Literature DB >> 7776500

Identification of comatose patients at high risk for death or severe disability. SUPPORT Investigators. Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments.

M B Hamel1, L Goldman, J Teno, J Lynn, R B Davis, F E Harrell, A F Connors, R Califf, P Kussin, P Bellamy.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate a simple prognostic scoring system to identify patients in nontraumatic coma at high risk for poor outcomes using data available early in the hospital course.
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study.
SETTING: Five geographically diverse academic medical centers. PATIENTS: A total of 596 patients in nontraumatic coma enrolled in the Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatments (SUPPORT), including 247 in the model derivation set and 349 in the model validation set. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Death and severe disability by 2 months. MAIN
RESULTS: For the 596 patients studied (median age, 67 years; 52% female), the primary cause of coma was cardiac arrest in 31% and cerebral infarction or intracerebral hemorrhage in 36%. At 2 months 69% had died, 20% had survived with known severe disability, 8% were known to have survived without severe disability, and 3% survived with unknown functional status. Five clinical variables available on day 3 after enrollment were associated independently with 2-month mortality: abnormal brain stem response (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 3.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3 to 8.1), absent verbal response (OR = 4.6; 95% CI, 1.8 to 11.7), absent withdrawal response to pain (OR = 4.3; 95% CI, 1.7 to 10.8), creatinine level greater than or equal to 132.6 mumol/L (1.5 mg/dL) (OR = 4.5; 95% CI, 1.8 to 11.0), and age of 70 years or older (OR = 5.1; 95% CI, 2.2 to 12.2). Mortality at 2 months for patients with four or five of these risk factors was 97% (58/60; 95% CI, 88% to 100%) in the validation set. Brain stem and motor responses best predicted death or severe disability by 2 months. For patients with either an abnormal brain stem response or absent motor response to pain, the rate of death or severe disability at 2 months was 96% (185/193; 95% CI, 92% to 98%) in the validation set.
CONCLUSIONS: Five readily available clinical variables identify a large subgroup of patients in nontraumatic coma at high risk for poor outcomes. This risk stratification approach offers physicians, patients, and patients' families information that may prove useful in patient care decisions and resource allocation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7776500

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  12 in total

1.  Persistent vegetative state: clinical and ethical issues.

Authors:  G G Celesia
Journal:  Theor Med       Date:  1997-09

2.  Causes of coma and their evolution in the medical intensive care unit.

Authors:  Nicolas Weiss; Lucille Regard; Charles Vidal; Yosu Luque; Guillaume Taldir; Hélène Vallet; Jean-Luc Diehl; Jean-Yves Fagon; Emmanuel Guerot
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  Seeking consensus by formal methods: a health warning.

Authors:  Carol Tan; Tom Treasure; John Browne; Martin Utley; Christopher W H Davies; Harry Hemingway
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Epidemiology and prognosis of coma in daytime television dramas.

Authors:  David Casarett; Jessica M Fishman; Holly Jo MacMoran; Amy Pickard; David A Asch
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-12-24

5.  Patient-related factors associated with hospital discharge to a care facility after critical illness.

Authors:  Brian K Gehlbach; Victor R Salamanca; Joseph E Levitt; Greg A Sachs; Mary Kate Sweeney; Anne S Pohlman; Jeff Charbeneau; Jerry A Krishnan; Jesse B Hall
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.228

6.  Recognising patients who will die in the near future: a nationwide study via the Dutch Sentinel Network of GPs.

Authors:  Ebun A Abarshi; Michael A Echteld; Lieve Van den Block; Gé A Donker; Luc Deliens; Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  Early prognosis in coma after cardiac arrest: a prospective clinical, electrophysiological, and biochemical study of 60 patients.

Authors:  C Bassetti; F Bomio; J Mathis; C W Hess
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 10.154

8.  Antibiotic prophylaxis of early onset pneumonia in critically ill comatose patients. A randomized study.

Authors:  A Acquarolo; T Urli; G Perone; C Giannotti; A Candiani; N Latronico
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2005-03-08       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  Extensions to regret-based decision curve analysis: an application to hospice referral for terminal patients.

Authors:  Athanasios Tsalatsanis; Laura E Barnes; Iztok Hozo; Benjamin Djulbegovic
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 2.796

10.  Family Perceptions of Palliative Care and Communication in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  Kristina Paré; Joanna Grudziak; Kyle Lavin; May-Britt Sten; Anneka Huegerich; Karl Umble; Emma Twer; Trista Reid
Journal:  J Patient Exp       Date:  2021-07-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.