Literature DB >> 7741528

Anaerobic digestion and wastewater treatment systems.

G Lettinga1.   

Abstract

Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Bed (UASB) wastewater (pre-)treatment systems represent a proven sustainable technology for a wide range of very different industrial effluents, including those containing toxic/inhibitory compounds. The process is also feasible for treatment of domestic wastewater with temperatures as low as 14-16 degrees C and likely even lower. Compared to conventional aerobic treatment systems the anaerobic treatment process merely offers advantages. This especially is true for the rate of start-up. The available insight in anaerobic sludge immobilization (i.e. granulation) and growth of granular anaerobic sludge in many respects suffices for practice. In anaerobic treatment the immobilization of balanced microbial communities is essential, because the concentration of intermediates then can be kept sufficiently low. So far ignored factors like the death and decay rate of organisms are of eminent importance for the quality of immobilized anaerobic sludge. Taking these factors into account, it can be shown that there does not exist any need for 'phase separation' when treating non- or slightly acidified wastewaters. Phase separation even is detrimental in case the acidogenic organisms are not removed from the effluent of the acidogenic reactor, because they deteriorate the settleability of granular sludge and also negatively affect the formation and growth of granular sludge. The growing insight in the role of factors like nutrients and trace elements, the effect of metabolic intermediates and end products opens excellent prospects for process control, e.g. for the anaerobic treatment of wastewaters containing mainly methanol. Anaerobic wastewater treatment can also profitably be applied in the thermophilic and psychrophilic temperature range. Moreover, thermophilic anaerobic sludge can be used under mesophilic conditions. The Expanded Granular Sludge Bed (EGSB) system particularly offers big practical potentials, e.g. for very low strength wastewaters (COD << 1 g/l) and at temperatures as low as 10 degrees C. In EGSB-systems virtually all the retained sludge is employed, while compared to UASB-systems also a substantially bigger fraction of the immobilized organisms (inside the granules) participates in the process, because an extraordinary high substrate affinity prevails in these systems. It looks necessary to reconsider theories for mass transfer in immobilized anaerobic biomass. Instead of phasing the digestion process, staging of the anaerobic reactors should be applied. In this way mixing up of the sludge can be significantly reduced and a plug flow is promoted. A staged process will provide a higher treatment efficiency and a higher process stability. This especially applies for thermophilic systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7741528     DOI: 10.1007/BF00872193

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek        ISSN: 0003-6072            Impact factor:   2.271


  24 in total

1.  Continuous anaerobic treatment of autoxidized bark extracts in laboratory-scale columns.

Authors:  J Field; M J Leyendeckers; R Sierra-Alvarez; G Lettinga; L H Habets
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  1991-02-05       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Thermophilic anaerobic digestion of sugars in upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors.

Authors:  W M Wiegant; G Lettinga
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Product inhibition of butyrate metabolism by acetate and hydrogen in a thermophilic coculture.

Authors:  B K Ahring; P Westermann
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Effects of Temperature on Methanogenesis in a Thermophilic (58 degrees C) Anaerobic Digestor.

Authors:  S H Zinder; T Anguish; S C Cardwell
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Nutritional Requirements of Methanosarcina sp. Strain TM-1.

Authors:  P A Murray; S H Zinder
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Studies on an acetate-fermenting strain of Methanosarcina.

Authors:  R A Mah; M R Smith; L Baresi
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Bacteriological composition and structure of granular sludge adapted to different substrates.

Authors:  J T Grotenhuis; M Smit; C M Plugge; Y S Xu; A A van Lammeren; A J Stams; A J Zehnder
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Composition of the major elements and trace elements of 10 methanogenic bacteria determined by inductively coupled plasma emission spectrometry.

Authors:  P Scherer; H Lippert; G Wolff
Journal:  Biol Trace Elem Res       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 3.738

9.  Granulation of biomass in thermophilic upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors treating acidified wastewaters.

Authors:  W M Wiegant; A W de Man
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Sodium ions and an energized membrane required by Methanosarcina barkeri for the oxidation of methanol to the level of formaldehyde.

Authors:  M Blaut; V Müller; K Fiebig; G Gottschalk
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 3.490

View more
  45 in total

1.  Distribution of sulfate-reducing and methanogenic bacteria in anaerobic aggregates determined by microsensor and molecular analyses.

Authors:  C M Santegoeds; L R Damgaard; G Hesselink; J Zopfi; P Lens; G Muyzer; D de Beer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Cluster structure of anaerobic aggregates of an expanded granular sludge bed reactor.

Authors:  G Gonzalez-Gil; P N Lens; A Van Aelst; H Van As; A I Versprille; G Lettinga
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Evaluation of substrate removal kinetics for UASB reactors treating chlorinated ethanes.

Authors:  Debolina Basu; Shyam R Asolekar
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Diversity, localization, and physiological properties of filamentous microbes belonging to Chloroflexi subphylum I in mesophilic and thermophilic methanogenic sludge granules.

Authors:  Takeshi Yamada; Yuji Sekiguchi; Hiroyuki Imachi; Yoichi Kamagata; Akiyoshi Ohashi; Hideki Harada
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Phage diversity in a methanogenic digester.

Authors:  M-O Park; H Ikenaga; K Watanabe
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 4.552

6.  Molecular monitoring of microbial population dynamics during operational periods of anaerobic hybrid reactor treating cassava starch wastewater.

Authors:  Nimaradee Boonapatcharoen; Kulyanee Meepian; Pawinee Chaiprasert; Somkiet Techkarnjanaruk
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 4.552

7.  Degradation of methanethiol by methylotrophic methanogenic archaea in a lab-scale upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor.

Authors:  F A M de Bok; R C van Leerdam; B P Lomans; H Smidt; P N L Lens; A J H Janssen; A J M Stams
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-09-29       Impact factor: 4.792

8.  Microwave radiation and reactor design influence microbial communities during methane fermentation.

Authors:  Agnieszka Cydzik-Kwiatkowska; Marcin Zieliński; Paulina Jaranowska
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 3.346

9.  Bacterial community structures are unique and resilient in full-scale bioenergy systems.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Werner; Dan Knights; Marcelo L Garcia; Nicholas B Scalfone; Samual Smith; Kevin Yarasheski; Theresa A Cummings; Allen R Beers; Rob Knight; Largus T Angenent
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Population dynamics of propionate-oxidizing bacteria under methanogenic and sulfidogenic conditions in anaerobic granular sludge.

Authors:  H J Harmsen; A D Akkermans; A J Stams; W M de Vos
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.