Literature DB >> 7748200

Blockade of sensory neuron action potentials by a static magnetic field in the 10 mT range.

M J McLean1, R R Holcomb, A W Wamil, J D Pickett, A V Cavopol.   

Abstract

To characterize the inhibitory effect of a static magnetic field, action potentials (AP) were elicited by intracellular application of 1 ms depolarizing current pulses of constant amplitude to the somata of adult mouse dorsal root ganglion neurons in monolayer dissociated cell culture. During the control period, < 5% of stimuli failed to elicit AP. During exposure to an approximately 11 mT static magnetic field at the cell position produced by an array of four permanent center-charged neodymium magnets of alternating polarity (MAG-4A), 66% of stimuli failed to elicit AP. The number of failures was maximal after about 200-250 s in the field and returned gradually to baseline over 400-600 s. A direct or indirect effect on the conformation of AP generating sodium channels could account for these results because 1) failure was preceded often by reduction of maximal rate of rise, an indirect measure of sodium current; 2) recovery was significantly prolonged in more than one-half of neurons that were not stimulated during exposure to the MAG-4A field; and 3) resting membrane potential, input resistance, and chronaxie were unaffected by the field. The effect was diminished or prevented by moving the MAG-4A array along the X or Z axis away from the neuron under study and by increasing the distance between magnets in the XY plane. Reduction of AP firing during exposure to the approximately 0.1 mT field produced by a MAG-4A array of micromagnets was about the same as that produced by a MAG-4A array of the large magnets above. The approximately 28 mT field produced at cell position by two magnets of alternating polarity and the approximately 88 mT field produced by a single magnet had no significant effect on AP firing. These findings suggest that field strength alone cannot account for AP blockade.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7748200     DOI: 10.1002/bem.2250160108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics        ISSN: 0197-8462            Impact factor:   2.010


  16 in total

1.  Involvement of Na+/K+ pump in fine modulation of bursting activity of the snail Br neuron by 10 mT static magnetic field.

Authors:  Ljiljana Nikolić; Nataša Todorović; Joanna Zakrzewska; Marina Stanić; Snežana Rauš; Aleksandar Kalauzi; Branka Janać
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Flexible magnets are not effective in decreasing pain perception and recovery time after muscle microinjury.

Authors:  P A Borsa; C L Liggett
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Effects of weak environmental magnetic fields on the spontaneous bioelectrical activity of snail neurons.

Authors:  Mehri Kaviani Moghadam; Mohammad Firoozabadi; Mahyar Janahmadi
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 1.843

Review 4.  Acupuncture in the neonatal intensive care unit-using ancient medicine to help today's babies: a review.

Authors:  K L Chen; I Quah-Smith; G M Schmölzer; R Niemtzow; J L Oei
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 2.521

5.  Static magnetic field therapy for carpal tunnel syndrome: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Agatha P Colbert; Marko S Markov; Nels Carlson; William L Gregory; Hans Carlson; Patricia J Elmer
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.966

6.  Therapeutic Magnets Do Not Affect Tissue Temperatures.

Authors:  Kathleen B. Sweeney; Mark A. Merrick; Christopher D. Ingersoll; John A. Swez
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  Near-field electromagnetic holography for high-resolution analysis of network interactions in neuronal tissue.

Authors:  Henrik D Kjeldsen; Marcus Kaiser; Miles A Whittington
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 2.390

Review 8.  Bioeffects of static magnetic fields: oxidative stress, genotoxic effects, and cancer studies.

Authors:  Soumaya Ghodbane; Aida Lahbib; Mohsen Sakly; Hafedh Abdelmelek
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 9.  Promising avenues of therapeutics for bipolar illness.

Authors:  Robert M Post
Journal:  Dialogues Clin Neurosci       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.986

10.  Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Protective Patches on Acupoints to Preserve the Bioenergetic Status against Magnetic Fields.

Authors:  Claudio Molinari; Ian Stoppa; Nicola Limardo; Francesca Uberti
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 2.629

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.