Literature DB >> 7777418

Programmable VT detection enhancements in implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy.

J Neuzner1, H F Pitschner, M Schlepper.   

Abstract

This report describes the distribution of automatically measured values of enhanced arrhythmia detection parameters such as "rate stability" and "rate onset" in various forms of spontaneous arrhythmia episodes in patients treated with a new, third-generation, tiered therapy implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). The study population consisted of 27 patients who received the Ventak PRxII cardioverter defibrillator, which provides extensive diagnostic options such as electrogram storage capabilities, and the ability to store measured values of additional arrhythmia detection parameters such as rate stability and rate onset during spontaneous arrhythmia episodes. During a follow-up period of 11.1 +/- 5.2 months, this device detected 264 arrhythmia episodes. The analysis of stored electrograms revealed 13 episodes of sinus tachycardia, 52 episodes of atrial tachyarrhythmias, and 201 episodes of monomorphic ventricular tachycardias (VTs). The mean measured values of rate stability and rate onset were: 2.2 +/- 0.9 msec, 0% in sinus tachycardias; 41.0 +/- 24.1 msec, 8.5% +/- 9.5% in atrial tachyarrhythmias; and 7.8 +/- 6.0 msec, 30.6% +/- 12.1% in monomorphic VTs. There was a wide zone of overlapping measured values for rate stability and rate onset in ventricular and nonventricular rhythms. No episode of VT showed a measured rate stability criterion > 35 msec. The subanalysis of arrhythmia episodes presenting with a heart rate < 160 beats/min revealed no episode of VT with a rate stability value > 24 msec. The calculated, rate dependent specificities for these programmed rate stability parameters in detecting VTs were 46.2% and 81.8%, respectively. The analysis of the rate onset algorithm revealed no comparable relationship between sensitivity and specificity in the detection of VTs.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7777418     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1995.tb02564.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  10 in total

Review 1.  [Cardiology update. I: Electrophysiology].

Authors:  P Weismüller; H J Trappe
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  1999-01-15

Review 2.  Implantable dual-chamber cardioverter-defibrillator-pacemaker.

Authors:  D Pfeiffer; M Mende; A Hagendorff
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Dual chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator benefits and limitations.

Authors:  K Fan; K Lee; C P Lau
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 4.  Methods of minimizing inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks.

Authors:  B Schaer; S Osswald
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.931

5.  Comparison of therapy detection times between implantable cardioverter defibrillators with standard dual- and single-chamber pacing.

Authors:  A Capucci; G Q Villani; F Groppi; D Aschieri; M Hull; M Kuehl
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.900

6.  R-wave detection by subcutaneous ECG. Possible use for analyzing R-R variability.

Authors:  P Fotuhi; W Combs; C Condie; H Theres; T Schneider; K Stangl; G Baumann
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 1.468

7.  [New algorithms for discrimination between supraventricular and ventricular tachyarrhythmias in patients with implantable cardioverter/defibrillator].

Authors:  J Neuzner; M Schlepper
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  1997-03

8.  Selecting dual chamber or single chamber implantable defibrillators: what is the golden rule?

Authors:  Massimo Santini; Renato Ricci
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2003-10-01

9.  2015 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on optimal implantable cardioverter-defibrillator programming and testing.

Authors:  Bruce L Wilkoff; Laurent Fauchier; Martin K Stiles; Carlos A Morillo; Sana M Al-Khatib; Jesœs Almendral; Luis Aguinaga; Ronald D Berger; Alejandro Cuesta; James P Daubert; Sergio Dubner; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; N A Mark Estes; Guilherme Fenelon; Fermin C Garcia; Maurizio Gasparini; David E Haines; Jeff S Healey; Jodie L Hurtwitz; Roberto Keegan; Christof Kolb; Karl-Heinz Kuck; Germanas Marinskis; Martino Martinelli; Mark McGuire; Luis G Molina; Ken Okumura; Alessandro Proclemer; Andrea M Russo; Jagmeet P Singh; Charles D Swerdlow; Wee Siong Teo; William Uribe; Sami Viskin; Chun-Chieh Wang; Shu Zhang
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2016-02-01

10.  Influence of myopotential interference on the Wavelet discrimination algorithm in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.

Authors:  Kazuya Mizukami; Hisashi Yokoshiki; Hirofumi Mitsuyama; Masaya Watanabe; Taro Tenma; Rui Kamada; Masayuki Takahashi; Ryo Sasaki; Motoki Maeno; Hiroyuki Tsutsui
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2016-10-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.