Literature DB >> 2346201

Limbal-based vs fornix-based conjunctival flaps in combined extracapsular cataract surgery and glaucoma filtering procedure.

J F Murchison1, M B Shields.   

Abstract

Extracapsular cataract extractions and posterior chamber intraocular lens implantations combined with glaucoma filtering procedures were done in 47 eyes of 43 consecutive patients who had coexisting cataract and glaucoma. A limbal-based conjunctival flap was used in 22 patients and a fornix-based flap was used in 25 patients; the surgical technique was otherwise identical in all patients. Patients were followed up for a minimum of six months (mean, 18 months). Long-term intraocular pressure control and visual acuity were similar in the two groups, although the limbal-based group had significantly better early postoperative intraocular pressure control. Because control of intraocular pressure during the early postoperative period is a principal benefit of combined cataract and glaucoma surgery, we prefer the limbal-based conjunctival flap.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2346201     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)72441-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  11 in total

1.  Phacotrabeculectomy.

Authors:  H J Beckers; K E De Kroon; R M Nuijts; C A Webers
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Comparison of fornix- and limbus-based conjunctival flaps in mitomycin C trabeculectomy with laser suture lysis in Japanese glaucoma patients.

Authors:  Takeo Fukuchi; Jun Ueda; Kiyoshi Yaoeda; Kieko Suda; Masaaki Seki; Haruki Abe
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 3.  Fornix-Based Versus Limbal-Based Conjunctival Trabeculectomy Flaps for Glaucoma: Findings From a Cochrane Systematic Review.

Authors:  Christiane E Al-Haddad; Marwan Abdulaal; Ahmad Al-Moujahed; Ann-Margret Ervin; Karine Ismail
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  Fornix- vs. limbus-based flaps in combined phacoemulsification and trabeculectomy.

Authors:  W C Stewart; C M Crinkley; A N Carlson
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.379

5.  No-stitch combined glaucoma cataract-surgery.

Authors:  U M Klemen
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Cataract extraction and lens implantation with and without trabeculectomy: an intrapatient comparison.

Authors:  J C Bobrow
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1998

Review 7.  Fornix-based versus limbal-based conjunctival trabeculectomy flaps for glaucoma.

Authors:  Alex B Theventhiran; Gene Kim; WenJeng Yao
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-08-26

Review 8.  Fornix-based versus limbal-based conjunctival trabeculectomy flaps for glaucoma.

Authors:  Christiane Al-Haddad; Marwan Abdulaal; Ahmad Al-Moujahed; Ann-Margret Ervin
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-11-25

9.  Visual and refractive outcome of one-site phacotrabeculectomy compared with temporal approach phacoemulsification.

Authors:  Daniela Vaideanu; Kaveri Mandal; Anthony Hildreth; Scott G Fraser; Peter S Phelan
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-09

10.  Fornix-based versus limbus-based conjunctival flap in trabeculectomy: a quantitative evaluation of the evidence.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Miao He; Minwen Zhou; Xiulan Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.