| Literature DB >> 7749284 |
M Kikuchi1, M Watanabe, R Nakamura, S Endo, Y Kuwata, K Saito, K Inada, M Yoshida.
Abstract
Under the hypothesis that portal endotoxemia, which has been considered evidence of endogenous endotoxemia, is actually a false-positive reaction of the Limulus test, the conventional method of determination, Toxicolor (TOX) and a new endotoxin-specific method, Endospecy (ES) were investigated, whereby portal endotoxemia was reexamined. Peripheral and portal blood samples were collected from 12 patients at various intervals during surgery for esophageal varices, and then evaluated by TOX and ES, the normal values of which are under 60.0 pg/ml and under 9.8 pg/ml, respectively. The mean peripheral and portal endotoxin (Et) levels by TOX were 23.1 pg/ml and 38.9 pg/ml, 1.5 h after the start of surgery, which continued to increase thereafter, the corresponding levels being 48.1 pg/ml and 58.7 pg/ml 8 h after the start of surgery, respectively. The portal Et levels were significantly higher by ES, indicating portal endotoxemia, the mean peripheral and portal Et levels being 6.9 pg/ml, and 6.5 pg/ml, 1.5 h after the start of surgery, these levels showing changes within a similar range. The levels determined by the conventional TOX method increased with time, to a portal Et level of 5.0 pg/ml 8 h after the start of surgery, whereas those determined by ES changed within the same range suggesting that the onset of portal endotoxemia primarily involves the G-factors and that endogenous endotoxemia does not occur.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 1995 PMID: 7749284 DOI: 10.1007/BF00309379
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Surg Today ISSN: 0941-1291 Impact factor: 2.549