Literature DB >> 1559451

[The endosonographic staging of pancreatic carcinoma].

T Rösch1, H J Dittler, R Lorenz, C Braig, T Gain, S Feuerbach, H Höfler, J R Siewert, M Classen.   

Abstract

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), conventional ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT) and angiography were compared in their assessment of local resectability in 35 consecutive patients (19 men, 16 women; mean age 49.8 [42-821] years) with non-metastatic carcinoma of the pancreas. The findings were made prospectively and independently of each other. EUS proved to be superior to transabdominal US and to CT in the diagnosis of tumour infiltration of the portal and splenic veins. For the portal vein the sensitivity was 93% by EUS, 14% by US and 36% by CT. Corresponding figures for the splenic vein were 92%, 39% and 69%. EUS was markedly superior to angiography in the diagnosis of portal vein involvement (sensitivity of 93% and 36%, respectively), but the two methods had similar sensitivity regarding splenic vein infiltration (92 and 100%). Tumour involvement of the coeliac trunk was diagnosed with higher sensitivity angiographically (86%) than by EUS (57%), CT (71%) or US (29%). Regarding T and N staging, EUS was superior to both US and CT. These data indicate that EUS is the most accurate method for local tumour staging of potentially resectable pancreatic carcinoma. It can replace angiography in the diagnosis of portal vein infiltration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1559451     DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1062347

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr        ISSN: 0012-0472            Impact factor:   0.628


  9 in total

Review 1.  Diagnostic accuracy of different imaging modalities following computed tomography (CT) scanning for assessing the resectability with curative intent in pancreatic and periampullary cancer.

Authors:  Domenico Tamburrino; Deniece Riviere; Mohammad Yaghoobi; Brian R Davidson; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-09-15

2.  Role of endoscopic ultrasound in gastrointestinal surgery.

Authors:  Biswanath P Gouda; Tarun Gupta
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 0.656

Review 3.  Applications of endoscopic ultrasound in pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Leticia Perondi Luz; Mohammad Ali Al-Haddad; Michael Sai Lai Sey; John M DeWitt
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Staging gastrointestinal cancer as a precondition for multimodal treatment.

Authors:  J R Siewert; A Sendler; H J Dittler; U Fink; H Höfler
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1995 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Localisation of neuroendocrine tumours of the upper gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  T Zimmer; K Ziegler; M Bäder; U Fett; B Hamm; E O Riecken; B Wiedenmann
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  [Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors after resection of ductal pancreatic carcinomas].

Authors:  J Klempnauer; G J Ridder; H Bektas; R Pichlmayr
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1995

7.  Diagnostic Ability of Convex-Arrayed Endoscopic Ultrasonography for Major Vascular Invasion in Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Yuki Fujii; Kazuyuki Matsumoto; Hironari Kato; Yosuke Saragai; Saimon Takada; Sho Mizukawa; Shinichiro Muro; Daisuke Uchida; Takeshi Tomoda; Shigeru Horiguchi; Noriyuki Tanaka; Hiroyuki Okada
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2019-05-16

8.  Comparative analysis and assessment of diagnostic accuracy of 256 slice CT and endoscopic ultrasound in evaluation of pancreatic masses.

Authors:  Surabhi Gupta; Sunil K Puri
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2020-10-15

Review 9.  The Role of Endoscopic Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis and Staging of Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Ali Zakaria; Bayan Al-Share; Jason B Klapman; Aamir Dam
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 6.639

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.