Literature DB >> 7772095

Limb-sequencing deficits after left but not right hemisphere damage.

K Y Haaland1, D L Harrington.   

Abstract

The performance of right and left hemisphere stroke patients was compared to normal control groups on a task where subjects alternately hit two targets which varied in size from 0.5 to 6.5 cm. The stroke patients used the arm ipsilateral to damage, and the control groups used the same arm as their respective stroke group. Lesion size and location were similar for the two stroke groups. No deficits were found for the right hemisphere stroke group. The left stroke group's tapping speed was not slower at the smallest target, but became progressively slower relative to the control group's as target size increased. Variability in tapping speed increased as target size increased for all except the left stroke group. While the entire left stroke group was as accurate as their controls, the apraxic, but not nonapraxic, patients made more errors on smaller targets only. Two explanations for these findings both emphasize the left hemisphere's special role in motor programming; one focuses upon its dominance for movements which are independent of sensory feedback and the other emphasizes its specialization for processing rapid temporal information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7772095     DOI: 10.1006/brcg.1994.1006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Cogn        ISSN: 0278-2626            Impact factor:   2.310


  26 in total

1.  Hemispheric specialization in the co-ordination of arm and trunk movements during pointing in patients with unilateral brain damage.

Authors:  Danilo Y Esparza; Philippe S Archambault; Carolee J Winstein; Mindy F Levin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-12-21       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The importance of the dominant hemisphere in the organization of bimanual movements.

Authors:  Deborah J Serrien; Michael J Cassidy; Peter Brown
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Interlimb differences in control of movement extent.

Authors:  Robert L Sainburg; Sydney Y Schaefer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-04-28       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Temporal dynamics of ipsilateral and contralateral motor activity during voluntary finger movement.

Authors:  Ming-Xiong Huang; Deborah L Harrington; Kim M Paulson; Michael P Weisend; Roland R Lee
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Cortico-cortical coupling patterns during dual task performance.

Authors:  Deborah J Serrien; Alek H Pogosyan; Peter Brown
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-02-17       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Asymmetry of interhemispheric interaction in left-handed subjects.

Authors:  Bettina Pollok; Joachim Gross; Alfons Schnitzler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-08-04       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Task-dependent asymmetries in the utilization of proprioceptive feedback for goal-directed movement.

Authors:  Daniel J Goble; Susan H Brown
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-02-13       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Exploration of computational methods for classification of movement intention during human voluntary movement from single trial EEG.

Authors:  Ou Bai; Peter Lin; Sherry Vorbach; Jiang Li; Steve Furlani; Mark Hallett
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-10-29       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 9.  Evidence for a distributed hierarchy of action representation in the brain.

Authors:  Scott T Grafton; Antonia F de C Hamilton
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2007-08-13       Impact factor: 2.161

10.  Functional activation in motor cortex reflects the direction and the degree of handedness.

Authors:  P Dassonville; X H Zhu; K Uurbil; S G Kim; J Ashe
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-12-09       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.