Literature DB >> 7745452

Wakeful response to command indicates memory potential during emergence from general anesthesia.

R C Dutton1, W D Smith, N T Smith.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: An important aspect of assessing anesthetic depth is determining whether a patient will remember events during surgery. We looked for a clinical sign that would indicate a patient's potential for memory formation during emergence from anesthesia. A clinical sign indicating memory potential could be a useful endpoint for measuring the performance of anesthetic depth monitors and for titrating administration of anesthetic agents.
METHODS: We evaluated patients' responses to commands to open the eyes, squeeze the hand four times, and count 20 numbers. These responses were correlated with results on recall, cued recall, and multiple-choice memory tests. MAIN
RESULTS: Patients did not have evidence of memory formation until they sustained wakefulness sufficiently long to complete at least four hand squeezes or count four numbers. Of 28 patients, 13 (46%) with this sustained wakeful response had memory. Of 22 patients, 0 (0%) had evidence of memory formation when they demonstrated a brief wakeful response, defined as being responsive to command but unable to complete more than one hand squeeze or count, or an intermediate response, defined as two or three hand squeezes or counts.
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that a brief wakeful response to command indicates that a patient is unlikely to form memories, while a sustained wakeful response indicates that a patient may form memories. Thus, a patient's wakeful response to command could be a useful indicator of potential for memory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7745452     DOI: 10.1007/BF01627418

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit        ISSN: 0748-1977


  30 in total

1.  Levels of consciousness in volunteers breathing sub-MAC concentrations of isoflurane.

Authors:  D E Newton; C Thornton; K Konieczko; C D Frith; C J Doré; N R Webster; N P Luff
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 9.166

2.  Conscious awareness during general anaesthesia--what are we attempting to monitor?

Authors:  J Jessop; J G Jones
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 9.166

3.  Oesophageal contractility during total i.v. anaesthesia with and without glycopyrronium.

Authors:  S Raftery; G Enever; C Prys-Roberts
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 9.166

4.  Failure of lower esophageal contractility to predict patient movement in children anesthetized with halothane and nitrous oxide.

Authors:  M F Watcha; P F White
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  Awareness and memory in anaesthetized patients.

Authors:  D Griffiths; J G Jones
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 9.166

6.  Mechanisms of memory.

Authors:  L R Squire
Journal:  Science       Date:  1986-06-27       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  States of awareness during general anaesthesia. Preliminary communication.

Authors:  B W Levinson
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1965-07       Impact factor: 9.166

8.  Subanesthetic concentrations of isoflurane suppress learning as defined by the category-example task.

Authors:  B S Chortkoff; H L Bennett; E I Eger
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 7.892

9.  Effects of thiopental sedation on learning and memory.

Authors:  A G Osborn; J P Bunker; L M Cooper; G S Frank; E R Hilgard
Journal:  Science       Date:  1967-08-04       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Lower esophageal contractility predicts movement during skin incision in patients anesthetized with halothane, but not with nitrous oxide and alfentanil.

Authors:  D I Sessler; R Støen; C I Olofsson; F Chow
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 7.892

View more
  10 in total

1.  Limitation in monitoring depth of anesthesia: a case report.

Authors:  Marco Cascella; Francesca Bifulco; Daniela Viscardi; Maura C Tracey; Domenico Carbone; Arturo Cuomo
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Cerebral state index versus bispectral index during propofol-fentanyl-nitrous oxide anesthesia.

Authors:  Tomoki Nishiyama; Kyoko Komatsu
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 3.  Using EEG to monitor anesthesia drug effects during surgery.

Authors:  Leslie C Jameson; Tod B Sloan
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Non-stationarity of EEG during wakefulness and anaesthesia: advantages of EEG permutation entropy monitoring.

Authors:  Matthias Kreuzer; Eberhard F Kochs; Gerhard Schneider; Denis Jordan
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2014-01-18       Impact factor: 2.502

5.  Awareness during anaesthesia.

Authors:  K Sandhu; Hh Dash
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2009-04

6.  EEG Predicts movement response to surgical stimuli during general anesthesia with combinations of isoflurane, 70% N2O, and fentanyl.

Authors:  R C Dutton; W D Smith; N T Smith
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1996-03

7.  Craniofacial electromyogram activation response: another indicator of anesthetic depth.

Authors:  R C Dutton; W D Smith; H L Bennett; S Archer; N T Smith
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.502

8.  Brief wakeful response to command indicates wakefulness with suppression of memory formation during surgical anesthesia.

Authors:  R C Dutton; W D Smith; N T Smith
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1995-01

Review 9.  The Neural Circuits Underlying General Anesthesia and Sleep.

Authors:  Olivia A Moody; Edlyn R Zhang; Kathleen F Vincent; Risako Kato; Eric D Melonakos; Christa J Nehs; Ken Solt
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 10.  Awareness and recall during general anesthesia.

Authors:  Hyun Sik Chung
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2014-05-26
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.