Literature DB >> 7731043

Footprint analysis of M.Sssl and M.Hhal methyltransferases reveals extensive interactions with the substrate DNA backbone.

P Renbaum1, A Razin.   

Abstract

The interactions of the CpG methyltransferases M.Sssl and M.Hhal (GCGC) with substrate DNA were investigated using three different footprinting techniques. The two structurally related enzymes displayed similar specific and non-specific contacts with DNA while bound to their target sequences. DNase I footprinting implicated a region of 18 to 21 base-pairs with which these enzymes interact. Dimethylsulfate protection experiments mostly revealed specific base interactions; each enzyme was shown to interact predominantly with bases at its recognition site in the major groove. However, hydroxyl radical footprints demonstrated extensive interactions with the sugar-phosphate backbone on both strands of the DNA substrate. Both enzymes protected a 16 nucleotide region, in a staggered fashion, covering 9 to 10 nucleotides on each strand. The protected regions, extending for almost a full turn of DNA on each strand, were offset by 6 to 7 nucleotides in the 5' direction, placing both regions on the same face of the double helix, bracketing the major groove. The results suggest that these methyltransferases straddle the major groove from the backbone, but protrude into the groove only to specifically interact with their recognition sites. The sequence-independent interactions observed on the sugar-phosphate backbone may explain the ability of the enzymes to recognize a small sequence, as well as their processive mode of action.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7731043     DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1995.0199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  11 in total

1.  DNA bending induced by DNA (cytosine-5) methyltransferases.

Authors:  T Raskó; C Finta; A Kiss
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-08-15       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Substrate binding in vitro and kinetics of RsrI [N6-adenine] DNA methyltransferase.

Authors:  S S Szegedi; N O Reich; R I Gumport
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-10-15       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Footprint analysis of the bsp RI DNA methyltransferase-DNA interaction.

Authors:  C Finta; A Kiss
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1997-07-15       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  High resolution footprinting of a type I methyltransferase reveals a large structural distortion within the DNA recognition site.

Authors:  D R Mernagh; G G Kneale
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1996-12-15       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Transducing methyltransferase activity into electrical signals in a carbon nanotube-DNA device().

Authors:  Hanfei Wang; Natalie B Muren; David Ordinario; Alon A Gorodetsky; Jacqueline K Barton; Colin Nuckolls
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 9.825

6.  Direct study of DNA-protein interactions in repressed and active chromatin in living cells.

Authors:  M P Kladde; M Xu; R T Simpson
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1996-11-15       Impact factor: 11.598

7.  Genomic repeats, genome plasticity and the dynamics of Mycoplasma evolution.

Authors:  Eduardo P C Rocha; Alain Blanchard
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-05-01       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Electrochemical assay for the signal-on detection of human DNA methyltransferase activity.

Authors:  Natalie B Muren; Jacqueline K Barton
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 15.419

9.  Chemical display of thymine residues flipped out by DNA methyltransferases.

Authors:  S Serva; E Weinhold; R J Roberts; S Klimasauskas
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1998-08-01       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Circularly permuted variants of two CG-specific prokaryotic DNA methyltransferases.

Authors:  Pál Albert; Bence Varga; Nikolett Zsibrita; Antal Kiss
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.