Literature DB >> 7760410

Contributing factors influencing type III open tibial fractures.

K Yokoyama1, M Itoman, M Shindo, H Kai.   

Abstract

Ninety-five patients with severe open tibial fractures (96 fractures) were treated with nonoperative treatment alone (NO group, n = 16), immediate internal fixation (I group, n = 22), delayed internal fixation (D group, n = 34), or external fixation (EF group, n = 24). The D group was divided into a delayed internal fixation group following nonoperative treatment (D1 group, n = 14), and a delayed internal fixation group following external fixation (D2 group, n = 20). Using the classification system of Gustilo, there were 43 type IIIA, 42 type IIIB, and 11 type IIIC open tibial fractures. There were 17 deep infections (type IIIA, n = 3; IIIB, n = 12; IIIC, n = 2). The difference in the deep infection rate (DIR) between the type IIIA and type IIIB fractures was statistically significant (7.0% vs. 28.0%, p < 0.05). The DIRs in groups NO, I, D1, D2, and EF were 12.5, 27.3, 7.1, 35, and 4%, respectively. There was a significant difference in DIR between the D2 group and the EF group. The DIR in the D (D1 + D2) group and group I showed no significant difference. There was no relationship between the DIR and either Injury Severity Score or skin closure time. The authors of this study, therefore, do not feel there is an advantage to immediate internal fixation over delayed procedures for Gustilo type III open fractures of the tibia. However, careful attention must be given to the application of delayed internal fixation, especially intramedullary nailing, after external fixation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7760410     DOI: 10.1097/00005373-199505000-00019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  6 in total

1.  Impact of negative pressure wound therapy on open diaphyseal tibial fractures: A prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Siddharth R Virani; Aditya A Dahapute; S S Bava; Saurabh R Muni
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2016-07-16

2.  What is the rate of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Gram-negative infections in open fractures?

Authors:  Antonia F Chen; Verena M Schreiber; Wesley Washington; Nalini Rao; Andrew R Evans
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Timing issue in open fractures debridement: a review article.

Authors:  Alberto Jorge-Mora; Juan Rodriguez-Martin; Juan Pretell-Mazzini
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2012-04-04

Review 4.  Risk factors for infectious complications after open fractures; a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kirsten Kortram; Hans Bezstarosti; Willem-Jan Metsemakers; Michael J Raschke; Esther M M Van Lieshout; Michael H J Verhofstad
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Negative pressure wound therapy for Gustilo Anderson grade IIIb open tibial fractures.

Authors:  Chul Hyun Park; Oog Jin Shon; Gi Beom Kim
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.251

6.  Incidence of infection after early intramedullary nailing of open tibial shaft fractures stabilized with pinless external fixators.

Authors:  Vikas Kulshrestha
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.251

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.