Literature DB >> 7769250

In situ hybridization for cytokine mRNA with digoxigenin-labeled riboprobes. Sensitivity of detection and double label applications.

L J Karr1, A Panoskaltsis-Mortari, J Li, D Devore-Carter, C T Weaver, R P Bucy.   

Abstract

A sensitive in situ hybridization procedure using both digoxigenin and 35S-labeled riboprobes is described that allows detection of single T cells expressing cytokine mRNA species in both single and double label formats. Modifications to existing procedures have been developed that allow in situ hybridization to be performed in either fresh frozen tissue sections or cytocentrifuge preparations of cultured cells. For single label studies, the digoxigenin labeling technique is equivalent to 35S labeling for sensitivity of detection and is superior with respect to precise localization and ease of use. A procedure to detect two cytokine mRNA species in individual cells can be performed using one digoxigenin-labeled riboprobe and one 35S-riboprobe, with equivalent sensitivity between the two labels and no non-specific mixing of the two signals. Since production of many T cell cytokines are controlled by transcriptional mechanisms, the use of in situ hybridization will be useful to investigate the biology of T cell activation, patterns of cytokine phenotype development, and histological localization of cytokine expressing cells in inflammatory lesions. Initial studies using this method to examine cytokine expression by a panel of T cell clones reveals that individual cytokine genes are not necessarily expressed in coordination in individual cells and relatively few individual cells in a Th0 clone express Th1-like and Th2-like cytokines simultaneously.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7769250     DOI: 10.1016/0022-1759(95)00027-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Immunol Methods        ISSN: 0022-1759            Impact factor:   2.303


  6 in total

1.  Alkaline fixation drastically improves the signal of in situ hybridization.

Authors:  E Basyuk; E Bertrand; L Journot
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-05-15       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Effects of Porphyromonas gingivalis and Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharides on mononuclear phagocytes.

Authors:  F A Roberts; G J Richardson; S M Michalek
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.441

Review 3.  Heterogeneity in the clonal T cell response. Implications for models of T cell activation and cytokine phenotype development.

Authors:  C T Weaver; A Saparov; L A Kraus; W O Rogers; R D Hockett; R P Bucy
Journal:  Immunol Res       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.829

4.  Single cell analysis of cytokine gene coexpression during CD4+ T-cell phenotype development.

Authors:  R P Bucy; L Karr; G Q Huang; J Li; D Carter; K Honjo; J A Lemons; K M Murphy; C T Weaver
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1995-08-01       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Constant mean viral copy number per infected cell in tissues regardless of high, low, or undetectable plasma HIV RNA.

Authors:  R D Hockett; J M Kilby; C A Derdeyn; M S Saag; M Sillers; K Squires; S Chiz; M A Nowak; G M Shaw; R P Bucy
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  1999-05-17       Impact factor: 14.307

6.  In situ hybridization to detect and localize signature cytokines of T-helper (Th) 1 and Th2 immune responses in chicken tissues.

Authors:  Fana Alem Kidane; Ivana Bilic; Taniya Mitra; Patricia Wernsdorf; Michael Hess; Dieter Liebhart
Journal:  Vet Immunol Immunopathol       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 2.046

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.