Literature DB >> 7742676

Effectiveness of health checks conducted by nurses in primary care: final results of the OXCHECK study. Imperial Cancer Research Fund OXCHECK Study Group.

.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of health checks, performed by nurses in primary care, in reducing risk factors for cardiovascular disease and cancer.
DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial.
SETTING: Five urban general practices in Bedfordshire.
SUBJECTS: 2205 men and women who were randomly allocated a first health check in 1989-90 and a re-examination in 1992-3 (the intervention group); 1916 men and women who were randomly allocated an initial health check in 1992-3 (the control group). All subjects were aged 35-64 at recruitment in 1989. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Serum total cholesterol concentration, blood pressure, body mass index, and smoking prevalence (with biochemical validation of cessation); self reported dietary, exercise, and alcohol habits.
RESULTS: Mean serum total cholesterol was 3.1% lower in the intervention group than controls (difference 0.19 mmol/l (95% confidence interval 0.12 to 0.26)); in women it was 4.5% lower (P < 0.0001) and in men 1.6% (P < 0.05), a significant difference between the sexes (P < 0.01). Self reported saturated fat intake was also significantly lower in the intervention group. Systolic and diastolic blood pressures and body mass index were respectively 1.9%, 1.9%, and 1.4% lower in the intervention group (P < 0.005 in all cases). There was a 3.9% (2.4 to 5.3) difference in the percentage of subjects with a cholesterol concentration > or = 8 mmol/l, but no significant differences in the number with diastolic blood pressure > or = 100 mm Hg or body mass index > or = 30 kg/m2. There was no significant difference between the two groups in prevalence of smoking or excessive alcohol use. Annual rechecks were no more effective than a single recheck at three years, but health checks led to a significant increase in visits to the nurse according to patients' degree of cardiovascular risk.
CONCLUSIONS: The benefits of health checks were sustained over three years. The main effects were to promote dietary change and reduce cholesterol concentrations; small differences in blood pressure may have been attributable to accommodation to measurement. The benefits of systematic health promotion in primary care are real, but must be weighed against the costs in relation to other priorities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7742676      PMCID: PMC2549499     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  19 in total

1.  Health checks--time to check out?

Authors:  D Mant
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Health promotion: the ethical dimension.

Authors:  J McCormick
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1994-08-06       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Screening for cardiovascular risk in general practice.

Authors:  N Stott
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-01-29

4.  The limits to health promotion.

Authors:  N C Stott; P Kinnersley; S Rollnick
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-10-15

Review 5.  Antioxidants and cardiovascular disease: a review.

Authors:  J E Manson; J M Gaziano; M A Jonas; C H Hennekens
Journal:  J Am Coll Nutr       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Cardiovascular risk and attitudes to lifestyle: what do patients think?

Authors:  C Silagy; J Muir; A Coulter; M Thorogood; L Roe
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-06-19

7.  Dietary intervention in primary care: validity of the DINE method for diet assessment.

Authors:  L Roe; C Strong; C Whiteside; A Neil; D Mant
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 2.267

8.  Factors affecting response to an invitation to attend for a health check.

Authors:  M Thorogood; A Coulter; L Jones; P Yudkin; J Muir; D Mant
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 3.710

9.  By how much and how quickly does reduction in serum cholesterol concentration lower risk of ischaemic heart disease?

Authors:  M R Law; N J Wald; S G Thompson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-02-05

10.  Meta-analysis on efficacy of nicotine replacement therapies in smoking cessation.

Authors:  C Silagy; D Mant; G Fowler; M Lodge
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1994-01-15       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  59 in total

1.  Follow up care in general practice of patients with myocardial infarction and angina. Trial was underpowered.

Authors:  J Robson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-08-07

Review 2.  Development and evaluation of complex interventions in health services research: case study of the Southampton heart integrated care project (SHIP). The SHIP Collaborative Group.

Authors:  F Bradley; R Wiles; A L Kinmonth; D Mant; M Gantley
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-03-13

3.  Behavioural counselling in general practice about risk of CHD. Study was grossly underpowered.

Authors:  F D Hobbs
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-07-01

4.  Preventing cardiovascular disease in primary care.

Authors:  L Toop; D Richards
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-08-04

5.  Reducing the risk of recurrent coronary heart disease. We know a bit more about what doesn't work.

Authors:  F Bradley; M E Cupples
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-06-05

6.  Assessing quality of a worksite health promotion programme from participants' views: findings from a qualitative study in Malaysia.

Authors:  Siow-Yen Liau; Mohamed-Azmi A Hassali; Asrul A Shafie; Mohamed-Izham M Ibrahim
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 3.377

7.  Physical activity may be good for you but we are not the key players.

Authors:  Domhnall MacAuley
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  Effect of population screening for type 2 diabetes on mortality: long-term follow-up of the Ely cohort.

Authors:  R K Simmons; M Rahman; R W Jakes; M F Yuyun; A R Niggebrugge; S H Hennings; D R R Williams; N J Wareham; S J Griffin
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 9.  Lifestyle interventions in primary care: systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Patrick Fleming; Marshall Godwin
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.275

10.  A functional genetic variation of the serotonin (5-HT) transporter affects 5-HT1A receptor binding in humans.

Authors:  Sean P David; Naga Venkatesha Murthy; Eugenii A Rabiner; Marcus R Munafó; Elaine C Johnstone; Robyn Jacob; Robert T Walton; Paul M Grasby
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-03-09       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.