Literature DB >> 7770995

[Can the results of cruciate ligament operations be arthrometrically evaluated? A comparison of subjective assessment, Lysholm score, clinical stability classification and measuring stability with the KT 1000 after complex knee injuries].

F Bonnaire1, H Berwarth, P Münst, S Eichinger, E H Kuner.   

Abstract

In a long-term follow-up of 88 patients with complex ligament knee injuries we examined 70 of these who were operated upon between 1.4. 1988 and 31.3. 1990. We specifically looked at local complications, clinical results and knee stability, using subjective and arthrometrical (KT-1000) results 1 or 2 years after operation. The only parameters with a good correlation with stability were the clinical examination (Lachman-test) and the results with the arthrometer in the anterior-posterior translation. Stability after ACL-reconstruction with augmentation with a polydiaxonaon (PDS) augmentation band was physiological (2 mm under 89 N anterior-posterior traction) in 77% of all knees but only in 57% under maximal anterior-posterior manual stress. Neither the subjective outcome of Lysholm-Score correlated with arthrometry and clinical examination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7770995     DOI: 10.1007/bf02588735

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Unfallchirurgie        ISSN: 0340-2649


  12 in total

1.  ["Scoring"--benefits and pitfalls].

Authors:  R Inglis; J Windolf; A Pannike
Journal:  Unfallchirurgie       Date:  1991-04

2.  Anterior knee motion analysis. Measurement and simultaneous radiography.

Authors:  H U Stäubli; R P Jakob
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1991 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Repeatability of the KT-1000 arthrometer in a normal population.

Authors:  R R Wroble; L A Van Ginkel; E S Grood; F R Noyes; B L Shaffer
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1990 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Is the KT1000 knee ligament arthrometer reliable?

Authors:  I W Forster; C D Warren-Smith; M Tew
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1989-11

5.  OAK knee evaluation. A new way to assess knee ligament injuries.

Authors:  W Müller; R Biedert; F Hefti; R P Jakob; U Munzinger; H U Stäubli
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on use of a scoring scale.

Authors:  J Lysholm; J Gillquist
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1982 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Instrumented measurement of anterior laxity of the knee.

Authors:  D M Daniel; L L Malcom; G Losse; M L Stone; R Sachs; R Burks
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries.

Authors:  Y Tegner; J Lysholm
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Instrumented measurement of anterior knee laxity in patients with acute anterior cruciate ligament disruption.

Authors:  D M Daniel; M L Stone; R Sachs; L Malcom
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1985 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Knee ligament injuries: a standardized evaluation method.

Authors:  J L Marshall; J F Fetto; P M Botero
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1977 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  1 in total

1.  Augmentation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction-a histological and biomechanical study on goats.

Authors:  P Buma; H J Kok; L Blankevoort; W Kuijpers; R Huiskes; A Van Kampen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2003-11-11       Impact factor: 3.075

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.