Literature DB >> 3829911

Potential impact of quantitative susceptibility tests on the design of aminoglycoside dosing regimens.

J P McCormack, J J Schentag.   

Abstract

Therapeutic drug monitoring of aminoglycosides currently applies pharmacokinetic principles to maintain peak concentrations between 4 and 10 micrograms/ml and troughs less than 2 micrograms/ml. These predetermined concentrations are based on statistical rates of cure and incidences of adverse effects. At present, recommended serum concentration ranges for aminoglycosides (as with other antibiotics) do not specifically target the susceptibility of the individual organism, but compensate only for altered clearance due to diseases. The design of antibiotic regimens based on both pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics is called dual individualization. Logically, the pharmacodynamic parameters, the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the organism and the postantibiotic effect (PAE), should also play a significant role in design of the dosing regimen. Simulations were performed to examine the consequences of designing aminoglycoside regimens considering both disease effects on excretion and bacterial susceptibility (MIC and PAE). The application of dual individualization concepts to aminoglycosides argues for a wider range of dosage requirements than observed with regimens that maintain desired peaks and troughs. If these concepts are accepted, some patients will clearly require more aminoglycoside than is currently used, and others can be managed with substantially less. The aminoglycoside therapeutic window, as it is now conceived, could be markedly different in the future.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3829911

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Intell Clin Pharm        ISSN: 0012-6578


  9 in total

Review 1.  Issues in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of anti-infective agents: kill curves versus MIC.

Authors:  Markus Mueller; Amparo de la Peña; Hartmut Derendorf
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic issues in the treatment of bacterial infectious diseases.

Authors:  P S McKinnon; S L Davis
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2004-03-10       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 3.  Antibiotic tissue penetration and its relevance: impact of tissue penetration on infection response.

Authors:  D E Nix; S D Goodwin; C A Peloquin; D L Rotella; J J Schentag
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  The value of therapeutic drug monitoring to the practising physician--an hypothesis in need of testing.

Authors:  G T McInnes
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 5.  Basis of anti-infective therapy: pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic criteria and methodology for dual dosage individualisation.

Authors:  A Sánchez-Navarro; M M Sánchez Recio
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 6.447

6.  Pharmacokinetics of amikacin in serum and in tissue contiguous with pressure sores in humans with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  J L Segal; S R Brunnemann; I M Eltorai
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Comparison of two methods for determining in vitro postantibiotic effects of three antibiotics on Escherichia coli.

Authors:  D L Rescott; D E Nix; P Holden; J J Schentag
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 8.  The importance of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic surrogate markers to outcome. Focus on antibacterial agents.

Authors:  J M Hyatt; P S McKinnon; G S Zimmer; J J Schentag
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 9.  Clinical significance of antibiotic tissue penetration.

Authors:  J J Schentag
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 6.447

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.