BACKGROUND: Many critically ill patients are transferred to other care facilities instead of to home at hospital discharge. OBJECTIVE: To identify patient-related factors associated with hospital discharge to a care facility after critical illness and to estimate the magnitude of risk associated with each factor. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of 548 survivors of critical illness in a medical intensive care unit. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify independent risk factors for discharge to a care facility. Only the first 72 hours of intensive care were analyzed. RESULTS: Approximately one-quarter of the survivors of critical illness were discharged to a care facility instead of to home. This event occurred more commonly in older patients, even after adjustment for severity of illness and comorbid conditions (odds ratio [OR] 1.8 for patients ≥ 65 years of age vs patients < 65 years; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-3.1; P = .02). The risk was greatest for patients who received mechanical ventilation (OR, 3.4; 95% CI, 2.0-5.8; P < .001) or had hospitalizations characterized by severe cognitive dysfunction (OR, 8.1; 95% CI, 1.3-50.6; P = .02) or poor strength and/or mobility (OR, 31.7; 95% CI, 6.4-157.3; P < .001). The model showed good discrimination (area under the curve, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.77-0.86). CONCLUSION: The model, which did not include baseline function or social variables, provided good discrimination between patients discharged to a care facility after critical illness and patients discharged to home. These results suggest that future research should focus on the debilitating effects of respiratory failure and on conditions with cognitive and neuromuscular sequelae.
BACKGROUND: Many critically illpatients are transferred to other care facilities instead of to home at hospital discharge. OBJECTIVE: To identify patient-related factors associated with hospital discharge to a care facility after critical illness and to estimate the magnitude of risk associated with each factor. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of 548 survivors of critical illness in a medical intensive care unit. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify independent risk factors for discharge to a care facility. Only the first 72 hours of intensive care were analyzed. RESULTS: Approximately one-quarter of the survivors of critical illness were discharged to a care facility instead of to home. This event occurred more commonly in older patients, even after adjustment for severity of illness and comorbid conditions (odds ratio [OR] 1.8 for patients ≥ 65 years of age vs patients < 65 years; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-3.1; P = .02). The risk was greatest for patients who received mechanical ventilation (OR, 3.4; 95% CI, 2.0-5.8; P < .001) or had hospitalizations characterized by severe cognitive dysfunction (OR, 8.1; 95% CI, 1.3-50.6; P = .02) or poor strength and/or mobility (OR, 31.7; 95% CI, 6.4-157.3; P < .001). The model showed good discrimination (area under the curve, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.77-0.86). CONCLUSION: The model, which did not include baseline function or social variables, provided good discrimination between patients discharged to a care facility after critical illness and patients discharged to home. These results suggest that future research should focus on the debilitating effects of respiratory failure and on conditions with cognitive and neuromuscular sequelae.
Authors: James C Jackson; Robert P Hart; Sharon M Gordon; Ayumi Shintani; Brenda Truman; Lisa May; E Wesley Ely Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Margaret S Herridge; Angela M Cheung; Catherine M Tansey; Andrea Matte-Martyn; Natalia Diaz-Granados; Fatma Al-Saidi; Andrew B Cooper; Cameron B Guest; C David Mazer; Sangeeta Mehta; Thomas E Stewart; Aiala Barr; Deborah Cook; Arthur S Slutsky Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-02-20 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ling Na; Sean Hennessy; Dawei Xie; Debra Saliba; Qiang Pan; Pui L Kwong; Jibby E Kurichi; Hillary R Bogner; Joel E Streim Journal: Am J Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2018-06 Impact factor: 2.159
Authors: William J Ehlenbach; Andrea Gilmore-Bykovskyi; Michael D Repplinger; Ryan P Westergaard; Elizabeth A Jacobs; Amy J H Kind; Maureen Smith Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2018-01 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Robert Hatch; Duncan Young; Vicki Barber; John Griffiths; David A Harrison; Peter Watkinson Journal: Crit Care Date: 2018-11-23 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: Takayuki Shimogai; Kazuhiro P Izawa; Minoru Kawada; Akira Kuriyama Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-11-06 Impact factor: 3.390