Literature DB >> 7736330

Ultrasound and densitometry of the calcaneus correlate with the failure loads of cadaveric femurs.

M L Bouxsein1, A C Courtney, W C Hayes.   

Abstract

We assessed the bone mineral density (BMD) of 16 matched sets of cadaveric proximal femurs and feet using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). We also estimated the femoral neck length from the DXA scans. Quantitative ultrasound densitometry was used to measure the velocity of sound and broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) in the calcaneus of each foot. The proximal femurs were then tested to failure in a loading configuration designed to simulate a fall with impact to the greater trochanter. Femoral neck BMD and trochanteric BMD were strongly associated with the femoral failure load (r2 = 0.79 and 0.81, respectively; P < 0.001), whereas femoral neck length was modestly correlated with femoral failure load (r2 = 0.27, P = 0.04). Calcaneal BMD (r2 = 0.63, P < 0.001) and BUA (r2 = 0.51, P = 0.002) were also significantly associated with femoral failure load. Given the small sample size, we were unable to detect differences in the strength of the correlations between the independent parameters and femoral failure load. Using linear multiple regression analyses, the strongest predictor of femoral failure load was a combination of femoral neck BMD and femoral neck length (R2 = 0.85, P < 0.001). Thus, it appears that both femoral and calcaneal bone mineral properties may be useful for identifying those persons at greatest risk for hip fracture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7736330     DOI: 10.1007/bf00296338

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int        ISSN: 0171-967X            Impact factor:   4.333


  43 in total

1.  Site-matched calcaneal measurements of broad-band ultrasound attenuation and single X-ray absorptiometry: do they measure different skeletal properties?

Authors:  C C Glüer; M Vahlensieck; K G Faulkner; K Engelke; D Black; H K Genant
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Bone ultrasonic attenuation in women: reproducibility, normal variation and comparison with photon absorptiometry.

Authors:  J G Truscott; M Simpson; S P Stewart; R Milner; C F Westmacott; B Oldroyd; J A Evans; A Horsman; C M Langston; M A Smith
Journal:  Clin Phys Physiol Meas       Date:  1992-02

3.  Bone mineral content and mechanical strength of the femoral neck.

Authors:  N Dalén; L G Hellström; B Jacobson
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1976-10

4.  Comparison of broadband ultrasound attenuation to single X-ray absorptiometry measurements at the calcaneus in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  L M Salamone; E A Krall; S Harris; B Dawson-Hughes
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.333

5.  Pre-existing fractures and bone mass predict vertebral fracture incidence in women.

Authors:  P D Ross; J W Davis; R S Epstein; R D Wasnich
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1991-06-01       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  S R Cummings; D M Black; M C Nevitt; W Browner; J Cauley; K Ensrud; H K Genant; L Palermo; J Scott; T M Vogt
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-01-09       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Age-related reductions in the strength of the femur tested in a fall-loading configuration.

Authors:  A C Courtney; E F Wachtel; E R Myers; W C Hayes
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Screening for osteoporosis: comparison between dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and broadband ultrasound attenuation in 1000 perimenopausal women.

Authors:  A Massie; D M Reid; R W Porter
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Axial and appendicular bone density predict fractures in older women.

Authors:  D M Black; S R Cummings; H K Genant; M C Nevitt; L Palermo; W Browner
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Osteoporotic bone fragility. Detection by ultrasound transmission velocity.

Authors:  R P Heaney; L V Avioli; C H Chesnut; J Lappe; R R Recker; G H Brandenburger
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1989-05-26       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  12 in total

1.  Three-dimensional texture analysis of cancellous bone cores evaluated at clinical CT resolutions.

Authors:  Chad Showalter; Bradley D Clymer; Bradford Richmond; Kimerly Powell
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-09-17       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Influence of handedness on calcaneal ultrasound: implications for assessment of osteoporosis and study design.

Authors:  G M Howard; T V Nguyen; N A Pocock; P J Kelly; J A Eisman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Quantitative ultrasound for the assessment of bone status.

Authors:  R Morita; I Yamamoto; I Yuu; Y Hamanaka; T Ohta; M Takada; R Matsushita; K Masuda
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  The epidemiology of quantitative ultrasound: a review of the relationships with bone mass, osteoporosis and fracture risk.

Authors:  E W Gregg; A M Kriska; L M Salamone; M M Roberts; S J Anderson; R E Ferrell; L H Kuller; J A Cauley
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Ultrasonic measurement: an evaluation of three heel bone scanners compared with a bench-top system.

Authors:  R Strelitzki; A J Clarke; J G Truscott; J A Evans
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 6.  Sideways fall-induced impact force and its effect on hip fracture risk: a review.

Authors:  M Nasiri Sarvi; Y Luo
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 7.  The role of ultrasound in the assessment of osteoporosis: a review.

Authors:  C F Njeh; C M Boivin; C M Langton
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Frequency specific ultrasound attenuation is sensitive to trabecular bone structure.

Authors:  Wei Lin; Frederick Serra-Hsu; Jiqi Cheng; Yi-Xian Qin
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  Areal and volumetric bone mineral density and risk of multiple types of fracture in older men.

Authors:  Didier Chalhoub; Eric S Orwoll; Peggy M Cawthon; Kristine E Ensrud; Robert Boudreau; Susan Greenspan; Anne B Newman; Joseph Zmuda; Douglas Bauer; Steven Cummings; Jane A Cauley
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2016-08-20       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Hip protectors: recommendations for biomechanical testing--an international consensus statement (part I).

Authors:  S N Robinovitch; S L Evans; J Minns; A C Laing; P Kannus; P A Cripton; S Derler; S J Birge; D Plant; I D Cameron; D P Kiel; J Howland; K Khan; J B Lauritzen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-10-06       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.