Literature DB >> 7776473

Comparative early and late cardiac morbidity among patients requiring different vascular surgery procedures.

G J L'Italien1, R P Cambria, B S Cutler, J A Leppo, S D Paul, D C Brewster, R C Hendel, W M Abbott, K A Eagle.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The evaluation of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients undergoing vascular surgery can provide information with respect to perioperative and long-term risk for CAD-related events. However, the extent to which the required surgical procedure itself imparts additional risk beyond that dictated by the presence of CAD determinants remains in question. The purpose of this study was to quantify the relative contributions of specific vascular procedures and CAD markers on perioperative and long-term cardiac risk.
METHODS: The study cohort comprised 547 patients undergoing vascular surgery from two medical centers who underwent clinical evaluation, dipyridamole thallium testing, and either aortic (n = 321), infrainguinal (n = 177), or carotid (n = 49) vascular surgery between 1984 and 1991. Perioperative and late cardiac risk of fatal or nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) was compared for the three procedures before and after adjustment for the influence of comorbid factors. These adjusted estimates may be regarded as the component of risk because of type of surgery.
RESULTS: Perioperative MI occurred in 6% of patients undergoing aortic and carotid artery surgery, and in 13% of patients undergoing infrainguinal procedures (p = 0.019). Significant (p < 0.05) predictors of MI were history of angina, fixed and reversible dipyridamole thallium defects, and ischemic ST depression during testing. Although patients undergoing infrainguinal procedures exhibited more than twice the risk for perioperative MI compared with patients undergoing aortic surgery (relative risk: 2.4[1.2 to 4.5, p = 0.008]), this value was reduced to insignificant levels (1.6[0.8 to 3.2, p = 0.189]) after adjustment for comorbid factors. There was little change in comparative risk between carotid artery and aortic procedures before (1.0[0.3 to 3.6, p = 0.95]) or after (0.6[0.2 to 2.3, p = 0.4]) covariate adjustment. The 4-year cumulative event-free survival rate was 90% +/- 2% for aortic, 74% +/- 5% for infrainguinal, and 78% +/- 7% for carotid artery procedures (p = 0.0001). Predictors of late MI included history of angina, congestive heart failure, diabetes, fixed dipyridamole thallium defects, and perioperative MI. Patients undergoing infrainguinal procedures exhibited a threefold greater risk for late events compared with patients undergoing aortic procedures (relative risk: 3.0[1.8 to 5.1, p = 0.005]), but this value was reduced to 1.3(0.8 to 2.3, p = 0.32) after adjustment. Long-term risk among patients undergoing carotid artery surgery was less dramatically altered by risk factor adjustment.
CONCLUSION: In current practice, among patients referred for dipyridamole testing before operation, observed differences in cardiac risk of vascular surgery procedures may be primarily attributable to readily identifiable CAD risk factors rather than to the specific type of vascular surgery. Thus the cardiac and diabetic status of patients should be given careful consideration whenever possible, regardless of surgical procedure to be performed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7776473     DOI: 10.1016/s0741-5214(95)70221-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  8 in total

Review 1.  Advances in nuclear cardiology: preoperative risk stratification.

Authors:  Kenneth A Brown
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 2.  The question: to test or not to test in preoperative cardiac risk evaluation.

Authors:  J A Leppo; S T Dahlberg
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1998 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Role of pre-operative multiple gated acquisition scanning in predicting long-term outcome in patients undergoing elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Authors:  Hashem M Barakat; Yousef Shahin; Junaid A Khan; Peter T McCollum; Ian C Chetter
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  Perioperative myocardial infarction in non-cardiac surgery. Pathophysiology and clinical implications.

Authors:  Pietro Amedeo Modesti; Ignazio Simonetti; Giuseppe Olivo
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.397

5.  Shifting paradigms in the treatment of lower extremity vascular disease: a report of 1000 percutaneous interventions.

Authors:  Brian G DeRubertis; Peter L Faries; James F McKinsey; Rabih A Chaer; Matthew Pierce; John Karwowski; Alan Weinberg; Roman Nowygrod; Nicholas J Morrissey; Harry L Bush; K Craig Kent
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Role of cardiac evaluation before thoracic endovascular aortic repair.

Authors:  Asvin M Ganapathi; Brian R Englum; Matthew A Schechter; John P Vavalle; J Kevin Harrison; Richard L McCann; G Chad Hughes
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 4.268

7.  A Risk Stratification Model for Cardiovascular Complications during the 3-Month Period after Major Elective Vascular Surgery.

Authors:  Mladjan Golubovic; Dragana Stanojevic; Milan Lazarevic; Velimir Peric; Tomislav Kostic; Miodrag Djordjevic; Sasa Zivic; Dragan J Milic
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-09-09       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Cardiac risk factors of revascularization in chronic atherosclerotic lower extremity ischemia.

Authors:  Tae-Yoon Kim; Woo-Sung Yun; Kihyuk Park
Journal:  J Korean Surg Soc       Date:  2013-02-27
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.