Literature DB >> 7754895

Localization of specific joint causing hindfoot pain: value of injecting local anesthetics into individual joints during arthrography.

M J Mitchell1, D Bielecki, A G Bergman, S Kursunoglu-Brahme, D J Sartoris, D Resnick.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility of selective injection of local anesthetic into hindfoot articulations for localizing the source of posttraumatic pain and to compare clinical response with the severity of degenerative change in the various articulations evident on plain radiographs or CT scans. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Anesthetic arthrography was performed in 18 patients with posttraumatic hindfoot pain. In all, 32 joints were assessed: 15 talocalcaneonavicular, 11 subtalar, five ankle, and one calcaneocuboid. Following intraarticular injection of a mixture of equal amounts of meglumine diatrizoate 60%, lidocaine 1%, and bupivacaine 0.25%, patients were asked to grade the degree of pain relief they experienced on a scale from 0% to 100%. The degree of degenerative changes seen on preliminary radiographs and CT scans was graded blindly and retrospectively by an experienced musculoskeletal radiologist using a 3-point scale (grade 0 indicated a normal joint, grade 1 indicated mild to moderate degenerative change, and grade 2 indicated severe degenerative change). The value of findings on both routine radiographs and CT scans as predictors of the degree of symptomatic relief obtained from specific joint injections was determined. Arthrodesis was performed in nine patients on the basis of the results of anesthetic injections.
RESULTS: The degree of pain relief experienced after intraarticular injection of anesthetic correlated with the severity of degenerative change as assessed by routine radiography in 15 of 32 joints and as assessed by CT in eight of 18 joints. In 14 of 32 joints assessed by routine radiography and in seven of 18 joints assessed by CT, the amount of pain relief achieved by anesthetic arthrography was less than that predicted by imaging evidence of degenerative disease. In five of 32 joints judged normal on plain film radiographs, significant pain relief was experienced following anesthetic injection, resulting in a change in the proposed surgical procedure. Long-term follow-up indicated satisfactory results in eight of the nine patients in whom arthrodesis was performed.
CONCLUSION: Selective intraarticular anesthetic injections afford a direct method of confirming the site of hindfoot pain and may aid in surgical planning, because plain film radiography or CT may underestimate or poorly indicate the most symptomatic articulations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7754895     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.164.6.7754895

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  16 in total

Review 1.  Impingement syndromes of the ankle.

Authors:  Philip Robinson
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-05-15       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  CT of the musculoskeletal system: what is left is the days of MRI?

Authors:  A T H West; T J Marshall; P W Bearcroft
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-08-09       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Accuracy of posterior subtalar joint injection without fluoroscopy.

Authors:  Kevin L Kirk; John T Campbell; Gregory P Guyton; Lew C Schon
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Diagnostic and therapeutic joint injections.

Authors:  Salvatore Masala; Roberto Fiori; Dario Alberto Bartolucci; Matteo Mammucari; Giorgios Angelopoulos; Francesco Massari; Giovanni Simonetti
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 5.  Pearls and pitfalls of fluoroscopic-guided foot and ankle injections: what the radiologist needs to know.

Authors:  Barry G Hansford; Megan K Mills; Christopher J Hanrahan; Corrie M Yablon
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  The posterolateral fluoroscopy-guided injection technique into the posterior subtalar joint: description of the procedure and pilot study on patient outcomes.

Authors:  Florian M Buck; Christian W A Pfirrmann; Florian Brunner; Juerg Hodler; Cynthia Peterson
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  US in ankle impingement syndrome.

Authors:  Lionel Pesquer; Stephane Guillo; Philippe Meyer; Olivier Hauger
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2013-11-26

8.  Percutaneous foot joint needle placement using a C-arm flat-panel detector CT.

Authors:  Martin Wiewiorski; Martin Thanh Long Takes; Victor Valderrabano; Augustinus Ludwig Jacob
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2011-06-19       Impact factor: 2.924

9.  Radiation dose and intra-articular access: comparison of the lateral mortise and anterior midline approaches to fluoroscopically guided tibiotalar joint injections.

Authors:  Ambrose J Huang; Rene Balza; Martin Torriani; Miriam A Bredella; Connie Y Chang; Frank J Simeone; William E Palmer
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-11-28       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Tarsometatarsal joint communication during fluoroscopy-guided therapeutic joint injections and relationship with patient age and degree of osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Yoshimi Endo; O Kenechi Nwawka; Shrita Smith; Jayme C Burket
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.