Literature DB >> 7760110

Microstimulation of extrastriate area MST influences performance on a direction discrimination task.

S Celebrini1, W T Newsome.   

Abstract

1. Evidence from single-unit recordings suggests that neurons in the medial superior temporal visual area (MST) carry directional signals that influence psychophysical judgements of motion direction. We tested this hypothesis by electrically stimulating clusters of directionally selective neurons in MST (the dorsomedial subdivision, primarily) while rhesus monkeys performed a two-alternative, forced-choice direction discrimination task. 2. We performed forty-six microstimulation experiments on two rhesus monkeys. The visual stimuli were dynamic random dot patterns in which the strength of a coherent motion signal could be varied continuously about psychophysical threshold. The monkeys were rewarded for reporting correctly the direction of the coherent motion signal. Microstimulation was applied on half the trials, selected randomly, and the psychophysical data were analyzed to determine whether stimulation of MST neurons influenced the monkeys' choices. 3. Microstimulation influenced the monkeys' performance in a statistically significant manner in 67% of the experiments. In all but one of the significant experiments, microstimulation biased the monkeys' choices toward the direction of motion encoded by MST neurons at the stimulation site. Microstimulation had little effect on the slopes of the psychometric functions, suggesting that the stimulation-induced neural activity resembled a relatively pure motion "signal" rather than "noise." 4. Microstimulation exerted strong effects on the monkeys' behavior only when the visual stimulus was located within the multiunit receptive field measured at the stimulation site. This kind of spatial specificity has also been observed in the middle temporal visual area (MT), but receptive fields in MST are typically much larger than those in MT. Thus MST microstimulation effects are characterized by a coarser spatial scale: stimulation of a single site in MST can influence judgements over a much larger portion of the visual field than equivalent stimulation in MT. 5. Microstimulation was often most effective when visual stimuli were placed within a particularly responsive subregion of the receptive field (a "hot spot"). 6. The results show that MST neurons, like MT neurons, can strongly influence performance on a direction discrimination task. Whether MT and MST influence the decision process in parallel or in series remains to be determined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7760110     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1995.73.2.437

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  40 in total

1.  Correlated firing in macaque visual area MT: time scales and relationship to behavior.

Authors:  W Bair; E Zohary; W T Newsome
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  The influence of behavioral context on the representation of a perceptual decision in developing oculomotor commands.

Authors:  Joshua I Gold; Michael N Shadlen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-01-15       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Insights into cortical mechanisms of behavior from microstimulation experiments.

Authors:  Mark H Histed; Amy M Ni; John H R Maunsell
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2012-01-28       Impact factor: 11.685

Review 4.  Manipulating neural activity in physiologically classified neurons: triumphs and challenges.

Authors:  Felicity Gore; Edmund C Schwartz; C Daniel Salzman
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-09-19       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Human MST but not MT responds to tactile stimulation.

Authors:  Michael S Beauchamp; Nafi E Yasar; Neel Kishan; Tony Ro
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Direction and contrast tuning of macaque MSTd neurons during saccades.

Authors:  Nathan A Crowder; Nicholas S C Price; Michael J Mustari; Michael R Ibbotson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Abnormalities of coherent motion processing in strabismic amblyopia: Visual-evoked potential measurements.

Authors:  Chuan Hou; Mark W Pettet; Anthony M Norcia
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging of early visual pathways in dyslexia.

Authors:  J B Demb; G M Boynton; D J Heeger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Motion processing streams in Drosophila are behaviorally specialized.

Authors:  Alexander Y Katsov; Thomas R Clandinin
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Interpreting temporal dynamics during sensory decision-making.

Authors:  Aaron J Levi; Alexander C Huk
Journal:  Curr Opin Physiol       Date:  2020-05-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.