Literature DB >> 7751894

Positron emission tomography studies in patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic breast cancer: a method for early therapy evaluation?

T Jansson1, J E Westlin, H Ahlström, A Lilja, B Långström, J Bergh.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate if sequential positron emission tomographic (PET) scans with the glucose analog 18F-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (18FDG) and/or L-methyl-11C-methionine (11C-methionine) in patients with breast cancer could provide early information on the efficacy of polychemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixteen patients with breast cancer (11 with locally advanced tumors, three with recurrent disease in the contralateral breast, two of them with distant and regional metastases, and two with distant metastases) underwent a baseline and two follow-up PET scans after the first and third/fourth polychemotherapy course. Tumor response was determined clinically/radiographically after three/four polychemotherapy courses.
RESULTS: Five patients were investigated with 18FDG, seven with both 11C-methionine and 18FDG, and four with only 11C-methionine before polychemotherapy. 11C-methionine presented a more distinct visualization of primary/contralateral breast cancers in five of seven patients when compared with 18FDG. Twelve of 16 patients demonstrated a response using conventional methods after the third/fourth course of polychemotherapy. Eight of these 12 clinical responders had a significant decrease in tracer uptake at the first PET scan performed 6 to 13 days after the first polychemotherapy course, and these reductions were further augmented after the third/fourth course and corresponded to the conventional therapy evaluation (clinical examination, computed tomography [CT], ultrasonography, and mammography).
CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that PET may be of clinical value in predicting response to chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced breast cancer and/or metastatic disease earlier than any other method used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7751894     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1995.13.6.1470

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  48 in total

1.  Bone marrow involvement in breast cancer detected by positron emission tomography.

Authors:  C R Lewanski; G R Kaplan; J Potter; P Richman; R F Ashford; W L Wong
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 2.  Positron emission tomography (PET): expanding the horizons of oncology drug development.

Authors:  Lisa A Hammond; Louis Denis; Umber Salman; Paul Jerabek; Charles R Thomas; John G Kuhn
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 3.  PET/CT and breast cancer.

Authors:  Barbara Zangheri; Cristina Messa; Maria Picchio; Luigi Gianolli; Claudio Landoni; Ferruccio Fazio
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-05-05       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 4.  FDG-PET in monitoring therapy of breast cancer.

Authors:  H-J Biersack; H Bender; H Palmedo
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-04-27       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 5.  Measuring response to chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer: methodological considerations.

Authors:  Nanda C Krak; Otto S Hoekstra; Adriaan A Lammertsma
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-04-22       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Can FDG PET/CT monitor the response to hormonal therapy in breast cancer patients?

Authors:  Laura Evangelista; Domenico Rubello; Giorgio Saladini
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Whither the PET scan? The role of PET imaging in the staging and treatment of breast cancer.

Authors:  Alessandra Gennari; Arnoldo Piccardo; Vania Altrinetti; Davide Corradengo; Giampiero Villavecchia; Andrea De Censi
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.075

8.  Effects of ROI definition and reconstruction method on quantitative outcome and applicability in a response monitoring trial.

Authors:  Nanda C Krak; R Boellaard; Otto S Hoekstra; Jos W R Twisk; Corneline J Hoekstra; Adriaan A Lammertsma
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Measuring [(18)F]FDG uptake in breast cancer during chemotherapy: comparison of analytical methods.

Authors:  Nanda C Krak; Jacobus J M van der Hoeven; Otto S Hoekstra; Jos W R Twisk; Elsken van der Wall; Adriaan A Lammertsma
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-03-15       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Degree of tumor FDG uptake correlates with proliferation index in triple negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Julia Tchou; Seema S Sonnad; Meredith R Bergey; Sandip Basu; John Tomaszewski; Abass Alavi; Mitchell Schnall
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2009-12-12       Impact factor: 3.488

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.