Literature DB >> 7781719

Natural head position and natural head orientation: basic considerations in cephalometric analysis and research.

A Lundström1, F Lundström, L M Lebret, C F Moorrees.   

Abstract

Natural head position (NHP) provides the key for meaningful cephalometric analysis because an extracranial reference line is used instead of intracranial reference lines, known to be subject to considerable biological variation in their inclination. Although the principle of natural head position is being recognized in the orthodontic literature, its registration may contain an element of unavoidable error that requires correction. A new concept of natural head orientation (NHO) has been introduced to maximize the contribution of NHP to cephalometrics. It is defined as the head orientation of the subject perceived by the clinician, based on general experience, as the natural head position in a standing, relaxed body and head posture, when the subject is looking at a distant point at eye level. The present study was designed to determine the accuracy and validity of NHO, using lateral profile photographs cut in a circular shape, obtained from 27 orthodontic patients, 10-14 years old. Findings among four investigators showed a high correlation (r = 0.82-0.96), in orientating these profile photographs in estimated natural head position (NHP). Moreover, investigators showed good correlation (r = 0.57-0.84) in head orientation after a 3-week interval. Mean differences for the same period varied between 0.1 and 2.9 degrees. The validity of NHO was supported also by a panel investigation. Clinicians as well as auxiliary personnel can be trained to make a critical judgement of the recorded natural head position and correct head orientation, whenever indicated, to enhance the reliability of cephalometric analysis in clinical practice and research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7781719     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/17.2.111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  33 in total

1.  The relationship between 3D dentofacial photogrammetry measurements and traditional cephalometric measurements.

Authors:  Jose C Castillo; Grace Gianneschi; Demyana Azer; Amornrut Manosudprasit; Arshan Haghi; Neetu Bansal; Veerasathpurush Allareddy; Mohamed I Masoud
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Disc displacement and changes in condylar position.

Authors:  K Ikeda; A Kawamura
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Photographic Assessment of Cephalometric Measurements in Skeletal Class II Cases: A Comparative Study.

Authors:  Pooja Mehta; Roshan M Sagarkar; Silju Mathew
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-06-01

4.  There is variability in our perception of the standard head orientation.

Authors:  G N Hughes; J Gateño; J D English; J F Teichgraeber; J J Xia
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 2.789

5.  Digital live-tracking 3-dimensional minisensors for recording head orientation during image acquisition.

Authors:  Leonardo Koerich de Paula; James L Ackerman; Felipe de Assis Ribeiro Carvalho; Lindsey Eidson; Lucia Helena Soares Cevidanes
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.650

6.  In vivo comparison of conventional and cone beam CT synthesized cephalograms.

Authors:  Vandana Kumar; John Ludlow; Lucia Helena Soares Cevidanes; André Mol
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Head orientation in CBCT-generated cephalograms.

Authors:  Lucia Cevidanes; Ana E F Oliveira; Alexandre Motta; Ceib Phillips; Brandon Burke; Donald Tyndall
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  Precision of cephalometric landmark identification: cone-beam computed tomography vs conventional cephalometric views.

Authors:  John B Ludlow; Maritzabel Gubler; Lucia Cevidanes; André Mol
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.650

9.  Optimal antero-posterior position of the maxillary central incisors and its relationship to the forehead in adult African American females.

Authors:  Matthew P Gidaly; Timothy Tremont; Chee Paul Lin; Chung How Kau; Nada M Souccar
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Assessment of asymmetry in a normal occlusion sample and asymmetric patients with three-dimensional cone beam computed tomography: a study for a transverse reference plane.

Authors:  Je Uk Park; Yoon-Ah Kook; Yoonji Kim
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 2.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.