Literature DB >> 7781481

Fornix- vs. limbus-based flaps in combined phacoemulsification and trabeculectomy.

W C Stewart1, C M Crinkley, A N Carlson.   

Abstract

We studied prospectively the results of limbus-versus fornix-based flaps in patients undergoing combined trabeculectomy and phacoemulsification. We found no significant difference at six months postoperatively in the level of intraocular pressure between the limbus-(16.1 +/- 4.1 mm Hg) and fornix- (14.0 +/- 3.4 mm Hg, p = 0.161) based groups, or in the number of glaucoma medications (p = 0.0750). The highest intraocular pressure recorded within the first postoperative month was similar between groups (18.4 +/- 6.9 mm Hg for limbus and 18.5 +/- 5.5 mm Hg for fornix, p > 0.900). Postoperative bleb height, extent, and vascularity, as well as chamber depth were statistically similar between groups (p > 0.05). Postoperative complications were similar between groups. This study indicates that both fornix- and limbus-based flaps may be used safely and effectively when performing a trabeculectomy combined with phacoemulsification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7781481     DOI: 10.1007/bf01204611

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  10 in total

1.  Combined no-stitch phacoemulsification cataract extraction with foldable silicone intraocular implant and holmium laser sclerostomy followed by 5-FU injections.

Authors:  S Terry
Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg       Date:  1992-03

2.  The results of trabeculectomy surgery in african-american versus white glaucoma patients.

Authors:  W C Stewart; K K Reid; R A Pitts
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Comparison of a 3- and 6-mm incision in combined phacoemulsification and trabeculectomy.

Authors:  W A Lyle; J C Jin
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1991-02-15       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  Limbus-based versus fornix-based conjunctival flaps in trabeculectomy.

Authors:  R Reichert; W Stewart; M B Shields
Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg       Date:  1987-09

5.  Limbus- v fornix-based conjunctival flap in trabeculectomy. A long-term randomized study.

Authors:  J N Shuster; T Krupin; A E Kolker; B Becker
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1984-03

6.  Analyzing data from ordered categories.

Authors:  L E Moses; J D Emerson; H Hosseini
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1984-08-16       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Trabeculectomy using a fornix-based conjunctival flap and tightly sutured scleral flap.

Authors:  M H Luntz
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Limbal-based vs fornix-based conjunctival flaps in combined extracapsular cataract surgery and glaucoma filtering procedure.

Authors:  J F Murchison; M B Shields
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1990-06-15       Impact factor: 5.258

9.  Correlation between intraocular pressure control and progressive glaucomatous damage in primary open-angle glaucoma.

Authors:  L K Mao; W C Stewart; M B Shields
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1991-01-15       Impact factor: 5.258

10.  Limbal- vs fornix-based conjunctival trabeculectomy flaps.

Authors:  C E Traverso; K F Tomey; S Antonios
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1987-07-15       Impact factor: 5.258

  10 in total
  3 in total

Review 1.  Fornix-based versus limbal-based conjunctival trabeculectomy flaps for glaucoma.

Authors:  Alex B Theventhiran; Gene Kim; WenJeng Yao
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-08-26

Review 2.  Fornix-based versus limbal-based conjunctival trabeculectomy flaps for glaucoma.

Authors:  Christiane Al-Haddad; Marwan Abdulaal; Ahmad Al-Moujahed; Ann-Margret Ervin
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-11-25

3.  Fornix-based versus limbus-based conjunctival flap in trabeculectomy: a quantitative evaluation of the evidence.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Miao He; Minwen Zhou; Xiulan Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.