Literature DB >> 7868154

The biological basis of and strategies for clinical xenotransplantation.

T E Starzl1, L A Valdivia, N Murase, A J Demetris, P Fontes, A S Rao, R Manez, I R Marino, S Todo, A W Thomson.   

Abstract

Recent discoveries have suggested that the exchange of multiple leukocyte lineages between grafts and host and subsequent long-term chimerism in both is the seminal mechanism of the acceptance of organs transplanted from the same (allografts) or different species (xenografts). This insight suggests new strategies which may allow xenotransplantation, the principal obstacle to which has been humoral rejection. We have defined humoral rejection as a family of complement activation syndromes afflicting allografts and xenografts in which there is a strong (but not invariable) association with performed antigraft antibodies, invariable evidence of complement activation, histopathologic stigmas of vascular endothelial damage, and a concomitant local or systemic coagulopathy. The generic descriptive term hyperacute rejection is a misnomer because a slow-motion version of the same "humoral" process can occur with some allografts and is the rule with the so-called concordant species xenotransplantations. The pathway of experience and discovery leading to this conclusion shows clearly that the distinction frequently made between allograft versus xenograft humoral rejection does not actually exist in principle, but only in details and intensity. Breaking down this barrier to xenotransplantation, whether or not it is associated with antibodies, is unrealistic. However, the possibility of avoiding the barrier has been exposed by showing that animal organs can be humanized, with a mixed donor and recipient cell population similar to the chimerism seen in long surviving allografts or even with complete leukocyte replacement. Pilot experiments in rodents suggest that organs from fully xenogeneic chimeras can be made into xenogeneic targets that are no more provocative of complement activation than allografts when they are transplanted into the donor bone marrow species. Although the validity of this concept of organ xenograft preparation is only at the pilot stage of verification, there is reason to suspect that the complement trigger of humoral rejection can be thereby disarmed. If this can be accomplished, independent evidence suggests that cellular rejection can be controlled with conventional T-cell directed immunosuppression, perhaps even with surprising ease. The potential subtle liability of synthetic products of xenogeneic parenchymal cells is not yet known.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7868154      PMCID: PMC3005617          DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-065x.1994.tb00879.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Immunol Rev        ISSN: 0105-2896            Impact factor:   12.988


  149 in total

1.  The principle of mixed agglutination applied to tissue culture systems; a method for study of cell-bound blood-group antigens.

Authors:  C HOGMAN
Journal:  Vox Sang       Date:  1959-02       Impact factor: 2.144

2.  Liver transplantation in positive cytotoxic crossmatch cases using FK506, high-dose steroids, and prostaglandin E1.

Authors:  S Takaya; Y Iwaki; T E Starzl
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 4.939

3.  Thoracic duct drainage in organ transplantation: will it permit better immunosuppression?

Authors:  T E Starzl; L J Koep; R Weil; C G Halgrimson; J J Franks
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 1.066

4.  Unsuccessful attempts to control hyperacute rejection of human renal homografts with F(ab') 2 and citrate organ pretreatment.

Authors:  J L Corman; N Kashiwagi; K A Porter; G Andres; S Iwatsuki; C W Putnam; M Popovtzer; I Penn; T E Starzl
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1973-07       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  Prostaglandin E 1 as a regulator of lymphocyte function. Selective action on B lymphocytes and synergy with procarbazine in depression of immune responses.

Authors:  F Quagliata; V J Lawrence; J M Phillips-Quagliata
Journal:  Cell Immunol       Date:  1973-03       Impact factor: 4.868

6.  Prolongation of pig-to-dog renal xenograft survival by modification of the inflammatory mediator response.

Authors:  L Makowka; C Miller; P Chapchap; L Podesta; C Pan; D Pressley; V Mazzaferro; C O Esquivel; S Todo; B Banner
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Evidence for hyperacute rejection of human liver grafts: The case of the canary kidneys.

Authors:  Thomas E Starzl; Anthony J Demetris; Satoru Todo; Yoogoo Kang; Andreas Tzakis; Rene Duquesnoy; Leonard Makowka; Barbara Banner; Waldo Concepcion; Kendrick A Porter
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.863

8.  Human fetal pancreas--a potential source for transplantation.

Authors:  D A Hullett; J L Falany; R B Love; W J Burlingham; M Pan; H W Sollinger
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 4.939

9.  Donor species complement after liver xenotransplantation. The mechanism of protection from hyperacute rejection.

Authors:  L A Valdivia; J J Fung; A J Demetris; S Celli; F Pan; M Tsugita; T E Starzl
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1994-03-27       Impact factor: 4.939

10.  The prolongation of concordant hamster-to-rat cardiac xenografts by brequinar sodium.

Authors:  D V Cramer; F A Chapman; B D Jaffee; I Zajac; G Hreha-Eiras; C Yasunaga; G D Wu; L Makowka
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 4.939

View more
  19 in total

1.  Hepatic and intestinal transplantation at the University of Pittsburgh.

Authors:  K Abu-Elmagd; J Fung; J Reyes; A Rao; A Jain; G Mazariegos; W Marsh; J Madariaga; I Dvorchik; J Bueno; J Rogers; J McMichael; F Dodson; H Vargus; J Martin; A Slivka; V Balan; R Corry; J Rakela; N Murase; J Demetris; S Iwatsuki; T Starzl
Journal:  Clin Transpl       Date:  1998

2.  The first baboon-to-human transplants.

Authors:  T E Starzl
Journal:  Xenotransplantation       Date:  1996-12-01       Impact factor: 3.907

3.  Hepatic transplantation at the University of Pittsburgh: new horizons and paradigms after 30 years of experience.

Authors:  K Abu-Elmagd; S Todo; J Fung; J Demetris; J Rakela; A S Rao; S Iwatsuki; T Starzl
Journal:  Clin Transpl       Date:  1994

4.  Functional cooperation of xenoproteins after hamster-to-rat liver transplantation: With particular reference to hamster C3 and secretory component for rat IgA.

Authors:  S Celli; L A Valdivia; R H Kelly; A J Demetris; J J Fung; A S Rao; F Pan; M Tsugita; T E Starzl
Journal:  Xenotransplantation       Date:  1995-02-01       Impact factor: 3.907

5.  The basis of allograft acceptance.

Authors:  Thomas E Starzl
Journal:  Forum (Genova)       Date:  1997

6.  Clinical and basic scientific implications of cell migration and microchimerism after organ transplantation.

Authors:  T E Starzl
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.094

Review 7.  The future of transplantation: with particular reference to chimerism and xenotransplantation.

Authors:  T E Starzl; A J Demetris; N Murase; L Valdivia; A W Thomson; J Fung; A S Rao
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1997 Feb-Mar       Impact factor: 1.066

8.  Correction of congenital hyperbilirubinemia in homozygous Gunn rats by xenotransplantation of hamster livers.

Authors:  Yoshitaka Wakizaka; Toshio Miki; Abdul S Rao; Xue Wang; April L Goller; Anthony J Demetris; John J Fung; Thomas E Starzl; Luis A Valdivia
Journal:  Xenotransplantation       Date:  1997-11-01       Impact factor: 3.907

9.  Evidence for engraftment of human bone marrow cells in non-lethally irradiated baboons.

Authors:  P Fontes; J Rogers; A S Rao; M Trucco; A Zeevi; C Ricordi; J J Fung; T E Starzl
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1997-12-15       Impact factor: 4.939

10.  Effect of anticomplement agent K76 COOH on hamster-to-rat and guinea pig-to-rat heart xenotransplantation.

Authors:  M Tanaka; N Murase; Q Ye; W Miyazaki; M Nomoto; H Miyazawa; R Manez; Y Toyama; A J Demetris; S Todo; T E Starzl
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1996-09-15       Impact factor: 4.939

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.