Literature DB >> 7770602

Prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle reflex using visual and auditory prepulses: disruption by apomorphine.

S Campeau1, M Davis.   

Abstract

The amplitude of the acoustic startle reflex can be reduced reliably when preceded at short intervals by a weak stimulus (prepulse) which itself does not elicit startle. The magnitude of this prepulse inhibition effect is attenuated by several dopamine agonists, such as apomorphine, especially when there is a relatively small difference between the intensity of the prepulse and the intensity of the background noise over which the prepulse is superimposed. One goal of the present experiment was to test the generality of this disruptive effect of apomorphine on prepulse inhibition by using either an auditory prepulse that included both a change in intensity and a change in frequency relative to the background noise or a visual prepulse stimulus. Apomorphine reduced auditory prepulse inhibition when induced by a small change in stimulus intensity, but not when induced by a change in both intensity and frequency. Apomorphine consistently reduced visual prepulse inhibition with a complete blockade at 100-ms test interval. However, it did not fully block the usual reduction in startle onset latency or even attenuate the increase in startle amplitude when a visual prepulse was presented 5, 10 or 15 ms before the startle stimulus. Consistent with conclusions from other laboratories using auditory prepulse inhibition, these data suggest that apomorphine did not prevent the animal from detecting prepulse presentation under conditions where the drug completely blocked prepulse inhibition. Moreover, they indicate that the blockade of prepulse inhibition by apomorphine was independent of prepulse modality, adding generality to the original finding. Visual prepulse inhibition may be a useful alternative procedure for evaluating the effects of drugs on this attentional process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7770602     DOI: 10.1007/bf02246101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  30 in total

1.  The neural substrates of sensorimotor gating of the startle reflex: a review of recent findings and their implications.

Authors:  N R Swerdlow; S B Caine; D L Braff; M A Geyer
Journal:  J Psychopharmacol       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 4.153

2.  Effects of subchronic d-amphetamine on prepulse and gap inhibition of the acoustic startle reflex in rats.

Authors:  T H Hijzen; L M Broersen; J L Slangen
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  1991-06-01       Impact factor: 13.382

3.  Role of weak signals in acoustic startle.

Authors:  H S Hoffman; B L Wible
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1970-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Apomorphine disrupts the inhibition of acoustic startle induced by weak prepulses in rats.

Authors:  M Davis; R S Mansbach; N R Swerdlow; S Campeau; D L Braff; M A Geyer
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Reflex modification in the domain of startle: I. Some empirical findings and their implications for how the nervous system processes sensory input.

Authors:  H S Hoffman; J R Ison
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Attentional factors in the inhibition of a reflex by a visual stimulus.

Authors:  E M DelPezzo; H S Hoffman
Journal:  Science       Date:  1980-11-07       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Modification of the rat's acoustic startle response by antecedent visual stimulation.

Authors:  G M Schwartz; H S Hoffman; C L Stitt; R R Marsh
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1976-01

8.  A D2 dopamine receptor agonist disrupts sensorimotor gating in rats. Implications for dopaminergic abnormalities in schizophrenia.

Authors:  R Y Peng; R S Mansbach; D L Braff; M A Geyer
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 7.853

9.  Dopaminergic stimulation disrupts sensorimotor gating in the rat.

Authors:  R S Mansbach; M A Geyer; D L Braff
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Spectral frequency and the modulation of the acoustic startle reflex by background noise.

Authors:  R L Gerrard; J R Ison
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1990-01
View more
  8 in total

1.  Temporal processsing demands in the HIV-1 transgenic rat: Amodal gating and implications for diagnostics.

Authors:  Kristen A McLaurin; Rosemarie M Booze; Charles F Mactutus
Journal:  Int J Dev Neurosci       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 2.457

2.  Activation of nociceptin/orphanin FQ peptide receptors disrupts visual but not auditory sensorimotor gating in BALB/cByJ mice: comparison to dopamine receptor agonists.

Authors:  Aurelia Ces; David Reiss; Ondine Walter; Jürgen Wichmann; Eric P Prinssen; Brigitte L Kieffer; Abdel-Mouttalib Ouagazzal
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 7.853

3.  Effects of single and repeated exposure to apomorphine on the acoustic startle reflex and its inhibition by a visual prepulse.

Authors:  M K Taylor; J R Ison; S B Schwarzkopf
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 4.  Human and animal studies of schizophrenia-related gating deficits.

Authors:  G A Light; D L Braff
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.285

5.  Diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for HAND.

Authors:  Kristen A McLaurin; Rosemarie M Booze; Charles F Mactutus
Journal:  J Neurovirol       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 2.643

6.  Rat strain differences in startle gating-disruptive effects of apomorphine occur with both acoustic and visual prepulses.

Authors:  M Weber; N R Swerdlow
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2007-09-07       Impact factor: 3.533

7.  GABA neurons in the ventral tegmental area responding to peripheral sensory input.

Authors:  Chang-Liang Liu; Ming Gao; Guo-Zhang Jin; Xuechu Zhen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-10       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Comprehensive analysis of a novel mouse model of the 22q11.2 deletion syndrome: a model with the most common 3.0-Mb deletion at the human 22q11.2 locus.

Authors:  Ryo Saito; Michinori Koebis; Taku Nagai; Kimiko Shimizu; Jingzhu Liao; Bolati Wulaer; Yuki Sugaya; Kenichiro Nagahama; Naofumi Uesaka; Itaru Kushima; Daisuke Mori; Kazuaki Maruyama; Kazuki Nakao; Hiroki Kurihara; Kiyofumi Yamada; Masanobu Kano; Yoshitaka Fukada; Norio Ozaki; Atsu Aiba
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 6.222

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.