Literature DB >> 7745453

Brief wakeful response to command indicates wakefulness with suppression of memory formation during surgical anesthesia.

R C Dutton1, W D Smith, N T Smith.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In a previous study of patients emerging from anesthesia following surgery, we found that a brief wakeful response to command of an eye opening or single hand squeeze or count was not associated with memory formation, while the response of four hand squeezes or counts was associated with memory. We wanted to determine the anesthetic requirements for obtaining this brief wakeful response endpoint during surgery and to determine if memory occurred at this endpoint during surgical anesthesia.
METHODS: Six different combinations of isoflurane, 70% N2O, and fentanyl were administered to 326 patients undergoing pelvic laparoscopy. After insertion of the trocar, anesthesia was reduced while patients were given verbal commands, and they were observed for movement responses to surgery and to command. Patients were classified as either not arousing, arousing with a movement response to surgery, or arousing with a wakeful response to command. For the patients who aroused, we calculated the percentage of arousal responses that were wakeful responses to command. The effect of fentanyl dosage upon the percentage of arousal responses that were wakeful responses to command was determined by using a Mann-Whitney test to compare a group of patients receiving fentanyl 2 micrograms/kg or less, with a group receiving fentanyl 4 micrograms/kg. In a subset of 39 patients, the potential for memory formation was evaluated by presenting a target sound to 29 patients during a period of either no arousal, movement response to surgery, or wakeful response to command; for a control group of 10 patients, no target sound was presented. All 39 patients were tested for memory of the target sound; the results from each group receiving a target sound were compared with the results of the control group, using a Mann-Whitney test. MAIN
RESULTS: A total of 68 patients aroused with either a movement response or a wakeful response to command. Wakeful responses occurred with only 1 of 39 patients (3%) receiving fentanyl 2 micrograms/kg or less; but, wakeful responses occurred with 17 of 29 patients (59%) receiving fentanyl 4 micrograms/kg. The difference between the groups was significant at p = 0.01. None of the 68 patients had recall of intraoperative events or unpleasant dreams. None of these patients who were in the multiple-choice memory subset recalled the target sound. There were no statistically significant differences on the multiple-choice memory test between the groups presented with the target sound and the control group. Patient anecdotes suggested that some patients may have had memory of the target sound; but, memory was no more likely in patients with a brief wakeful response to command than in those who responded with a movement to surgical stimulation or those who did not have an arousal response.
CONCLUSIONS: A brief wakeful response to a command of opening the eyes or squeezing the hand was not associated with increased memory formation during surgery. A brief wakeful response to command was found during surgery when patients received fentanyl 4 micrograms/kg; but it was rarely found at fentanyl dosages of 2 micrograms/kg or less.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7745453     DOI: 10.1007/BF01627419

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit        ISSN: 0748-1977


  13 in total

1.  Detecting wakefulness during general anaesthesia for caesarean section.

Authors:  M E Tunstall
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1977-05-21

2.  Comparison of wakefulness with two anaesthetic regimens. Total i.v. v. balanced anaesthesia.

Authors:  I F Russell
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 9.166

3.  Auditory perception under anaesthesia.

Authors:  I F Russell
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 6.955

4.  Minimum alveolar concentrations in man on awakening from methoxyflurane, halothane, ether and fluroxene anesthesia: MAC awake.

Authors:  R K Stoelting; D E Longnecker; E I Eger
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1970-07       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  Pregnancy decreases the requirement for inhaled anesthetic agents.

Authors:  R J Palahniuk; S M Shnider; E I Eger
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 7.892

6.  Balanced anesthesia: does it anesthetize?

Authors:  I F Russell
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 5.108

7.  Recognition of words presented during general anaesthesia.

Authors:  K Millar; N Watkinson
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Detecting awareness during general anaesthetic caesarean section. An evaluation of two methods.

Authors:  D G Bogod; J K Orton; H M Yau; T E Oh
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 6.955

9.  Wakefulness during cesarean section after anesthetic induction with ketamine, thiopental, or ketamine and thiopental combined.

Authors:  R R Schultetus; C R Hill; C M Dharamraj; T E Banner; L S Berman
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 5.108

10.  Di-ethyl ether analgesia: a detailed description of the first stage of ether anesthesia in man.

Authors:  J F ARTUSIO
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1954-07       Impact factor: 4.030

View more
  6 in total

1.  Limitation in monitoring depth of anesthesia: a case report.

Authors:  Marco Cascella; Francesca Bifulco; Daniela Viscardi; Maura C Tracey; Domenico Carbone; Arturo Cuomo
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  Non-stationarity of EEG during wakefulness and anaesthesia: advantages of EEG permutation entropy monitoring.

Authors:  Matthias Kreuzer; Eberhard F Kochs; Gerhard Schneider; Denis Jordan
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2014-01-18       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Anaesthesia monitoring by recurrence quantification analysis of EEG data.

Authors:  Klaus Becker; Gerhard Schneider; Matthias Eder; Andreas Ranft; Eberhard F Kochs; Walter Zieglgänsberger; Hans-Ulrich Dodt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-01-26       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  EEG Predicts movement response to surgical stimuli during general anesthesia with combinations of isoflurane, 70% N2O, and fentanyl.

Authors:  R C Dutton; W D Smith; N T Smith
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1996-03

5.  Craniofacial electromyogram activation response: another indicator of anesthetic depth.

Authors:  R C Dutton; W D Smith; H L Bennett; S Archer; N T Smith
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.502

6.  Anesthesia awareness. Can midazolam attenuate or prevent memory consolidation on intraoperative awakening during general anesthesia without increasing the risk of postoperative delirium?

Authors:  Marco Cascella
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2015-04
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.