Literature DB >> 7737641

Immunoglobulin G lymphocytotoxic antibodies in clinical liver transplantation: studies toward further defining their significance.

R Mañez1, R H Kelly, M Kobayashi, S Takaya, O Bronsther, D Kramer, R J Duquesnoy, Y Iwaki, J J Fung, T E Starzl.   

Abstract

Twenty-two consecutive liver allograft recipients, who tested positive for immunoglobulin G (IgG) lymphocytotoxicity were subjected to pretransplantation and posttransplantation immunologic monitoring of anti-donor IgG lymphocytotoxic antibody titers, total hemolytic complement activity (CH100), circulating immune complexes (CIC), and platelet counts in an effort to improve our understanding of the preformed antibody state in clinical hepatic transplantation. Ten contemporaneous liver transplant recipients whose crossmatch results were negative and who experienced severe hepatocellular damage early after transplantation were included as controls. Crossmatch test results were negative 1 day after transplantation and during the 1 month follow-up remained negative in 14 of 22 (64%) sensitized recipients, most of whom had relatively low (< or = 1:16) anti-donor IgG antibody titers before transplantation. After transplantation, this group and the control group experienced no thrombocytopenia, no increase of CIC, and a gradual increase in CH100 activity that reached normal levels within 1 week. A strong negative correlation between prothrombin time (PT) and CH100 activity in these groups of patients suggested that changes in CH100 activity (P < .0005) were tightly linked to liver synthetic function. In contrast, the crossmatch test results remained positive after transplantation in 8 of 22 (36%) sensitized recipients, all of whom had relatively high (> 1:32 to 1024) pretransplantation titers of anti-donor IgG antibodies. After transplantation these patients developed a syndrome that was characterized by decreased CH100 activity and increased CIC compared with pretransplantation levels and refractory thrombocytopenia that was associated with a 50% allograft failure rate because of biopsy-proven humoral and acute (cellular) rejection.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7737641      PMCID: PMC2977952          DOI: 10.1002/hep.1840210519

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hepatology        ISSN: 0270-9139            Impact factor:   17.425


  43 in total

1.  Significance of a positive crossmatch on outcome in human liver transplantation.

Authors:  K Ogura; H Koyama; S Takemoto; P I Terasaki; R W Busuttil
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 1.066

2.  Liver transplantation in positive cytotoxic crossmatch cases using FK506, high-dose steroids, and prostaglandin E1.

Authors:  S Takaya; Y Iwaki; T E Starzl
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 4.939

3.  Relationship between the liver and lymphocytotoxic alloantibodies in inbred rats. Specific absorption by nonparenchymal liver cells.

Authors:  J Gugenheim; B Le Thai; P Rouger; M Gigou; P Gane; M C Vial; B Charpentier; M Reynes; H Bismuth
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  Liver allograft rejection in sensitized recipients. Observations in a clinically relevant small animal model.

Authors:  K Nakamura; N Murase; M J Becich; T Furuya; S Todo; J J Fung; T E Starzl; A J Demetris
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 5.  The biological basis of and strategies for clinical xenotransplantation.

Authors:  T E Starzl; L A Valdivia; N Murase; A J Demetris; P Fontes; A S Rao; R Manez; I R Marino; S Todo; A W Thomson
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 12.988

6.  Prolongation of pig-to-dog renal xenograft survival by modification of the inflammatory mediator response.

Authors:  L Makowka; C Miller; P Chapchap; L Podesta; C Pan; D Pressley; V Mazzaferro; C O Esquivel; S Todo; B Banner
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Relevance of a positive crossmatch in liver transplantation.

Authors:  S Karuppan; B G Ericzon; E Möller
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 3.782

8.  Evidence for hyperacute rejection of human liver grafts: The case of the canary kidneys.

Authors:  Thomas E Starzl; Anthony J Demetris; Satoru Todo; Yoogoo Kang; Andreas Tzakis; Rene Duquesnoy; Leonard Makowka; Barbara Banner; Waldo Concepcion; Kendrick A Porter
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.863

9.  Hyperacute renal allograft rejection in the rabbit. Vasoconstriction demonstrated by microangiography.

Authors:  Y Terada; A Ueno
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 4.939

10.  The effect of cyclosporine, total lymphoid irradiation, and cobra venom factor on hyperacute rejection.

Authors:  S J Knechtle; E C Halperin; C E Murphy; T Saad; K Abernethy; D Miller; R R Bollinger
Journal:  J Heart Transplant       Date:  1985 Sep-Oct
View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  ABO-compatible liver allograft antibody-mediated rejection: an update.

Authors:  Anthony J Demetris; Adriana Zeevi; Jacqueline G O'Leary
Journal:  Curr Opin Organ Transplant       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.640

2.  Antibody-mediated rejection as a contributor to previously unexplained early liver allograft loss.

Authors:  Jacqueline G O'Leary; Hugo Kaneku; Anthony J Demetris; John D Marr; S Michelle Shiller; Brian M Susskind; Glenn W Tillery; Paul I Terasaki; Göran B Klintmalm
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 5.799

3.  Acute liver allograft antibody-mediated rejection: an inter-institutional study of significant histopathological features.

Authors:  Jacqueline G O'Leary; S Michelle Shiller; Christopher Bellamy; Michael A Nalesnik; Hugo Kaneku; Linda W Jennings; Kumiko Isse; Paul I Terasaki; Göran B Klintmalm; Anthony J Demetris
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 5.799

4.  Portal capillary C4d deposits and increased infiltration by macrophages indicate humorally mediated mechanisms in acute cellular liver allograft rejection.

Authors:  Anja Dankof; Maximilian Schmeding; Lars Morawietz; Raphaela Günther; Manfred G Krukemeyer; Birgit Rudolph; Martin Koch; Veit Krenn; Ulf Neumann
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2005-06-10       Impact factor: 4.064

5.  The role of donor-specific HLA alloantibodies in liver transplantation.

Authors:  J G O'Leary; A J Demetris; L S Friedman; H M Gebel; P F Halloran; A D Kirk; S J Knechtle; S V McDiarmid; A Shaked; P I Terasaki; K J Tinckam; S J Tomlanovich; K J Wood; E S Woodle; A A Zachary; G B Klintmalm
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2014-03-01       Impact factor: 8.086

Review 6.  Combined heart-liver transplantation: Indications, outcomes and current experience.

Authors:  Eliza W Beal; Khalid Mumtaz; Don Hayes; Bryan A Whitson; Sylvester M Black
Journal:  Transplant Rev (Orlando)       Date:  2016-07-17       Impact factor: 3.943

Review 7.  Clinical significance of donor-specific human leukocyte antigen antibodies in liver transplantation.

Authors:  Antonio Cuadrado; David San Segundo; Marcos López-Hoyos; Javier Crespo; Emilio Fábrega
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  Pig Liver Xenotransplantation: A Review of Progress Toward the Clinic.

Authors:  David K C Cooper; Ke-Feng Dou; Kai-Shan Tao; Zhao-Xu Yang; A Joseph Tector; Burcin Ekser
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  Combined heart and liver transplant attenuates cardiac allograft vasculopathy compared with isolated heart transplantation.

Authors:  Yan Topilsky; Eugenia Raichlin; Tal Hasin; Barry A Boilson; John A Schirger; Naveen L Pereira; Brooks S Edwards; Alfredo L Clavell; Richard J Rodeheffer; Robert P Frantz; Manish J Gandhi; Simon Maltais; Soon J Park; Richard C Daly; Amir Lerman; Sudhir S Kushwaha
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 4.939

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.