Literature DB >> 7480542

Effects of single and repeated exposure to apomorphine on the acoustic startle reflex and its inhibition by a visual prepulse.

M K Taylor1, J R Ison, S B Schwarzkopf.   

Abstract

The acoustic startle reflex (ASR) is inhibited by startle-irrelevant stimuli that briefly precede reflex elicitation. This effect, prepulse inhibition (PPI), is reduced in strength for animals that have received dopamine agonists, such as apomorphine (APO). Reduction in PPI is most evident for weak masked noise prepulses, thus suggesting that APO disrupts the reception of stimuli to the extent that they present a low signal-to-noise ratio. Here we examine the effect of APO on PPI produced by non-masked visual prepulses. Light flashes were given at two intensities, 40, 70, 110, or 220 ms before ASR elicitation. In phase 1 (5 weeks in duration) half of the animals received one weekly injection of APO (0.5 mg/kg, IP) and one of vehicle (VEH), while the other half received two injections of VEH. Within these groups, half were tested 30 min after the injections, the other half kept test naive (four groups total). In phase 2, following a 4-week rest, all groups were tested after a low dose of APO (0.1 mg/kg) and VEH, 1 week apart. APO eliminated PPI for a dim flash and reduced PPI for a brighter flash to a level normally obtained with the dim flash, while increasing both ASR control values and activity. The bright light was maximally effective at a lead time of 70 ms and APO did not alter this value. Because in general the time of maximal inhibition varies with prepulse intensity for visual stimuli, the finding that the time of the peak remained constant reveals that APO has its effect on inhibition rather than on effective stimulus intensity. In phase 2, APO reduced PPI with no sign of sensitization from past drug exposure. However, APO increased the ASR only in groups previously exposed to APO, indicating behavioral sensitization. The differential effects of repeated exposure on these response measures suggest that neural substrates for the several behavioral effects of APO function at least in part independently.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7480542     DOI: 10.1007/bf02246183

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  39 in total

1.  Presidential Address, 1974. The more or less startling effects of weak prestimulation.

Authors:  F K Graham
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1975-05       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Effects of subchronic d-amphetamine on prepulse and gap inhibition of the acoustic startle reflex in rats.

Authors:  T H Hijzen; L M Broersen; J L Slangen
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  1991-06-01       Impact factor: 13.382

3.  The acoustic startle response and disruption of aiming: II. Modulation by forewarning and preliminary stimuli.

Authors:  J A Foss; J R Ison; J P Torre; S Wansack
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 2.888

4.  Latent sensitization to apomorphine following repeated low doses.

Authors:  B A Mattingly; J E Gotsick; K Salamanca
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 1.912

5.  Apomorphine disrupts the inhibition of acoustic startle induced by weak prepulses in rats.

Authors:  M Davis; R S Mansbach; N R Swerdlow; S Campeau; D L Braff; M A Geyer
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Reflex modification in the domain of startle: I. Some empirical findings and their implications for how the nervous system processes sensory input.

Authors:  H S Hoffman; J R Ison
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Time course of transient behavioral depression and persistent behavioral sensitization in relation to regional brain monoamine concentrations during amphetamine withdrawal in rats.

Authors:  P E Paulson; D M Camp; T E Robinson
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Gating and habituation of the startle reflex in schizophrenic patients.

Authors:  D L Braff; C Grillon; M A Geyer
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1992-03

9.  Effects of haloperidol and SCH 23390 on acoustic startle and prepulse inhibition under basal and stimulated conditions.

Authors:  S B Schwarzkopf; J P Bruno; T Mitra
Journal:  Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 5.067

10.  Impoverished stimulus input does not simulate the slowed visual kinetics of retinal damage.

Authors:  J R Ison; G P Bowen; M del Cerro
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 4.799

View more
  3 in total

1.  Activation of nociceptin/orphanin FQ peptide receptors disrupts visual but not auditory sensorimotor gating in BALB/cByJ mice: comparison to dopamine receptor agonists.

Authors:  Aurelia Ces; David Reiss; Ondine Walter; Jürgen Wichmann; Eric P Prinssen; Brigitte L Kieffer; Abdel-Mouttalib Ouagazzal
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 7.853

2.  Prepulse inhibition during withdrawal from an escalating dosage schedule of amphetamine.

Authors:  Holger Russig; Carol A Murphy; Joram Feldon
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2002-11-12       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Rat strain differences in startle gating-disruptive effects of apomorphine occur with both acoustic and visual prepulses.

Authors:  M Weber; N R Swerdlow
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2007-09-07       Impact factor: 3.533

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.