Literature DB >> 24973286

Role of cardiac evaluation before thoracic endovascular aortic repair.

Asvin M Ganapathi1, Brian R Englum1, Matthew A Schechter1, John P Vavalle2, J Kevin Harrison2, Richard L McCann3, G Chad Hughes4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with thoracic aortic disease undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) often have concomitant coronary artery disease and are at risk for perioperative adverse cardiac events. Despite this risk, the need for and extent of preoperative cardiac workup before TEVAR remain undefined. This study seeks to assess the adequacy of a limited cardiac evaluation before TEVAR, including assessment of cardiac symptoms, resting electrocardiography (ECG), and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), as well as to estimate the incidence of perioperative cardiac events in patients undergoing TEVAR.
METHODS: Retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained Institutional Review Board-approved database was performed for all patients undergoing TEVAR at a single referral institution between May 2002 and June 2013. The analysis identified 463 TEVAR procedures. All procedures involving median sternotomy were excluded, and 380 procedures (343 patients) were included in the final analysis. Degree of cardiac workup was classified on the basis of the highest level of preoperative testing: no workup, resting ECG only, resting TTE, exercise/pharmacologic stress testing, or coronary angiography. Standard workup consisted of cardiac symptom assessment along with resting ECG or TTE, with further workup indicated for unstable symptoms, significantly abnormal findings on ECG or TTE, or multiple cardiac risk factors. Categorical and continuous variables were compared by Fisher's exact test and analysis of variance, respectively.
RESULTS: No preoperative cardiac workup was performed for 28 patients (7.4%); 127 patients (33.4%) had resting ECG only, 208 patients (54.7%) had resting echocardiography, 12 patients (3.2%) underwent stress testing, and five patients (1.3%) had coronary angiography. Patients undergoing stress testing or coronary angiography were older and had a higher incidence of known coronary artery disease (P < .01) and prior myocardial infarction (P = .01). Complex hybrid aortic repairs and TEVAR for aneurysmal disease were more likely to have an extensive workup, whereas nonelective procedures more commonly had no workup. A total of nine patients (2.4%) experienced a perioperative cardiac event (myocardial infarction or cardiac arrest), with no significant difference noted among all groups (P = .45), suggesting that the extent of cardiac workup was appropriate. The incidence of 30-day/in-hospital mortality (5.5%) and cardiac-specific mortality (0.8%) was similar among all groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The risk of a postoperative cardiac event after TEVAR is low (2.4%), and initial screening with either resting TTE or ECG, in addition to assessment of cardiac symptom status, appears adequate for most TEVAR patients. As such, we recommend resting TTE or ECG as the initial cardiovascular screening mechanism in patients undergoing TEVAR, with subsequent more invasive studies if initial screening reveals cardiovascular abnormalities.
Copyright © 2014 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24973286      PMCID: PMC4336174          DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.05.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  28 in total

1.  2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with Thoracic Aortic Disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American College of Radiology, American Stroke Association, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, and Society for Vascular Medicine.

Authors:  Loren F Hiratzka; George L Bakris; Joshua A Beckman; Robert M Bersin; Vincent F Carr; Donald E Casey; Kim A Eagle; Luke K Hermann; Eric M Isselbacher; Ella A Kazerooni; Nicholas T Kouchoukos; Bruce W Lytle; Dianna M Milewicz; David L Reich; Souvik Sen; Julie A Shinn; Lars G Svensson; David M Williams
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Perioperative cardiac events in endovascular repair of complex aortic aneurysms and association with preoperative studies.

Authors:  Guilherme L Bub; Roy K Greenberg; Tara M Mastracci; Matthew J Eagleton; Giuseppe Panuccio; Adrian V Hernandez; Manuel D Cerqueira
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.268

3.  A clinical randomized trial to evaluate the safety of a noninvasive approach in high-risk patients undergoing major vascular surgery: the DECREASE-V Pilot Study.

Authors:  Don Poldermans; Olaf Schouten; Radosav Vidakovic; Jeroen J Bax; Ian R Thomson; Sanne E Hoeks; Harm H H Feringa; Martin Dunkelgrün; Peter de Jaegere; Alexander Maat; Marc R H M van Sambeek; Miklos D Kertai; Eric Boersma
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2007-04-16       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Preoperative cardiac assessment in patients undergoing aortic surgery: analysis of factors affecting the cardiac outcomes.

Authors:  Nicola Troisi; Walter Dorigo; Patrizia Lo Sapio; Giovanni Pratesi; Raffaele Pulli; Gian Franco Gensini; Carlo Pratesi
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  2010-05-15       Impact factor: 1.466

5.  Risk factors for late mortality after endovascular repair of the thoracic aorta.

Authors:  Jayer Chung; Matthew A Corriere; Ravi K Veeraswamy; Karthikeshwar Kasirajan; Ross Milner; Thomas F Dodson; Atef A Salam; Elliot L Chaikof
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 4.268

6.  The Vascular Study Group of New England Cardiac Risk Index (VSG-CRI) predicts cardiac complications more accurately than the Revised Cardiac Risk Index in vascular surgery patients.

Authors:  Daniel J Bertges; Philip P Goodney; Yuanyuan Zhao; Andres Schanzer; Brian W Nolan; Donald S Likosky; Jens Eldrup-Jorgensen; Jack L Cronenwett
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 7.  New developments in the preoperative evaluation and perioperative management of coronary artery disease in patients undergoing vascular surgery.

Authors:  Stephen M Bauer; Neal S Cayne; Frank J Veith
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 8.  What does 'best medical therapy' really mean?

Authors:  H Sillesen
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 7.069

9.  Effects of extended-release metoprolol succinate in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery (POISE trial): a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  P J Devereaux; Homer Yang; Salim Yusuf; Gordon Guyatt; Kate Leslie; Juan Carlos Villar; Denis Xavier; Susan Chrolavicius; Launi Greenspan; Janice Pogue; Prem Pais; Lisheng Liu; Shouchun Xu; German Málaga; Alvaro Avezum; Matthew Chan; Victor M Montori; Mike Jacka; Peter Choi
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2008-05-12       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Prediction of major adverse cardiac events in vascular surgery: are cardiac risk scores of any practical value?

Authors:  Chetan D Parmar; Francesco Torella
Journal:  Vasc Endovascular Surg       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 1.089

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Current state of hybrid solutions for aortic arch aneurysms.

Authors:  G Chad Hughes; Andrew Vekstein
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-11

2.  Predictors and Outcomes of Cardiac Events following Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair in Descending Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm and Dissection.

Authors:  Derrick O Acheampong; Philip Paul; Percy Boateng; I Michael Leitman
Journal:  Aorta (Stamford)       Date:  2020-06-29
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.