Literature DB >> 7775908

Periodic health evaluation of adults: a survey of family physicians.

R Luckmann1, S K Melville.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The routine periodic health evaluation (PHE) is a popular format in primary care practice for the delivery of clinical preventive services to adults, but knowledge of the current pattern of use and of the content of the PHE is limited.
METHODS: We surveyed a random sample of 567 family physicians (response rate, 60.1%) in New England regarding their approach to and attitudes about the PHE of adults.
RESULTS: Family physicians reported spending a mean of 35.2% (11.6 hours per week) of their total ambulatory care time on adult PHEs, which were usually scheduled for 20 to 30 minutes each. All respondents recommended a PHE to men > or = 50 years old and to women > or = 40 years old, and more than 90% recommended a PHE to younger patients. Most physicians (80.7%) reported that the PHE is their primary mechanism for delivering preventive services, and 90.6% believed that the PHE should include a comprehensive physical examination. The mean number of physical examination items performed during the PHE was 11.6 to 13.9, depending on patient age and sex. As part of the PHE, most physicians (71.6% to 90.7%, depending on patient age and sex) ordered one or more screening laboratory tests not recommended by the US Preventive Services Task Force. Utilization of fewer laboratory tests was associated with residency training, employment in a health maintenance organization (HMO), and limited concern about malpractice suits.
CONCLUSIONS: Family physicians reported spending a substantial amount of time on the PHE of adults, performing extensive screening physical examinations and many screening laboratory tests of unknown effectiveness. Among family physicians, there is considerable unexplained variation in the form and content of the PHE.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7775908

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fam Pract        ISSN: 0094-3509            Impact factor:   0.493


  9 in total

Review 1.  [Check-up-examinations in internal medicine].

Authors:  S Hunziker; P Hengstler; L Zimmerli; M Battegay; E Battegay
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 0.743

2.  Screening for diabetes in an outpatient clinic population.

Authors:  David Edelman; Lloyd J Edwards; Maren K Olsen; Tara K Dudley; Amy C Harris; Dana K Blackwell; Eugene Z Oddone
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Automating the recognition and prioritization of needed preventive services: early results from the CHICA system.

Authors:  Paul Gene Biondich; Stephen M Downs; Vibha Anand; Aaron E Carroll
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2005

4.  Preventive screening. What factors influence testing?

Authors:  Murray M Finkelstein
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.275

5.  How physicians approach prostate cancer screening before and after losing a lawsuit.

Authors:  Alex H Krist; Steven H Woolf; Robert E Johnson
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

6.  Preventive care for the elderly. Do family physicians comply with recommendations of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care?

Authors:  A Freedman; N Pimlott; G Naglie
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.275

7.  Prevention services in primary care: taking time, setting priorities.

Authors:  M Rafferty
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1998-11

8.  Initiation of health behavior discussions during primary care outpatient visits.

Authors:  Susan A Flocke; Robert Kelly; Janelle Highland
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2008-11-14

9.  Perspective of healthy asymptomatic patients requesting general blood tests from their physicians: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Michal Shaked; Inbar Levkovich; Tamar Adar; Alma Peri; Nir Liviatan
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 2.497

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.