Literature DB >> 7724729

Linear induction of DNA double-strand breakage with X-ray dose, as determined from DNA fragment size distribution.

K Erixon1, B Cedervall.   

Abstract

Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis has been applied to separate DNA from mouse L1210 cells exposed to X-ray doses of 1 to 50 Gy. Simultaneous separation of marker chromosomes in the range 0.1 to 12.6 Mbp allowed calculation of the size distribution of the radiation-induced fragments. The distribution was consistent with a random induction of double-strand breaks (DSBs). A theoretical relationship between the size distribution of such fragments and the average number of induced breaks was used to calculate the yield and dose response. The DNA distribution was determined by both radiolabeling and fluorescence staining. Two independent methods were used to evaluate the radiation-induced yield of DSBs, both assuming that all DNA is broken at random. In the first method we compared the theoretical and experimental fraction of DNA that is below a given size limit. By this method we estimated the yield to be 0.006-0.007 DSB/Gy per million base pairs using the radiolabel and 0.004-0.008 DSB/Gy per million base pairs by fluorescence staining. The dose response was linear in both cases. In the second method we looked only at the size distribution in the resolving part of the gel and compared it to the theoretical distribution. By this method a value of approximately 0.012 DSB/Gy/Mbp was found, using fluorescence as a measure of DNA distribution. In a normal diploid mammalian genome of size 6000 Mbp, this is equivalent to a yield of 25-50 DSBs/Gy or 70 DSBs/Gy, respectively. The second approach, which looks only at the smaller fragments, may overestimate the yield, while the first approach suffers from uncertainties about the fraction of DNA irreversibly trapped in the well. The assay has the capacity to detect a dose of less than 1 Gy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7724729

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  10 in total

1.  Evidence for formation of DNA repair centers and dose-response nonlinearity in human cells.

Authors:  Teresa Neumaier; Joel Swenson; Christopher Pham; Aris Polyzos; Alvin T Lo; PoAn Yang; Jane Dyball; Aroumougame Asaithamby; David J Chen; Mina J Bissell; Stefan Thalhammer; Sylvain V Costes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Mathematical models of the generation of radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Yasumasa Saisho; Atsushi Ito
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2012-08-04       Impact factor: 2.259

3.  The Polycomb group protein EZH2 impairs DNA repair in breast epithelial cells.

Authors:  Michael Zeidler; Sooryanarayana Varambally; Qi Cao; Arul M Chinnaiyan; David O Ferguson; Sofia D Merajver; Celina G Kleer
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.715

4.  A method to monitor replication fork progression in mammalian cells: nucleotide excision repair enhances and homologous recombination delays elongation along damaged DNA.

Authors:  Fredrik Johansson; Anne Lagerqvist; Klaus Erixon; Dag Jenssen
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-11-10       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Randomly distributed DNA double-strand breaks as measured by pulsed field gel electrophoresis: a series of explanatory calculations.

Authors:  B Cedervall; P Källman
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.925

6.  Different roles for nonhomologous end joining and homologous recombination following replication arrest in mammalian cells.

Authors:  Cecilia Lundin; Klaus Erixon; Catherine Arnaudeau; Niklas Schultz; Dag Jenssen; Mark Meuth; Thomas Helleday
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  The STRUCTURAL MAINTENANCE OF CHROMOSOMES 5/6 complex promotes sister chromatid alignment and homologous recombination after DNA damage in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Koichi Watanabe; Michael Pacher; Stefanie Dukowic; Veit Schubert; Holger Puchta; Ingo Schubert
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2009-09-08       Impact factor: 11.277

8.  Methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) produces heat-labile DNA damage but no detectable in vivo DNA double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Cecilia Lundin; Matthew North; Klaus Erixon; Kevin Walters; Dag Jenssen; Alastair S H Goldman; Thomas Helleday
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2005-07-11       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 9.  The role of dose rate in radiation cancer risk: evaluating the effect of dose rate at the molecular, cellular and tissue levels using key events in critical pathways following exposure to low LET radiation.

Authors:  Antone L Brooks; David G Hoel; R Julian Preston
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 2.694

10.  Live Dynamics of 53BP1 Foci Following Simultaneous Induction of Clustered and Dispersed DNA Damage in U2OS Cells.

Authors:  Alice Sollazzo; Beata Brzozowska; Lei Cheng; Lovisa Lundholm; Harry Scherthan; Andrzej Wojcik
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 5.923

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.