STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Sciatic neurogenic motor-evoked potentials, spinal evoked potentials, and somatosensory-evoked potentials were recorded in 12 anesthetized dogs that had arterial ischemia of the lumbar cord produced by ligation of segmental arteries. The presence or absence of the above-mentioned potentials was compared with the clinical status of repeated wake-up tests. RESULTS: Although these results were complicated, sciatic neurogenic motor-evoked potential was more sensitive to the spinal cord ischemia and was a better predictor of clinical outcome than spinal evoked potential and somatosensory-evoked potential. However, the presence was not a guarantee of normal function. The initial morphologic change of these potentials secondary to ischemia consisted of a decrease in amplitude and in the number of peaks without a shift of latency. CONCLUSIONS: The present study suggests that the peripheral neurogenic motor-evoked potential is a better warning system for spinal cord ischemia and that its adoption may contribute to the prevention of cord ischemia during spinal surgery, whereas somatosensory-evoked potential and spinal evoked potential cannot be indices.
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Sciatic neurogenic motor-evoked potentials, spinal evoked potentials, and somatosensory-evoked potentials were recorded in 12 anesthetized dogs that had arterial ischemia of the lumbar cord produced by ligation of segmental arteries. The presence or absence of the above-mentioned potentials was compared with the clinical status of repeated wake-up tests. RESULTS: Although these results were complicated, sciatic neurogenic motor-evoked potential was more sensitive to the spinal cord ischemia and was a better predictor of clinical outcome than spinal evoked potential and somatosensory-evoked potential. However, the presence was not a guarantee of normal function. The initial morphologic change of these potentials secondary to ischemia consisted of a decrease in amplitude and in the number of peaks without a shift of latency. CONCLUSIONS: The present study suggests that the peripheral neurogenic motor-evoked potential is a better warning system for spinal cord ischemia and that its adoption may contribute to the prevention of cord ischemia during spinal surgery, whereas somatosensory-evoked potential and spinal evoked potential cannot be indices.