Literature DB >> 7754078

Remembering, familiarity, and source monitoring.

M A Conway1, S A Dewhurst.   

Abstract

Two experiments investigated recollective experience in a source monitoring task. Subjects saw an array of objects and performed, watched, or imagined actions involving pairs of objects. In a subsequent recognition test, subjects indicated whether their recognition judgements were made on the basis of conscious recollective experience ("remember" responses), or on some other basis such as familiarity ("know" responses). The proportions of correct "remember" responses for both objects and actions decreased from performed, through watched, to imagined actions, whereas the proportions of correct "know" responses were uninfluenced by the source of the memories. In addition, the relationship between recollective experience and accuracy of source judgement varied across sources. Source accuracy for performed actions was obtained only in "remember" responses, whereas source accuracy for performed actions was obtained only in "remember" responses, whereas source accuracy for imagined actions was obtained only in "know" responses. Source accuracy for watched actions was obtained in both "remember" and "know" responses. The findings suggest that the types of memory attributes available at retrieval determine the quality of subsequent memory experience, and it is proposed that memories with strongly self-referential attributes (arising from performed actions) powerfully cue recollective experience during retrieval.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7754078     DOI: 10.1080/14640749508401380

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A        ISSN: 0272-4987


  16 in total

1.  Familiarity and recollection in item and associative recognition.

Authors:  W E Hockley; A Consoli
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-07

2.  Shades of the mirror effect: recognition of faces with and without sunglasses.

Authors:  W E Hockley; D H Hemsworth; A Consoli
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-01

3.  Remember-know judgments can depend on how memory is tested.

Authors:  J L Hicks; R L Marsh
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-03

4.  Memory for actions: enactment and source memory.

Authors:  Susan L Hornstein; Neil W Mulligan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-04

5.  Associative interference in recognition memory: a dual-process account.

Authors:  Michael F Verde
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-12

6.  Hippocampal activation for autobiographical memories over the entire lifetime in healthy aged subjects: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Armelle Viard; Pascale Piolino; Béatrice Desgranges; Gaël Chételat; Karine Lebreton; Brigitte Landeau; Alan Young; Vincent De La Sayette; Francis Eustache
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2007-01-04       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  The role of decision processes in remembering and knowing.

Authors:  W Donaldson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1996-07

8.  Evaluating characteristics of false memories: remember/know judgments and memory characteristics questionnaire compared.

Authors:  M Mather; L A Henkel; M K Johnson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1997-11

9.  Placing a text in context.

Authors:  Debra L Long; Alice Spooner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-04

10.  Remember judgments and the constraint of direct experience.

Authors:  Elisabeth Stoettinger; Wolfgang Kaiser; Josef Perner
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-11-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.