OBJECTIVE: Twenty-three patients with suspected aortic dissection were evaluated in this preliminary study of helical CT to determine the usefulness of axial sections, multiplanar reformation, and three-dimensional (3D) rendering in assessing the presence of dissection and the extent of intimal flap. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were referred for helical CT scanning because of chest pain or an abnormal chest radiograph. Scans were performed during bolus injection of nonionic contrast material at 2.0-2.5 ml/sec using a mean scan delay of 47 sec. Axial scans with 5-mm collimation were obtained in all patients. They extended from the great vessels to the distal thoracic aorta just above the hiatus. Delayed nonhelical sections were obtained through the upper abdomen. Multiplanar reformations and 3D models were reconstructed from the helical data in 13 patients and were compared to axial sections in 7 patients who proved to have documented dissection. The efficacy of CT was determined using surgery, angiography, or clinical outcome to establish the diagnosis. RESULTS: Of the 23 patients studied, axial sections resulted in 15 true-negative, 7 true-positive, and 1 false-positive interpretation. In three of seven patients with dissection, it was difficult to determine the extent of the intimal flap on axial sections; multiplanar reformation or 3D views clarified the relevant anatomy in all 3 cases. Among the 3D display methods, ray-sum projection views were superior to surface model or maximum-intensity-projection views. CONCLUSION: If studies of larger numbers of patients confirm our preliminary findings, multiplanar reformation and 3D rendering of helical CT scans will be a valuable addition to axial display of CT studies used to detect aortic dissection and to determine the extent of the intimal flap.
OBJECTIVE: Twenty-three patients with suspected aortic dissection were evaluated in this preliminary study of helical CT to determine the usefulness of axial sections, multiplanar reformation, and three-dimensional (3D) rendering in assessing the presence of dissection and the extent of intimal flap. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Patients were referred for helical CT scanning because of chest pain or an abnormal chest radiograph. Scans were performed during bolus injection of nonionic contrast material at 2.0-2.5 ml/sec using a mean scan delay of 47 sec. Axial scans with 5-mm collimation were obtained in all patients. They extended from the great vessels to the distal thoracic aorta just above the hiatus. Delayed nonhelical sections were obtained through the upper abdomen. Multiplanar reformations and 3D models were reconstructed from the helical data in 13 patients and were compared to axial sections in 7 patients who proved to have documented dissection. The efficacy of CT was determined using surgery, angiography, or clinical outcome to establish the diagnosis. RESULTS: Of the 23 patients studied, axial sections resulted in 15 true-negative, 7 true-positive, and 1 false-positive interpretation. In three of seven patients with dissection, it was difficult to determine the extent of the intimal flap on axial sections; multiplanar reformation or 3D views clarified the relevant anatomy in all 3 cases. Among the 3D display methods, ray-sum projection views were superior to surface model or maximum-intensity-projection views. CONCLUSION: If studies of larger numbers of patients confirm our preliminary findings, multiplanar reformation and 3D rendering of helical CT scans will be a valuable addition to axial display of CT studies used to detect aortic dissection and to determine the extent of the intimal flap.
Authors: C Catalano; F Fraioli; M Danti; A Napoli; V Votta; K Lanciotti; L Bertoletti; R Passariello Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 5.315