of multiple endodermal lineages revealed how alternate endodermal fates (e.g., pancreas and intestines) are restricted during liver commitment. Human liver fate was encoded by combinations of inductive and repressive extracellular signals at different doses. However, these signaling combinations were temporally re-interpreted: cellular competence to respond to retinoid, WNT, TGF-β, and other signals sharply changed within 24 hr. Consequently, temporally dynamic manipulation of extracellular signals was imperative to suppress the production of unwanted cell fates across six consecutive developmental junctures. This efficiently generated 94.1% ± 7.35% TBX3+HNF4A+ human liver bud progenitors and 81.5% ± 3.2% FAH+ hepatocyte-like cells by days 6 and 18 of hPSC differentiation, respectively; the latter improved short-term survival in the Fah-/-Rag2-/-Il2rg-/- mouse model of liver failure.
A quintessential goal of developmental biology is to understand how stem cells and progenitors commit to a singular lineage among multiple alternate fate choices (Graf and Enver, 2009). For instance, multiple lineages including liver, pancreas, and intestines emanate from a common progenitor. Paradoxically, the formation of these lineages has been ascribed to a common set of signals (e.g., bone morphogenetic protein [BMP] and/or fibroblast growth factor [FGF]) based on pioneering genetic knockouts that demonstrated that these signals are broadly necessary for the development of each of these lineages in vivo (Bhushan et al., 2001; Chung et al., 2008; Jung et al., 1999; Rossi et al., 2001; Shin et al., 2007). This raises the question of how these lineages are diversified from one another. Often, we do not understand cell-type specification at a level of granularity to know what precise combinations of signals specify cell fate at any given time (Wandzioch and Zaret, 2009). However the differentiation of pluripotent stem cells (PSCs; including embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells) provides a reductionist system to reveal the minimal extracellular signals sufficient for specifying a given cell type from scratch. Hence, analogous to embryonic explant cultures (Gualdi et al., 1996; Serls et al., 2005), PSC differentiation might allow us to uncover the combinations and timings of signals that specify cell fate at a level of detail difficult to achieve in vivo. Here, we took the latter approach to better understand liver development; we demonstrate that liver commitment is executed by signals that exclude alternate lineage options in stepwise fashion across six consecutive lineage choices.Pluripotent cells develop into liver cells through multiple consecutive branching lineage choices, which have been partially delineated through studies of early vertebrate embryos (Duncan, 2003; Gordillo et al., 2015; Lemaigre, 2009; Lewis and Tam, 2006; Miyajima et al., 2014) but remain to be fully elucidated. In the early mouse embryo, the pluripotent epiblast (at embryonic day 5.5 [∼E5.5]) differentiates into the anterior primitive streak (∼E6.5) and, subsequently, the definitive endoderm germ layer (∼E7–E7.5) (Lawson et al., 1991; Tam and Beddington, 1987). Definitive endoderm is the common progenitor to epithelial cells in diverse internal organs, including the liver, pancreas, and intestines (Spence et al., 2009; Tremblay and Zaret, 2005) (Figure 1A).
Figure 1
Differentiation of Human Definitive Endoderm into Posterior Foregut
(A) Liver development in the mouse embryo between E5.5 to E9.5 depicting Mixl1+ primitive streak, Sox17+ definitive endoderm, Hnf4a+ foregut, and Tbx3+ liver bud progenitors.
(B) Overview of human PSC differentiation strategy in this study.
(C) Percentage of MIXL1-GFP+ cells using MIXL1-GFP knockin hESC reporter line (Loh et al., 2014).
(D) Percentage of SOX17-mCherry+ cells using SOX17-mCherry knockin hESC reporter line (Loh et al., 2014).
(E) Markers expressed in E9.5 mouse liver bud progenitors.
(F) Strategy to treat definitive endoderm (DE) with RA or TGF-β modulators on the day-2 to day-3 interval to produce day-3 posterior foregut (PFG) and assaying subsequent effects on liver bud gene expression by day 6, as shown in (H)–(J).
(G) Transient treatment on the day-2 to day-3 interval with ATRA or TTNPB markedly improves AFP expression in day-6 hPSC-derived liver bud progenitors on top of base media condition A83 + B + F (A83 + B + F: A8301, 1 μM; BMP4, 30 ng/mL; FGF2, 10 ng/mL), as shown by immunostaining with a DAPI nuclear counterstain. Scale bar, 1 mm.
(H) qPCR gene expression of day-5 liver bud cells generated from endoderm cells briefly treated on the day-2 to day-3 interval with a retinoid inhibitor (BMS: BMS493, 10 μM) or ATRA of varying doses (0.1 mM, 0.5 μM, 1 μM, or 2 μM) on top of base media condition A83 (A83: A8301, 1 μM).
(I) qPCR gene expression of day-6 liver bud cells generated from endoderm cells briefly treated on the day-2 to day-3 interval with a TGF-β inhibitor A83 (A83: A8301, 1 μM) or a TGF-β agonist (A10: ACTIVIN, 10 ng/mL) on top of base media condition ATRA (ATRA: 2 μM).
(J) qPCR gene expression of day-5 liver bud cells generated from endoderm cells briefly treated on the day-2 to day-3 interval with a BMP inhibitor DM (DM: DM3189, 250 nM) or a BMP agonist (B3: BMP4, 3 ng/mL) on top of base media condition RA + A83 (RA: ATRA, 2 μM; A83: A8301, 1 μM).
Shortly thereafter, by ∼E8.5, endoderm is patterned along the anterior-posterior axis to broadly form the anterior foregut, posterior foregut, and midgut/hindgut (Grapin-Botton, 2005; Zorn and Wells, 2009). By ∼E9.5, the posterior foregut gives rise to either pancreatic progenitors or the earliest liver progenitors–known as liver bud progenitors (Fukuda-Taira, 1981; Ledouarin, 1964; Rossi et al., 2001)–as shown by single-cell lineage tracing (Chung et al., 2008). Conversely, the midgut/hindgut gives rise to intestinal epithelium (Spence et al., 2011a). Subsequently, incipient ∼E9.5 liver bud progenitors are thought to differentiate over the course of several days into either hepatocytes or bile duct cells (cholangiocytes)–the two major epithelial constituents of the liver (Suzuki et al., 2008b). At birth, early hepatocytes already express characteristic genes (e.g., Albumin, Cps1, and Fah) (Cascio and Zaret, 1991; Chen et al., 2009) but diversify to form multiple functionally distinct hepatocyte subsets after birth (Colnot and Perret, 2011; Jungermann, 1995; Shiojiri et al., 1995; Spijkers et al., 2001), including periportal or pericentral hepatocytes that encircle, respectively, either portal or central veins (Smith and Campbell, 1988).There has been major headway in reconstituting enriched populations of hepatocyte-like cells from human PSCs (hPSCs) (Agarwal et al., 2008; Basma et al., 2009; Cai et al., 2007; Carpentier et al., 2014, 2016; Espejel et al., 2010; Han et al., 2012; Ogawa et al., 2013; Rashid et al., 2010; Si-Tayeb et al., 2010; Song et al., 2009; Touboul et al., 2010; Zhao et al., 2013). Put simply, the prevailing view is that, in order to generate hepatocyte-like cells from hPSCs, liver development should be divided into roughly three stages over several weeks or months. Current protocols to differentiate hPSCs toward liver generally commence with (1) ACTIVIN/transforming growth factor β (TGF-β (in the presence or absence of WNT) to initially induce endoderm; followed by (2) BMP and FGF to specify liver progenitors; and, finally, (3) hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), Oncostatin M (OSM), dexamethasone, and/or 3D reaggregation with other cell types to specify hepatocytes (Cai et al., 2007; Carpentier et al., 2014; Gouon-Evans et al., 2006; Ogawa et al., 2013; Rashid et al., 2010; Si-Tayeb et al., 2010; Song et al., 2009; Takebe et al., 2013; Touboul et al., 2010; Zhao et al., 2013). However, current three-step differentiation approaches may not precisely mirror liver development, as liver development from pluripotent cells in vivo likely entails more than three steps. Indeed, certain differentiation protocols generate impure populations containing a subset of hPSC-derived liver cells; upon transplantation, these impure populations yielded tumors (Haridass et al., 2009).Here, we reconstitute early liver development through a sequence of six consecutive lineage choices and detail the signals at each juncture that specify each cell type (either liver or non-liver lineages). This map of liver development allowed us to more precisely control differentiation: by mapping the generation of closely related endodermal lineages (liver, pancreatic, and midgut/hindgut progenitors), we developed a strategy to exclusively specify liver progenitors while suppressing formation of unwanted lineages (i.e., pancreas and midgut/hindgut). Strikingly, we also showed that multiple developmental signals (e.g., retinoid, TGF-β, Wnt, and other signals) have opposing effects within 24 hr, initially specifying one fate and then subsequently repressing its formation. The temporally dynamic action of these signals contrasts with how these signals are typically added for multiple days in some prevailing differentiation schema. Hence, manipulating signals in a temporally dynamic fashion enabled the faster production of 94.1 ± 7.35% HNF4A+ liver bud progenitors from hPSCs within 6 days. Importantly, the hPSC-derived liver bud progenitors produced could further differentiate into 81.5 ± 3.2% FAH+ hepatocyte-like cells, the latter of which could function in vitro and improve short-term survival in the Fah (FRG) mouse model of liver injury.Finally, we furnish tools to quantitatively track this liver differentiation process. These include cell-surface markers identifying liver progenitors (which we find to be CD99+CD184−CD10−) and a knockin reporter hPSC line to track the expression of metabolic enzyme FAH during hepatocyte differentiation.
Results
RA, BMP, and FGF Activation and TGF-β Inhibition Differentiate Endoderm into Posterior Foregut with the Competence to Later Generate Liver Bud Progenitors
Pluripotent cells first differentiate into primitive streak and, subsequently, definitive endoderm before turning into liver (Figure 1A). We previously identified signals to differentiate hPSCs into >99% pure MIXL1-GFP+ primitive streak cells in 24 hr (Figures 1B and 1C) and, subsequently, into >98% pure SOX17-mCherry+ definitive endoderm by day 2 of differentiation (Figures 1B and 1D) (Loh et al., 2014, 2016). These nearly pure day-2 endoderm populations, whose purity has been corroborated by other groups (Rostovskaya et al., 2015), provided an optimal starting point to examine signals that could further generate day-3 posterior foregut and, later, day-6 liver bud progenitors (Figure 1F). Since Tbx3, Afp, Prox1, Cebpa, Hnf4a, Hnf6, and Hnf1b (Jacquemin et al., 2003; Lokmane et al., 2008; Lüdtke et al., 2009; Shiojiri et al., 2004; Suzuki et al., 2008a) are expressed in E9.5 mouse liver bud progenitors (Figure 1E), their human homologs were used as markers to assess the generation of hPSC-derived liver bud progenitors.Current efforts to differentiate hPSC-derived endoderm into liver progenitors often continuously apply the same signals for several days (Carpentier et al., 2016; Si-Tayeb et al., 2010); by contrast, we found that two opposing groups of signals specified posterior foregut and, subsequently, liver bud progenitors. First, we determined that transient activation of the retinoic acid (RA), BMP, and FGF pathways together with inhibition of TGF-β signaling for 24 hr was critical to differentiate day-2 definitive endoderm into day-3 posterior foregut that was competent to later differentiate into liver bud progenitors.RA agonists initially promoted posterior foregut specification on day 3 of differentiation. Treatment of day-2 endoderm with the RA agonists all-trans RA (ATRA; 2 μM) or 4-[(E)-2-(5,6, 7,8-Tetrahydro-5,5,8,8-tetramethyl-2-naphthalenyl)-1-propenyl] benzoic acid (TTNPB) (75 nM) for24 hr enhanced the formation of day-3 posterior foregut that was later competent to differentiate into liver bud (Figures 1F–1H) and downstream hepatocytes (Figures S1A and S1B) on later days of differentiation. Thus, RA is crucial for human posterior foregut specification, consistent with the role for RA in generating foregut derivatives such as stomach endoderm in vitro (McCracken et al., 2014) and how inhibiting RA synthesis abrogates both liver and pancreas formation in zebrafish embryos (Stafford and Prince, 2002).Foregut specification by day 3 was also promoted by TGF-β inhibition (Figure 1I) and activation of the BMP (Figure 1J) and FGF pathways (Figures S1D and S1E). Unexpectedly, although BMP inhibition expanded the foregut domain in Xenopus and zebrafish (Rankin et al., 2011; Tiso et al., 2002), conversely, day-3 BMP inhibition reduced the competence of hPSC-derived foregut progenitors to later differentiate into liver bud progenitors (Figure 1J). Each of these 24-hr manipulations to initially generate foregut had far-reaching effects and enhanced the generation of posterior foregut that was capable of subsequently differentiating into liver bud progenitors and hepatocytes (Figures 1H–1J and S1A–S1C).Taken together, day-2 definitive endoderm could be converted into day-3 posterior foregut by the simultaneous activation of RA, BMP, and FGF pathways together with inhibition of TGF-β signaling for 24 hr. Such day-3 hPSC-derived posterior foregut expressed HHEX (Figure S1H), a marker of ∼E8.5 mouse ventral posterior foregut (Thomas et al., 1998).
TGF-β, BMP, and PKA Activation and WNT Inhibition Induce Differentiation of Foregut into Liver Bud Progenitors by Day 6 of Differentiation
Subsequent progression of day-3 hPSC-derived posterior foregut into day-6 liver bud progenitors required distinct signals (Figure 2A). Although day-3 posterior foregut was initially specified by RA activation and TGF-β inhibition, the subsequent differentiation of posterior foregut into day-6 liver bud progenitors was suppressed by continued RA activation and TGF-β inhibition. This highlights the temporally dynamic action of these signals. Instead, liver bud specification on days 4–6 required activation of the TGF-β, BMP, and protein kinase A (PKA) pathways, together with WNT inhibition, for 48–72 hr (Figure 2B).
Figure 2
Accelerated Generation of Human TBX3+HNF4A+AFP+ Liver Bud Progenitors by Day 6 of PSC Differentiation
(A) Development of liver bud in mouse embryos. Strategy to treat posterior foregut with RA, TGF-β, PKA, BMP, and WNT modulators on the day-4 to day-6 interval to produce day-6 liver bud progenitors and assaying effects on liver bud gene expression by day 6, as shown in (C)–(F).
(B) Temporally dynamic signals govern liver differentiation.
(C) qPCR gene expression of day-6 liver bud cells generated from endoderm treated on the day-4 to day-6 interval with a retinoid inhibitor (BMS: BMS493, 10 μM) or varying doses of a retinoid agonist (ATRA, 0.1 μM, 0.5 μM, 1 μM, and 2 μM) on top of base media condition A83B10 (A83B10: A8301, 1 μM; BMP4, 10 ng/mL) and qPCR gene expression of day-6 hPSC-derived midgut/hindgut (MHG) or pancreatic endoderm (PAN) cells.
(D) qPCR gene expression of day-6 liver bud cells generated from endoderm treated on the day-4 to day-6 interval with a TGF-β inhibitor (A83: A8301, 1 μM) or ACTIVIN (10 ng/mL) on top of base media condition B10 (B10: BMP4, 10 ng/mL). Day-6 hPSC-derived pancreatic endoderm (PAN) or midgut/hindgut cells were included as controls.
(E) qPCR gene expression of day-5 liver bud cells generated from endoderm treated on the day-4 to day-5 interval with a BMP inhibitor (DM: DM3189, 250 nM) or varying doses of BMP4 (B, 10–100 ng/mL) in the presence of base media condition A10 (A10: ACTIVIN at 10 ng/mL). Midgut/hindgut denotes hPSC-derived midgut/hindgut cells.
(F) Gene expression of day-6 liver bud cells after 2-day treatment of PKA inhibitor (RpCAMP, 100 μM) or PKA agonist (BrCAMP, 1 mM) in the presence of base media condition A83B10 (A83B10: A8301, 1 μM; BMP4, 10 ng/mL) during a day-4 to day-5 interval and day-6 hPSC-derived midgut/hindgut, as shown by qPCR.
(G) Percentage of day-6 liver bud progenitors positive for AFP from the differentiation of 3 hPSC lines (H1, H7, and H9) as shown by intracellular FACS.
(H) Day-6H1hPSC-derived liver progenitors generated using SR2 were immunostained for AFP, HNF4A, and TBX3 with a DAPI nuclear counterstain. Scalebar, 500 μm.
(I) Gene expression of day-6 liver progenitors, pancreatic endoderm, and midgut/hindgut progenitors derived from hPSCs for HNF1A, PDX1, and CDX2.Error bars represent ± SE.
While RA initially differentiated endoderm into day-3 posterior foregut (discussed earlier), 24 hr later, it repressed subsequent progression into liver bud progenitors and promoted formation of ODD1+ stomach endoderm on days 4–6 (Figure 2C). Hence, our findings reconcile conflicting findings that RA is, overall, required for zebrafish liver induction (Stafford and Prince, 2002) but that RA-coupled beads inhibit liver bud marker formation in Hamburger Hamilton Stage 10 (HH10)-stage zebrafish embryos (Bayha et al., 2009); there is a temporally dynamic requirement for RA in liver bud specification.Akin to RA signaling, the role for TGF-β in liver specification was also temporally dynamic: TGF-β inhibition initially promoted foregut formation by day 3 (Figure 1I), but 24 hr later, TGF-β activation promoted liver bud specification on days 4–6, leading to enhanced liver bud marker expression by day 6 (Figure 2D). Emphasizing the importance of TGF-β activation, we found that TGF-β inhibition at this stage abrogated the differentiation of foregut into liver bud (Figure 2D), contrasting with earlier use of TGF-β inhibitors to differentiate hPSC-derived endoderm into liver (Loh et al., 2014; Sampaziotis et al., 2015; Touboul et al., 2010).BMP and PKA activation, together with WNT blockade, also cooperated with TGF-β activation to differentiate day-3 foregut into day-6 liver bud progenitors. Consistent with earlier findings (Chung et al., 2008; Rossi et al., 2001; Shin et al., 2007; Si-Tayeb et al., 2010; Wandzioch and Zaret, 2009; Zhao et al., 2013), first, we found that BMP or FGF activation differentiated foregut into liver bud while blocking pancreas formation (Figures 2E, S2D, and S2E); by contrast, BMP or FGF inhibition suppressed liver formation (Figures 2E, S2D, and S2E). This mirrors how bmp2b overexpression promotes liver specification at the expense of pancreatic progenitors in zebrafish embryos (Chung et al., 2008) and how BMP induces liver from mouse embryonic endoderm explants (Rossi et al., 2001). Second, we found that PKA agonists (e.g., 8-bromo-cAMP) also potently specified liver bud from foregut (Figure 2F), supporting the notion that prostaglandin E2 specifies zebrafish liver progenitors by activating the PKA cascade (Nissim et al., 2014). Finally, WNT inhibition (using C59) from days 4 to 5 suppressed midgut/hindgut (MHG; posterior endoderm) formation (Figures S1F and S1G) and, instead, transiently promoted the formation of liver bud progenitors that had the ability to subsequently form hepatocytes (Figures S2B and S2C). This is consistent with how WNT blocks foregut formation and, instead, specifies midgut/hindgut in Xenopus (McLin et al., 2007) but subsequently promotes proliferation of liver progenitors (Sekine et al., 2006). In summary, we showed that simultaneous activation of TGF-β, BMP, and PKA—but transient suppression of WNT—drove day-3 posterior foregut into day-6 liver bud progenitors while simultaneously blocking pancreatic and midgut/hindgut differentiation.This approach rapidly generated an 85.8%, a 92%, and an 89.2% pure AFP+ liver bud progenitor population by day 6 of differentiation from the H1, H7, and H9hPSC lines, respectively (Figures 2G and 2H). Day-6 liver bud progenitors expressed liver bud transcription factors HNF4A, TBX3, HNF6, and CEBPA, which were low or undetectable in midgut/hindgut (Figures 2C – 2F and S2A). Reciprocally, hPSC-derived liver bud progenitors did not express CDX or HOX genes (Figures 2I and S2A), which are markers of the midgut/hindgut, a developmentally related lineage that emanates from adjacent posterior endoderm and is also specified by BMP and FGF signals (Sherwood et al., 2011; Spence et al., 2011b). Dorsal (MNX1), stomach (ODD1), and pancreatic (PDX1) endoderm markers were low or undetectable in hPSC-derived liver bud progenitors in comparison to hPSC-derived pancreatic endoderm or midgut/hindgut (Figure 2I).Taken together, though liver bud and midgut/hindgut (intestinal) progenitors are spatially adjacent in vivo, they are transcriptionally distinct lineages and can be produced in mutually exclusive signaling conditions in vitro from hPSCs. Importantly, while there is a common requirement for BMP and FGF in liver and midgut/hindgut specification, we revealed signals that uniquely specify liver, thus clarifying how these lineages become segregated from one another.Finally, this PSC-to-liver bud differentiation system was significantly more rapid and yielded higher expression of liver bud markers, compared to four extant liver differentiation methods (Avior et al., 2015; Carpentier et al., 2016; Chen et al., 2012; Si-Tayeb et al., 2010; Zhao et al., 2013) (Figures 3A–3C and S3C). By day 6 of hPSC differentiation, 94.1% ± 7.35% HNF4A+ pure liver bud progenitors were produced (Figure S3A), whereas HNF4A+ liver progenitors were typically formed on later days (by day 10–14) in other differentiation protocols (Carpentier et al., 2016; Hay et al., 2008; Si-Tayeb et al., 2010; Zhao et al., 2013). Hence the temporally dynamic manipulation of extracellular signals enables the efficient generation of human liver bud progenitors by day 6 of PSC differentiation, which is ∼2 times faster than extant methods.
Figure 3
High-Throughput Screening Identifies Liver-Specific Surface Markers during PSC Differentiation
(A) Schematic diagram of liver differentiation approaches including SR2 and other methods (Zhao et al., 2013; Si-Tayeb et al., 2010; Avior et al., 2015; Carpentier et al., 2016). Primitive-streak-inducing conditions: ACP, ACTIVIN + CHIR99201 + PI103 (Loh et al., 2014); AWH, ACTIVIN + Wnt3a + HGF (Avior et al., 2015); StemDiff, STEMdiff definitive endoderm differentiation kit. Endoderm-inducing condition: ADP, ACTIVIN + DM3189 + PI103 (Loh et al., 2014). Liver progenitors were analyzed at day 6 (Zhao et al., 2013; Si Tayeb et al., 2010) or day 7 (Avior et al., 2015; Carpentier et al., 2016), respectively, as described in the respective studies.
(B) qPCR gene expression of day-6H1 hPSC-derived liver progenitors generated using SR2 or other methods (Si-Tayeb et al., 2010; Zhao et al., 2013; Avior et al., 2015; Carpentier et al., 2016).
(C) Strategy to conduct high-throughput FACS screening of surface markers expressed on H7 hPSCs, day-2 H7 hPSC-derived endoderm, and day-6 H7 hPSC-derived liver bud progenitors.
(D) Venn diagram of surface markers expressed on hPSCs, day-2 hPSC-derived definitive endoderm, and day-6 hPSC-derived liver bud progenitors.
(E) hPSCs, hPSC-derived definitive endoderm, and liver bud progenitors stained for CD10, CD184, and CD99, as shown by live-cell FACS.
(F) Surface markers expressed on hPSC and day-2 hPSC-derived definitive endoderm and day-6 liver progenitors; summary of present work.
A Surface Marker Signature for hPSC-Derived Liver Bud Progenitors
To quantitatively track the time course of human liver bud progenitor specification at the single-cell level, we next sought to identify lineage-specific cell-surface markers for day-0 hPSCs, day-2 definitive endoderm, and day-6 liver bud progenitors. Systematically screening the expression of 242 cell-surface antigens on these 3 lineages revealed stage-specific surface markers (Figures 3C and 3D). First, CD10 was expressed in 92.6 ± 5.6% of undifferentiated hPSCs but was abruptly down-regulated upon differentiation, being expressed in <2% of cells in day-2 definitive endoderm or day-6 liver bud populations (Figures 3E and S3B; Table S1). Second, CD184/CXCR4 (a known definitive endoderm marker; D'Amour et al., 2005) was enriched in day-2 definitive endoderm in comparison to day-0 hPSCs and day-6 liver bud progenitors (Figure 3E; Table S1). Finally, CD99 was highly expressed on day-6 liver bud progenitors by comparison to preceding hPSCs or definitive endoderm (DE) (Figures 3C and 3D; Table S1). This pattern was consistent across a panel of 4 hPSC lines (H7, HES2, H1, and BJC1; Figure S3B; Table S1). Thus, a CD99hiCD10−CD184lo/− surface marker profile may be used to track the early specification of, and enrich for, hPSC-derived liver bud progenitors (Figure 3F).
Segregation of Human Liver Bud Progenitors into Hepatocyte versus Biliary Fates by Competing NOTCH, TGF-β, PKA, and Other Signals
Next, we identified signals that induced the bifurcation of hPSC-derived day-6 liver bud progenitors into ALBUMIN+ hepatocyte-like cells or SOX9+ biliary cells (cholangiocytes) (Figures 4A and 4B) on later days of differentiation. Activation of NOTCH and TGF-β, together with insulin, upregulated SOX9, thus differentiating day-6 liver bud progenitors into CK7+/CK19+ biliary progenitors by day 12 of hPSC differentiation (Figures 4B and S4H) (Ogawa et al., 2015; Sampaziotis et al., 2015) while reducing formation of ALBUMIN+ hepatocyte-like cells (Figures 4C and 4D). Conversely, inhibition of NOTCH and TGF-β consolidated hepatocyte commitment by inhibiting diversion into the SOX9+ biliary fate (Figures 4C and 4D). This suggests the bipotent capacity of liver bud progenitors at a population level to give rise to either hepatic or biliary fates (which remains to be formally demonstrated in vivo by single-cell lineage tracing) and identifies the signals that control the mutually exclusive allocation of ALBUMIN+ hepatocyte-like versus SOX9+ cholangiocyte lineages.
Figure 4
Generation of Enriched Populations of ALBUMIN+ and FAH+ Immature Hepatocytes by Day 18 of PSC Differentiation
(A) Diagram depicting liver development in mouse embryos between E9.5 and birth and the expression of various liver genes. dpc, days post-coitum.
(B) A schematic of the present work showing the differentiation of human liver bud progenitors into bile duct cells or hepatocytes. A8301, TGF-β inhibitor; DAPT, Notch inhibitor; FSK, forskolin; AAP, ascorbic acid-2-phosphate.
(C and D) qPCR gene expression of day-6 hPSC-derived liver bud (LB) progenitors before and after 2-day treatment of 10 μM DAPT in the absence or presence of (C) 10 μM dexamethasone (Dex) or (D) a TGF-β inhibitor (A83: A83-01, 1 μM) or ACTIVIN (10, 30, or 50 ng/mL) on top of base media condition.
(E) ALBUMIN intracellular FACS analysis of hPSCs or day-18 hepatocytes derived from hPSC lines H1, H7, and H9.
(F) Global microarray gene expression of hPSCs, day-2 definitive endoderm, day-6 liver bud (LB) progenitors, and day-12 hPSC-derived hepatic progenitors that were either induced using the full combination (base) or with the individual omission of either DAPT, forskolin, ascorbic acid-2-phosphate, or insulin during the liver bud → hepatic progenitor differentiation step to reveal genes whose expression is regulated by DAPT, FSK, AAP, and insulin (INS). 4 biological replicates were used for the microarray analyses.
(G) ALBUMIN levels detected in culture medium grown with hPSC-derived or primary adult human hepatocytes as measured by ELISA with a human-specific ALBUMIN antibody; “Base” denotes culture medium alone.
(H) CYP3A4 activity of hPSCs, HepG2, and hPSC-derived hepatocytes (Day-18 Hep), as measured by P450-Glo luciferase assays and abolished by CYP3A4 inhibitor ketoconazole; signal is further normalized to cell number baseline, as measured by CellTiter-Glo.
Error bars represent ± SE.
Beyond expression of pan-hepatocyte marker ALBUMIN, we sought to identify signals that would upregulate the expression of various metabolic enzymes in hPSC-derived hepatocytes. This is important because hPSC-derived hepatocytes are often less metabolically functional than primary human hepatocytes (Camp et al., 2017; Carpentier et al., 2016). In particular, we sought to promote expression of tyrosine metabolism pathway components, as genetic deficiency of tyrosine metabolic enzymes (e.g., fumarylacetoacetate hydrolase [FAH]) results in hereditary tyrosinemia in humanpatients, a metabolic disorder (St-Louis and Tanguay, 1997). High insulin levels, together with a stabilized ascorbic acid derivative (ascorbic acid-2-phosphate [AAP]) greatly promoted the expression of tyrosine metabolic pathway genes PAH, HGD, HPD, TAT, MAI, and FAH and other liver markers by 18 days of differentiation (Figures S4C and S4F). PKA agonists (e.g., 8-bromo-cAMP and forskolin) also had a similar effect (Figure S4D). Microarray profiling showed that treatment with NOTCH inhibitor, AAP, forskolin, or insulin upregulated genes associated with gene ontology classifications pertaining to metabolic processes (Figures 4F and S4I; Table S5), asserting that these individual manipulations each promote the metabolic competence of hPSC-derived hepatocytes.Combining these signals efficiently generated ALBUMIN+ hepatocyte-like cells by day 18 of differentiation, which displayed various hepatocyte functions in vitro. First, provision of the aforementioned hepatocyte-specifying signals, together with transient inhibition of cholangiocyte-specifying signals TGF-β and NOTCH, yielded 88.7%, 77.3%, and 95.9% pure ALBUMIN+ hepatocyte-like cells from the H1, H7, and H9hPSC lines, respectively (Figures 4E and S4K), as assessed by intracellular flow cytometry after 18 days of hPSC differentiation. Second, day-18 hPSC-derived hepatocytes secreted ALBUMIN and FIBRINOGEN proteins into the medium (5.89 ± 0.71 μg/mL and 1.38 ± 0.26 μg/mL, respectively [Figures 4G and S4L]) in the same order of magnitude as the amount secreted by hepatocytes in vivo in human beings (Bernardi et al., 2012; Tennent et al., 2007). Third, hPSC-derived hepatocyte-like cells possessed CYP3A4 enzymatic activity at levels 5.9-fold higher than those of HepG2 cells, although they were still 55-fold lower than in primary adult human hepatocytes (Figure 4H). Fourth, they stained positive for periodic acid Schiff (implying glycogen storage; Figure S4M) as well as the liver-specific surface marker ASGR1 (Figure S4J). Fifth, this differentiation approach yielded significantly higher expression of hepatocyte markers (Figures S5A–S5C), including ALBUMIN, AAT, and CPS1 within 18 days when compared with other methods (Si-Tayeb et al., 2010; Zhao et al., 2013) at the same time point (Figure 5A), as revealed by wide-field imaging of entire wells of differentiated cells (Figure 5B).
Figure 5
Generation of a FAH-2A-Clover Knockin H1 hPSC Reporter Line Using CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Gene Editing
(A) Schematic diagram of liver differentiation approaches, including SR2 or other methods (Zhao et al., 2013; Si-Tayeb et al., 2010). Primitive-streak-inducing conditions: ACP, ACTIVIN + CHIR99201 + PI103 (Loh et al., 2014). Endoderm-inducing condition: ADP, ACTIVIN + DM3189 + PI103 (Loh et al., 2014). Hepatocyte-inducing condition: BODFsRAI, BMP4 + OSM + dexamethasone (Dex) + forskolin + Ro4929097 + AA2P + insulin. For detailed methods, see Supplemental Information.
(B) Day-18 hepatocyte-like cells generated by 3 methods (SR2 [the method described in the present work] or previously reported methods [Si-Tayeb et al., 2010; Zhao et al., 2013]) were immunostained for carbamoyl phosphate synthetase 1 (CPS1), ALBUMIN (ALB), and Alpha-1 anti-trypsin (AAT) with a DAPI nuclear counterstain, and multiple fields were stitched into 1 image.
(C) Schematic illustration of the strategy to insert a P2A-Clover reporter cassette into the FAH locus. A Gly-Ser-Gly (gsg) sequence was added to the start of the P2A sequence; eSpCas9, enhanced specificity Cas9; PGK1, Phosphoglycerate kinase 1 promoter; Blast, Blasticidin drug resistance gene.
(D) Wild-type and knockin alleles of the FAH locus sequenced by PCR.
(E) FACs analysis of the day-18 hPSC-derived hepatocyte-like population revealed that it was 83.7% FAH-Clover+.
(F) FACS-sorted FAH-Clover+ day-18 H1-derived hepatocyte-like cells (green bars) were significantly enriched for liver genes FAH, ALBUMIN, and HGD mRNAs when compared with FAH-Clover− cells (black bars) as shown by qPCR. Consistent results were obtained across multiple independent FAH-2A-Clover knockin H1 hPSC reporter clones (#1-3).
Error bars represent ± SE.
Given that previous differentiation protocols yielded hPSC-derived hepatocyte-like cells also displaying some extent of in vitro functionality (Espejel et al., 2010; Ogawa et al., 2013; Rashid et al., 2010; Si-Tayeb et al., 2010; Takebe et al., 2013; Zhao et al., 2013), we focused next on expression of tyrosine metabolic pathway enzymes including FAH (Figures S4A–S4G). Tyrosine metabolism is an important function executed by hepatocytes, and expression of tyrosine metabolic enzymes in hPSC-derived hepatocytes is pertinent to the treatment of the FRG mouse model of hereditary tyrosinemia (described later).To track the expression of FAH at a single-cell level in hPSC-derived hepatocytes, we used CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing to generate a FAH-2A-Clover knockin H1 hESC reporter line in which the FAH coding sequence was left intact (Figures 5C, 5D, and S5D–S5J). Applying the aforementioned differentiation protocol to FAH-2A-Clover hESCs revealed that 81.5 ± 3.2% of day-18 hepatocyte-like cells were FAH-Clover+ (Figure 5E). Attesting to the faithfulness of the reporter, FACS (fluorescence-activated cell sorting)-sorted Clover+ day-18 cells were significantly enriched for FAH, ALBUMIN, and HGD mRNAs by comparison to Clover− cells (Figure 5F). The expression of FAH in the majority of hPSC-derived day-18 hepatocyte-like cells motivated us to test whether these populations could be used to treat the FRG mouse model of liver injury.
hPSC-Derived Hepatocytes Engraft the Injured Mouse Liver and Improve Survival during Liver Injury
Finally, we tested whether FAH+ day-18 hPSC-derived hepatocyte-like cells derived using our differentiation schema could engraft injured FRG mice. FRG mice are an immunodeficient mouse model of tyrosinemia type I, an inherited liver failure syndrome caused by FAH mutations in patients (Labelle et al., 1993; St-Louis and Tanguay, 1997). Like humanpatients, FRG mice suffer chronic and, eventually, fatal liver injury in the absence of a hepatoprotective drug, NTBC (Azuma et al., 2007; Overturf et al., 1996).To this end, day-18 hPSC-derived hepatocytes were doubly labeled with constitutively expressed genetic reporters (EF1A-BCL2-2A-GFP and UBC-tdTomato-2A-Luciferase; Loh et al., 2016) and then were intrahepatically injected into neonatal FRG mice (less than 2 days old). Injected mice were allowed to grow until 6 weeks of age before liver injury was induced by cyclical withdrawal of hepatoprotective drug NTBC (Figure S6A) (Azuma et al., 2007; Overturf et al., 1996; Zhu et al., 2014) (Figure 6A). Strikingly, hPSC-derived hepatocytes engrafted in 7 out of 15 mice (Figure 6B) and continued to expand in vivo as shown by an increase in bioluminescence intensity over time (Figures 6B, S6B, and S6E). After ∼10 weeks of liver injury, all surviving mice had detectable bioluminescence (indicating the presence of transplanted cells); mice that initially had little/no bioluminescence had died by this time point (Figure 6B). This suggests that engrafted hPSC-derived hepatocytes promoted the survival of the FRG mice. In mice that survived 5 months post-transplantation, humanALBUMIN+ tdTomato+ liver cells resided near the liver vasculature (Figures S6C and S6D).
Figure 6
Human PSC-Derived Hepatocytes Engraft Neonatal and Adult Fah–/–
Rag2–/–
Ilr2g–/– Mice and Improve Short-Term Survival
(A) Strategy to inject hPSC-derived hepatocytes into the livers of neonatal FRG mice (0–72 hr old) or adult Fah–/–Rag2–/–Ilr2g–/– (FRG) mice (4–6 weeks old) and to subsequently induce liver injury; H9 EF1A-BCL2-2A-GFP; UBC-tdTomato-2A-Luciferase hPSCs (Loh et al., 2016) were used to generate hepatocytes for injections.
(B) Bioluminescent imaging of adult FRG mice that were intrahepatically injected with Luciferase+day-18 hPSC-derived hepatocytes while they were neonates. Liver injury was induced at weeks 4 to 6 by withdrawing NTBC; the remaining mice at 3 or 10 weeks post-injury are shown.
(C) Adult FRG mice were injected with Luciferase+ day-18 hPSC-derived hepatocytes. Kaplan-Meier's survival curves depicting the percent survival (after NTBC withdrawal) of adult FRG mice that had either been injected with day-18 hPSC-derived hepatocytes (n = 11), primary adult human hepatocytes (red line; n = 5), or media-only control (blue line; n = 12); Mantel-Cox log-rank test, *p < 0.05, from 3 independent experiments.
(D) Adult FRG mice were intrasplenically injected with day-18 hPSC-derived or primary adult human hepatocytes and NTBC was withheld. One month later, engrafted livers stained positive for human ALBUMIN (brown; at 5× or 20× magnifications), as shown by immunostaining. Scale bars, 200 μm. Image is representative of 5 livers.
(E) In vivo secretion of human serum ALBUMIN secretion into the bloodstream in vivo by hPSC-derived or primary adult human hepatocytes, as measured by ELISA, 1 month post-transplant.
(F) Reduction of bilirubin levels in the serum of mice transplanted with hPSC-derived or primary adult human hepatocytes versus negative or no-cell media-only control, 1 month post-transplant.
Error bars represent ± SE.
We further tested the ability of day-18 hPSC-derived hepatocytes to ameliorate liver failure in a second mouse model by intrasplenically transplanting them into 4- to 6-week-old adult FRG mice (Figure S6E) and inducing chronic liver injury by intermittent NTBC withdrawal (Figure 6A). Primary adult human hepatocytes were transplanted as positive controls. 72.7% of the FRG mice transplanted with hPSC-derived hepatocytes survived longer, compared to negative control mice that were not injected with any cells (Figures 6C and S6F). 1 month post-transplantation of hPSC-derived hepatocyte-like cells, humanALBUMIN+ liver cells were detected in the mouse liver, some of which were localized near the vasculature (Figure 6D). Mice transplanted with either hPSC-derived hepatocyte-like cells (n = 7 mice) or primary human hepatocytes (n = 5 mice) had, on average, 120 ± 36 ng/mL and 2.06 μg/mL of humanALBUMIN protein in mouse bloodstream 1 month post-transplantation (Figure 6E). This indicated that engrafted hPSC-derived hepatocytes secreted ALBUMIN into the bloodstream, albeit ∼18-fold less than human adult hepatocytes (Figure 6E). Finally, bilirubin levels (reflecting the extent of liver injury) were reduced in the serum of mice transplanted with hPSC-derived or primary human hepatocytes (Figure 6F). Together, these results indicated that transplanted hPSC-derived hepatocytes engrafted the injured adult mice liver; secreted humanALBUMIN protein into the bloodstream; and most importantly, improved short-term survival in the FRG mouse model of hereditary tyrosinemia. Ultimately, this demonstrates that hPSC-derived hepatocyte-like cells are functional to some extent, in turn validating the signaling code used for their production.
Discussion
A Roadmap for Efficient Human Liver Differentiation and Blockade of Non-liver Fates
How do stem cells and progenitors exclusively commit to a single lineage amidst multiple fate options? Here, we have explored the signaling logic underlying how closely related lineages, including liver, pancreas, and intestines, arise from a common endodermal origin. Previous pathfinding PSC-to-liver differentiation studies focused solely on liver differentiation and mostly used prolonged BMP and FGF to induce liver from endoderm (Gouon-Evans et al., 2006; Shiraki et al., 2008; Si-Tayeb et al., 2010; Spence et al., 2011b; Touboul et al., 2010; Zhao et al., 2013). However, multiple endodermal lineages share a common requirement for BMP or FGF (Bhushan et al., 2001; Chung et al., 2008; Jung et al., 1999; Rossi et al., 2001; Shin et al., 2007); hence, it was unclear how these related endodermal lineages were distinguished from one another. Here, we demonstrate that mapping the parallel formation of multiple endodermal lineages provides insight into liver commitment and powerfully enables the rational suppression of unwanted, non-liver lineages during hPSC differentiation.Our provisional roadmap for human liver development from PSCs (Figure 7) delineates a signaling code for liver development significantly extending beyond the use of prolonged BMP and FGF and illuminates several key features. First, it clarifies how hepatocyte commitment is accomplished in stepwise fashion through signals that exclude alternate fate options (i.e., intestines, pancreas, and cholangiocytes) across different lineage branchpoints. Second, it reveals that extracellular signals act in a temporally dynamic fashion, being re-interpreted within 24 hr to exert diametrically opposing effects on liver commitment. Third, it encompasses lineage-specific surface markers useful in tracking successive steps of hepatocyte commitment. This roadmap enables one to logically and dynamically manipulate extracellular signals to systematically restrict the formation of non-liver cell types. Consequently, it is possible to rapidly and efficiently generate hPSC-derived liver bud progenitors and hepatocyte-like cells, the latter of which can engraft in vivo and improve the survival of injured FRG mice. Our work relied on three fundamental principles to guide liver differentiation at the expense of other lineages.
Figure 7
A Signaling Roadmap to Efficiently Generate Human Liver Cells from PSCs
Summary of the present work. Inh., inhibitor; hi., high; lo., low; Ascorbic, ascorbic acid-2-phosphate. Optionally, Wnt inhibitor was added on days 4–5, and TGF-β inhibitor was added on days 7–8. Surface markers expressed on hPSC, day-2 hPSC-derived definitive endoderm, and day-6 liver bud progenitors are detailed in Results and Figure 3.
Signals Inducing Liver versus Non-liver Fates
First, we determined the signals that specify liver fate and suppress unwanted, non-liver lineage(s) at each lineage branchpoint, thus revealing how alternate fate choices are suppressed in stepwise fashion at successive stages of hepatocyte commitment. This roadmap revealed that RA initially blocks intestinal fate during posterior foregut commitment; then BMP suppresses pancreatic fate during liver commitment; finally, dual TGF-β and NOTCH blockade extinguish cholangiocyte potential during hepatocyte commitment (Figure 7).With this knowledge, these lineage segregations could be efficiently negotiated by providing the relevant inductive signal(s) to drive differentiation toward the desired lineage while repressing the signal(s) that otherwise promoted the alternate fate (Loh et al., 2014). For example, at the pancreas-liver branchpoint, application of BMP (among other signals) specified liver bud precursors while inhibiting pancreatic fate, thus generating 94.1 ± 7.35% TBX3+HNF4A+ human liver bud progenitors by day 6 of hPSC differentiation. Later, NOTCH and TGF-β specified cholangiocytes, and thus, NOTCH and brief TGF-β inhibition drove liver bud precursors into 81.5 ± 3.2% FAH+ hepatocyte-like cells by day 18. While liver progenitors and hepatocytes have reportedly been efficiently generated from hPSCs (Avior et al., 2015; Carpentier et al., 2016; Ogawa et al., 2013; Si-Tayeb et al., 2010; Zhao et al., 2013), this approach to systematically block unwanted (non-liver) fates enables the accelerated derivation of liver precursors ∼2–3 times faster than was previously possible and helps provide a rational framework for their efficient generation.
Temporally Dynamic Signals Controlling Foregut and Liver Specification
Second, we detailed how temporally dynamic signals specified liver fate, initially promoting but later inhibiting liver fate. For instance, over a brief 24-hr interval, RA activation and TGF-β blockade were necessary to drive definitive endoderm into posterior foregut progenitors, but 24 hr later, they limited further progression of posterior foregut toward a liver bud fate. This helped explain how multiple endodermal lineages become diversified at successive developmental steps: the same signals are re-iteratively used to accomplish different ends. This also argues against the sustained application of these (and other) signals for multiple days, which may induce extraneous, unwanted lineages. Understanding the temporal dynamics with which these signals act is critical, as these signals must be manipulated with the same dynamism to guide efficient differentiation as cells pass through transient windows of inductive competence (Loh et al., 2014, 2016; Wang et al., 2015).
Tools for Tracking Liver Differentiation
Third, we also introduce tools to track the process of liver commitment: (1) the surface marker CD99, which, together with the absence of CD10 and CD184/CXCR4, identifies day-6 liver bud progenitors and (2) an FAH-Clover knockin reporter hESC line to track the subsequent generation of FAH+ hepatocyte-like cells.Taken together, the provisional early liver developmental roadmap (Figure 7) provides a framework to understand liver commitment at the expense of non-liver fates and may avail the as-yet-unrealized goal of generating fully functional hepatocytes. Recent progress has shown that liver transcription factor overexpression can reprogram fibroblasts into more mature hepatocytes (Huang et al., 2014; Sekiya and Suzuki, 2011; Song et al., 2016; Yu et al., 2013; Zhu et al., 2014). This implies that hepatic transcription factors, when overexpressed, can engender a more mature hepatocyte state. The hPSC-derived liver progenitors generated in the present study expressed significantly higher levels of hepatic transcription factors (Figure 3) than the liver cells produced by extant differentiation methods. Thus, these liver progenitors provide a fertile venue for subsequent liver maturation efforts and, perhaps, the assembly of enhanced 3D liver “organoids” (Camp et al., 2017; Ogawa et al., 2013; Takebe et al., 2013). Indeed, the hPSC-derived hepatocyte-like day-18 cells express a repertoire of hepatocyte markers and enzymes more highly when compared with cells derived with extant protocols. A coming challenge for developmental biology at-large will be to uncover the signal(s) that mature newly born differentiated cells in the embryo into fully fledged, functional cell types in neonates and adults (Tan et al., 2017), thus extending the reach of the present roadmap.
Experimental Procedures
hPSC Differentiation and Hepatocyte Culture
mTeSR1-grown hPSCs (H1, H7, and H9 [WiCell] and ESI035 [ESI BIO]) were seeded for differentiation as single cells using Accutase (Millipore) onto Geltrex-coated plates (Thermo Fisher), at a density of 40,000 cells per well of a 12-well plate. hPSCs were differentiated into anterior primitive streak and, subsequently, into definitive endoderm by treatment with definitive endoderm Induction Medium A for 24 hr, followed by definitive endoderm Induction Medium B for 24 hr (Thermo Fisher) (Loh et al., 2014, 2016). For detailed methods, see Supplemental Information.
Data and Software Availability
The accession number for the microarray data reported in this paper is GEO: GSE98324. Imaging data are available from the Mendeley dataset: https://doi. org/10.17632/xbtpc2pty4.1.
Authors: David C Hay; Debiao Zhao; Judy Fletcher; Zoë A Hewitt; Doris McLean; Alai Urruticoechea-Uriguen; James R Black; Cliff Elcombe; James A Ross; Roland Wolf; Wei Cui Journal: Stem Cells Date: 2008-01-31 Impact factor: 6.277
Authors: Yu-Fan Chen; Chien-Yu Tseng; Hsei-Wei Wang; Hung-Chih Kuo; Vincent W Yang; Oscar K Lee Journal: Hepatology Date: 2012-03-01 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Michael J Iannotti; Ryan MacArthur; Richard Jones; Dingyin Tao; Ilyas Singeç; Sam Michael; James Inglese Journal: ACS Chem Biol Date: 2019-02-14 Impact factor: 5.100
Authors: Julien G Roth; Kristin L Muench; Aditya Asokan; Victoria M Mallett; Hui Gai; Yogendra Verma; Stephen Weber; Carol Charlton; Jonas L Fowler; Kyle M Loh; Ricardo E Dolmetsch; Theo D Palmer Journal: Elife Date: 2020-11-10 Impact factor: 8.140
Authors: Giuseppe Pettinato; Mark F Coughlan; Xuejun Zhang; Liming Chen; Umar Khan; Maria Glyavina; Conor J Sheil; Paul K Upputuri; Yuri N Zakharov; Edward Vitkin; Antonino B D'Assoro; Robert A Fisher; Irving Itzkan; Lei Zhang; Le Qiu; Lev T Perelman Journal: Sci Adv Date: 2021-08-18 Impact factor: 14.136
Authors: Lika Drakhlis; Santoshi Biswanath; Clara-Milena Farr; Victoria Lupanow; Jana Teske; Katharina Ritzenhoff; Annika Franke; Felix Manstein; Emiliano Bolesani; Henning Kempf; Simone Liebscher; Katja Schenke-Layland; Jan Hegermann; Lena Nolte; Heiko Meyer; Jeanne de la Roche; Stefan Thiemann; Christian Wahl-Schott; Ulrich Martin; Robert Zweigerdt Journal: Nat Biotechnol Date: 2021-02-08 Impact factor: 54.908
Authors: Jeremy J Velazquez; Ryan LeGraw; Farzaneh Moghadam; Yuqi Tan; Jacquelyn Kilbourne; Joseph C Maggiore; Joshua Hislop; Silvia Liu; Davy Cats; Susana M Chuva de Sousa Lopes; Christopher Plaisier; Patrick Cahan; Samira Kiani; Mo R Ebrahimkhani Journal: Cell Syst Date: 2020-12-07 Impact factor: 10.304