Literature DB >> 7772390

Patients who do not receive continuity of care from their general practitioner--are they a vulnerable group?

K G Sweeney1, D P Gray.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Continuity of care is much valued by general practitioners but little is known about those patients who do not receive continuity of care. AIM: This study set out to identify and describe a group of patients who did not receive continuity of care from the general practitioner with whom they were personally registered.
METHOD: A total of 110 patients (71 female and 39 male) were identified, who did not receive continuity of care, defined as four consecutive face to face consultations which did not take place with the doctor with whom they were registered. This group was compared with an age and sex matched control group who did receive continuity of care, using general practice records, for demographic characteristics, morbidity, relationship problems, number of 'difficult' consultations, failure to attend appointments, and use of an accident and emergency department and of open access clinics.
RESULTS: Patients in the study group were more likely to be under the age of 65 years than all patients on the doctor's list. Study patients were more likely than control patients to be in social class 4 or 5 living in a council house. Patients in the study group were more likely than controls to be depressed. Women patients in the study group were more likely to suffer from vaginal discharge. Men patients in the study group were more likely to complain of non-cardiac chest pain. The study group had more marital problems, parent-child relationship problems, and problems involving violence in the family, as well as other relationship problems. Relationship problems included the relationship with the doctor, since a third of all the consultations in the study group were recorded as 'difficult', compared with 3% in the control group. The study group patients were more likely than controls not to attend appointments which they had made, to use the accident and emergency department repeatedly, and to have used other open access clinics.
CONCLUSION: Lack of continuity of care is associated with some additional morbidity, an increased number of relationship problems, 'difficult' consultations, and non-attendances, and an increase in the use of open access clinics. The characteristics of this group of patients represent a syndrome which merits further study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7772390      PMCID: PMC1239173     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  13 in total

1.  Seeing the same doctor.

Authors:  M J Aylett
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1976-01

2.  The inverse care law.

Authors:  J T Hart
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1971-02-27       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  The key to personal care.

Authors:  D J Gray
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1979-11

4.  A difficult case. Does it help to know your patient?

Authors:  A F Wright
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1983-11-19

5.  Continuous confusion?

Authors:  B Starfield
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  How much personal care in four group practices?

Authors:  G K Freeman; S C Richards
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-11-03

7.  Continuity of care in general practice: effect on patient satisfaction.

Authors:  P Hjortdahl; E Laerum
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-05-16

8.  Is personal continuity of care compatible with free choice of doctor? Patients' views on seeing the same doctor.

Authors:  G K Freeman; S C Richards
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  General practice compliance study: is it worth being a personal doctor?

Authors:  P R Ettlinger; G K Freeman
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1981-04-11

Review 10.  Continuity of care and family medicine: definition, determinants, and relationship to outcome.

Authors:  E M Wall
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 0.493

View more
  30 in total

1.  Relationship between continuity of care and diabetes control: evidence from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Authors:  Arch G Mainous; Richelle J Koopman; James M Gill; Richard Baker; William S Pearson
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Continuity of care and quality of care - inseparable twin.

Authors:  Mohammed Al-Azri
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2008-07

Review 3.  Interpersonal continuity of care and care outcomes: a critical review.

Authors:  John W Saultz; Jennifer Lochner
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2005 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

4.  A method for measuring continuity of care in day-to-day general practice: a quantitative analysis of appointment data.

Authors:  Kate Sidaway-Lee; Denis Pereira Gray; Philip Evans
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 5.  Continuity of care for older patients in family practice: how important is it?

Authors:  Graham Worrall; John Knight
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  Tackling multimorbidity in primary care: is relational continuity the missing ingredient?

Authors:  Serge A Engamba; Nicholas Steel; Amanda Howe; Max Bachman
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  Income and regional gradients in being without a regular doctor: does the slope of gradients decrease for those with greater health needs?

Authors:  Ardeshir Sepehri
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2014-05

8.  Continuity of Care: Literature review and implications.

Authors:  Mohammed Alazri; Philip Heywood; Richard D Neal; Brenda Leese
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2007-12

9.  Continuity of GP care is related to reduced specialist healthcare use: a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Anne Helen Hansen; Peder A Halvorsen; Ivar J Aaraas; Olav Helge Førde
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 5.386

10.  Continuity of primary care and emergency department utilization among elderly people.

Authors:  Raluca Ionescu-Ittu; Jane McCusker; Antonio Ciampi; Alain-Michel Vadeboncoeur; Danièle Roberge; Danielle Larouche; Josée Verdon; Raynald Pineault
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 8.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.