Literature DB >> 7766340

The combined oral contraceptive. Risks and adverse effects in perspective.

S Bagshaw1.   

Abstract

The risks and adverse effects of the low dose, new generation progestogen combined oral contraceptives (COCs) are much lower than original studies involving pills containing 50 micrograms estrogen. The main effects are those on the cardiovascular system, lipid and glucose metabolism and cancer. Any effect of the COC on myocardial infarction is probably minimal if the woman has no other risk factors especially smoking. The third generation progestogen, low dose COCs have very little effect on lipid or glucose metabolism. There may be a slight increase in breast cancer if COCs are used under the age of 25 years and for more than 4 to 8 years, and in the risk of cervical cancer. It is too early to estimate long term cancer effects of the newer COCs. Adverse effects such as nausea and breast tenderness can be managed by changing the estrogen dose or the type of progestogen. Overall, the clinical benefits of the COC probably outweight the risks and adverse effects.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biology; Breast Cancer; Cancer; Cardiovascular Effects; Cervical Cancer; Contraception; Contraceptive Methods--side effects; Critique; Demographic Factors; Diseases; Embolism; Evaluation; Family Planning; Fertility; Hypertension; Liver Neoplasms; Metabolic Effects; Neoplasms; Oral Contraceptives, Combined--side effects; Oral Contraceptives, Low-dose; Oral Contraceptives--side effects; Physiology; Population; Population Dynamics; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Thromboembolism; Vascular Diseases

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7766340     DOI: 10.2165/00002018-199512020-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Saf        ISSN: 0114-5916            Impact factor:   5.606


  9 in total

1.  Oral contraceptive use and breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis of variations with age at diagnosis, parity and total duration of oral contraceptive use.

Authors:  L Rushton; D R Jones
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1992-03

Review 2.  Clinical and metabolic considerations of long-term oral contraceptive use.

Authors:  I F Godsland; D Crook; V Wynn
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Is oral contraceptive use still associated with an increased risk of fatal myocardial infarction? Report of a case-control study.

Authors:  M Thorogood; J Mann; M Murphy; M Vessey
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1991-12

Review 4.  Hormonal contraception.

Authors:  D T Baird; A F Glasier
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-05-27       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Incidence of arterial disease among oral contraceptive users. Royal College of General Practitioners' Oral Contraception Study.

Authors: 
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1983-02

Review 6.  The safety of oral contraceptives: epidemiologic insights from the first 30 years.

Authors:  D A Grimes
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Oral contraception and risk of a cerebral thromboembolic attack: results of a case-control study.

Authors:  O Lidegaard
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-04-10

8.  Conception delay after oral contraceptive use: the effect of estrogen dose.

Authors:  M B Bracken; K G Hellenbrand; T R Holford
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Oral contraceptives and thromboembolic disease: effects of lowering oestrogen content.

Authors:  L E Böttiger; G Boman; G Eklund; B Westerholm
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1980-05-24       Impact factor: 79.321

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  User satisfaction with the combined oral contraceptive drospirenone 3 mg/ethinylestradiol 20 microg (Yasminelle) in clinical practice: a multi-country, questionnaire-based study.

Authors:  Mary Short
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.859

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.