Literature DB >> 7758055

Pharmacoeconomics of piperacillin/tazobactam and imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of patients with intra-abdominal infections.

S S Jhee1, M A Gill, A E Yellin, T V Berne, P N Heseltine, M D Appleman.   

Abstract

Costs involved in using piperacillin 4 g/tazobactam 500 mg, given as intermittent intravenous infusions every 8 hours, were compared with those for imipenem/cilastatin 500 mg, given as intermittent intravenous infusions every 6 hours, for the treatment of patients with gangrenous or perforated appendicitis. A total of 88 patients were included in our cost analyses: 42 patients in the piperacillin/tazobactam group and 46 patients in the imipenem/cilastatin group. Durations (mean +/- SD) of antibiotic therapies were 7.8 +/- 3.3 days and 7.1 +/- 2.6 days for the piperacillin/tazobactam and imipenem/cilastatin groups, respectively. No statistical significance was found for the difference in duration of therapy (P = 0.376). Total drug treatment costs were $538.83 +/- $385.33 for the piperacillin/tazobactam group and $687.66 +/- $345.37 for the imipenem/cilastatin group. This difference in treatment cost was statistically significant (P = 0.0001). The need for laboratory tests and the use of other medications were not different between the two groups. Total hospital-days charges were higher for the piperacillin/tazobactam group ($18,339.76 +/- $6090.38) compared with the imipenem/cilastatin group ($16,150.00 +/- $5088.60) (P = 0.052). These findings suggest that length of hospital stay should be the economic focus of antibiotic therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7758055     DOI: 10.1016/0149-2918(95)80013-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Ther        ISSN: 0149-2918            Impact factor:   3.393


  7 in total

Review 1.  Monobactams and carbapenems for treatment of intraabdominal infections.

Authors:  B Brismar; C E Nord
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.553

Review 2.  Piperacillin/tazobactam: an updated review of its use in the treatment of bacterial infections.

Authors:  C M Perry; A Markham
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  Piperacillin/tazobactam: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in moderate to severe bacterial infections.

Authors:  M Young; G L Plosker
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  Imipenem/cilastatin: an update of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetics and therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of serious infections.

Authors:  J A Balfour; H M Bryson; R N Brogden
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Cost efficacy of tazobactam/piperacillin versus imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of intra-abdominal infection.

Authors:  E S Dietrich; B Schubert; W Ebner; F Daschner
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Cost effectiveness of ciprofloxacin plus metronidazole versus imipenem-cilastatin in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections.

Authors:  D J Walters; J S Solomkin; J A Paladino
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 7.  Carbapenems versus other beta-lactams in treating severe infections in intensive care: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  S J Edwards; M J Clarke; S Wordsworth; C E Emmas
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2008-03-29       Impact factor: 3.267

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.