Literature DB >> 7782736

Toward unbiased measurement of conscious and unconscious memory processes within the process dissociation framework.

Axel Buchner1, Edgar Erdfelder, Bianca Vaterrodt-Plünnecke.   

Abstract

L.L. Jacoby's (1991) process dissociation framework has been welcomed as a tool for differentiating controlled and automatic cognitive processes. Several variants of the original process dissociation measurement model are integrated in this article, and it is shown that the model ignores guessing and, hence, response bias. An extension of the original model is suggested that includes guessing parameters. The original model and the extended model are evaluated empirically. In 3 experiments using a yes-no recognition task, response bias was manipulated in various ways. The original model falsely attributes effects of response biases to either controlled or uncontrolled processes or to both. The extended model, in contrast, results in estimates of the contributions of controlled and uncontrolled memory processes that are relatively unaffected by response biases. The extended model is recommended as a measurement tool.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7782736     DOI: 10.1037//0096-3445.124.2.137

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  28 in total

1.  Further evidence on the similarity of memory processes in the process dissociation procedure and in source monitoring.

Authors:  M C Steffens; A Buchner; H Martensen; E Erdfelder
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-10

2.  Conscious and unconscious influences of memory for object location.

Authors:  J I Caldwell; M E Masson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-03

3.  Effects of divided attention on perceptual and conceptual memory tests: an analysis using a process-dissociation approach.

Authors:  M Schmitter-Edgecombe
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-05

4.  The origins of levels-of-processing effects in a conceptual test: evidence for automatic influences of memory from the process-dissociation procedure.

Authors:  Dafna Bergerbest; Yonatan Goshen-Gottstein
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-12

5.  Comparing techniques for estimating automatic retrieval: effects of retention interval.

Authors:  Daryl E Wilson; Keith D Horton
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-09

6.  Theoretical and empirical review of multinomial process tree modeling.

Authors:  W H Batchelder; D M Riefer
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-03

7.  The effect of midazolam on conscious, controlled processing: evidence from the process-dissociation procedure.

Authors:  Elliot Hirshman; Julia Fisher; Thomas Henthorn; Jason Arndt; Anthony Passannante
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-12

8.  The process-dissociation approach two decades later: convergence, boundary conditions, and new directions.

Authors:  Andrew P Yonelinas; Larry L Jacoby
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-07

Review 9.  False memories and fantastic beliefs: 15 years of the DRM illusion.

Authors:  David A Gallo
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-10

10.  Hierarchical modeling of contingency-based source monitoring: a test of the probability-matching account.

Authors:  Nina R Arnold; Ute J Bayen; Beatrice G Kuhlmann; Bianca Vaterrodt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.